1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper provides a summary of the project regarding language and spontaneous trait inference (STI) interaction. For 40 years, different methodologies had been used to study STI. However, these methodologies used sentences to elicit the inference, but they were never controlled from a linguistic point of view. We studied STI behavior when sentences were modified by adverbs of manner and checked linguistic parameters to verify which had more importance when the inference occurred. Results show that not only these adverbs modify the strength for STI, but they sometimes also change which trait is preferably inferred by the participants, adding new traits which were not available if the adverbs were not inferred.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00035.mar
2019-07-12
2019-07-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albrecht, J., & Myers, J.
    (1995) Role of context in accessing distant information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21 (6), 1459–1468.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Asch, S.
    (1946) Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290. 10.1037/h0055756
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055756 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartlett, F.
    (1932) Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlston, D., & Skowronski, J.
    (2005) Linking versus thinking: Evidence for the different associative and attributional bases of spontaneous trait transference and spontaneous trait inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 884–898. 10.1037/0022‑3514.89.6.884
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.884 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cattell, R.
    (1965) The scientific analysis of personality. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cinque, G.
    (1999) Adverbs and functional heads:across-linguistic perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Costa, J.
    (2004) A multifactorial approach to adverb placement: assumptions, facts and problems. Lingua, 114, 711–753. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(03)00049‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00049-4 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2008) O advérbio em português europeu [Theadverb in European Portuguese]. Lisbon: Edições Colibri.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Díaz-Negrillo, A.
    (2014) Subject-relatedness in –ly premodifying adverbs. English Studies, 95 (4), 459–474. 10.1080/0013838X.2014.897092
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2014.897092 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dooling, D., & Christiaansen, R.
    (1977) Episodic and semantic aspects of memory for prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3 (4), 428–436.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Eysenck, H.
    (1951) The organization of personality. Journal of Personality, 20 (1), 101–117. 10.1111/j.1467‑6494.1951.tb01515.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1951.tb01515.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferreira, M., Morais, A., Ferreira, D., & Valchev, N.
    (2005) O João entornou o café, logo é desastrado; mas foi empurrado, logo não é desastrado. Frases implicativas de traços com continuações situacionais e neutras para o estudo das Inferências Espontâneas de Traços [John spilt the coffee, therefore he is clumsy; but he was pushed, therefore he is not clumsy. Trait implicative sentences with situational continuity and neutral for the study of Spontaneous Trait Inferences]. Laboratório de Psicologia, 3, 13–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Frazier, L.
    (1979) On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies (doctoral dissertation). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
  14. (2015) Two interpretive systems for natural language?Journal Psycholinguist Research, 44 (1), 7–25. 10.1007/s10936‑014‑9328‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9328-0 [Google Scholar]
  15. Friederici, A., Pfeifer, E., & Hahne, A.
    (1993) Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1 (3), 183–192. 10.1016/0926‑6410(93)90026‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(93)90026-2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Friederici, A., Steinhauer, K., & Frisch, S.
    (1999) Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information. Memory & Cognition, 27 (3), 438–453. 10.3758/BF03211539
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211539 [Google Scholar]
  17. Graesser, A., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T.
    (1994) Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101 (3), 371–395. 10.1037/0033‑295X.101.3.371
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jackendoff, R.
    (1972) Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ma, N., Vandekerckhove, M., Baetens, K., Van Overwalle, F., Seurinck, R., & Fias, W.
    (2012) Inconsistencies in spontaneous and intentional trait inferences. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 7 (8), 937–950. 10.1093/scan/nsr064
    https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr064 [Google Scholar]
  20. Marcelo, D.
    (2016) Personality trait inferences upon manner adverb insertion. (master’s thesis). University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
  21. Marsh, E.
    (2004) Story stimuli for creating false beliefs about the world. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36 (4), 650–655. 10.3758/BF03206546
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206546 [Google Scholar]
  22. Marsh, E., & Fazio, L.
    (2006) Learning errors from fiction: Difficulties in reducing reliance on fictional stories. Memory & Cognition, 34 (5), 1140–1149. 10.3758/BF03193260
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193260 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2007) Learning from fictional sources. InJ. Nairne (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger (pp.397–413). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Marsh, E., Meade, M., & Roediger, H.
    (2003) Learning facts from fiction. Journal of Memory and Language, 49 (4), 519–536. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00092‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00092-5 [Google Scholar]
  25. Minear, M., & Park, D.
    (2004) A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (4), 630–633. 10.3758/BF03206543
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206543 [Google Scholar]
  26. Prentice, D., Gerrig, R., & Bailis, D.
    (1997) What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4 (3), 416–420. 10.3758/BF03210803
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210803 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ramos, T., & Garcia-Marques, L.
    (2006) Quando uma acção permite diferentes interpretações: Pré-teste de comportamentos ambíguos [When an action allows different interpretations: Pre-test of ambiguous behaviors]. Laboratório de Psicologia, 4 (1), 45–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Raposo, E., Nascimento, M., Mota, M., Segura, L., & Mendes, A.
    (2013) Gramática do Português, Volume I & II [Portuguese Grammar]. Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Todorov, A., & Uleman, J.
    (2002) Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors’ faces: Evidence from a false recognition paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (5), 1051–1065. 10.1037/0022‑3514.83.5.1051
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1051 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2003) The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39 (6), 549–562. 10.1016/S0022‑1031(03)00059‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00059-3 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2004) The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (4), 482–493. 10.1037/0022‑3514.87.4.482
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.482 [Google Scholar]
  32. Uleman, J.
    (1999) Spontaneous versus intentional inferences in impression formation. InS. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp.141–160). New York, NY: Guilford.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Uleman, J., Saribay, S., & Gonzalez, C.
    (2008) Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 329–360. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093707
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093707 [Google Scholar]
  34. Uleman, J., Rim, S., Saribay, S., & Kressel, L.
    (2012) Controversies, questions, and prospects for spontaneous social inferences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6 (9), 657–673. 10.1111/j.1751‑9004.2012.00452.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00452.x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00035.mar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00035.mar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cognition , cognitive science , inference , linguistics and personality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error