1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Cognitive Linguistic Studies
  4. Volume 6, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The Polish perfumery discourse is permeated with various kinds of metaphors, starting with lexicalized metaphorical terms, e.g., “note”, to creative, extended, and elaborated metaphors, e.g., “Intensively flavored entrance hall leads to the citrus salon, which for me could be smaller because the most valuable is the kitchen – the heart of a home!” This paper concentrates on a specific type of verbal metaphor, used quite often in the Polish perfumery discourse, called . Such narrative metaphors can encompass extensive fragments of a discourse or even a whole text. This study describes the triggers of narrative metaphors in perfumery discourse and emphasizes the importance of reference in such metaphor analysis.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00039.zaw
2020-02-04
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00039.zaw
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Badyda, E.
    (2013) “Upadły anioł zmysłów?”: Metaforyka zapachu i percepcji węchowej we współczesnej polszczyźnie. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Black, M.
    (1949) Language and philosophy: Studies in method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruner, J. S.
    (2009) Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cain, W. S.
    (2012) History of research on smell. InE. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception. Volume VI a: Tasting and Smelling (pp.197–229). New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, L.
    (2011) Metaphor and reconciliation. The discourse dynamics of empathy in post-conflict conversations. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. (2016) Mixed metaphors from a discourse dynamic perspective: A non-issue?InR. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp.17–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Carnap, R.
    (1947) Meaning and necessity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2016) The “dull roar” and the “burning barbed wire pantyhose”: Complex metaphor in accounts of chronic pain. InR. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp.155–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Crisp, P.
    (2005) Allegory, blending, and possible situations. Metaphor and Symbol, 20 (2), 115–131. 10.1207/s15327868ms2002_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2002_2 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2008) Between extended metaphor and allegory: Is blending enough?. Language and Literature, 17 (4), 291–308. 10.1177/0963947008095960
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947008095960 [Google Scholar]
  11. Crisp, P., Heywood, J., & Steen, G.
    (2002) Metaphor identification and analysis, classification and quantification. Language and Literature, 11 (1), 55–69. 10.1177/096394700201100105
     https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700201100105 [Google Scholar]
  12. Croft, W.
    (1991) Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
    (2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
    (2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Deignan, A.
    (2017) Mapping and narrative in figurative communication. InB. Hampe, (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp.200–219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108182324.012
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.012 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dobrzyńska, T.
    (1984) Metafora [Metaphor]. Wrocław/ Warszawa/ Kraków/ Gdańsk/ Łódź: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Fillmore, C.
    (1982) Frame semantics. InThe Linguistics Society of Korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp.111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Fludernik, M.
    (2009a) The cage metaphor: Extending narratology into corpus studies and opening it to the analysis of imagery. InS. Heinen & R. Sommer (Eds.), Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research (pp.109–128). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. (2009b) An introduction to narratology. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203882887
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882887 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gibbs, R. W.
    (2015) The allegorical character of political metaphors in discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 5 (2), 264–282. 10.1075/msw.5.2.05gib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.2.05gib [Google Scholar]
  21. (2017) Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107762350
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107762350 [Google Scholar]
  22. (Ed.) (2016) Mixing metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.6 [Google Scholar]
  23. Grzegorczykowa, R.
    (2012) Określenia percepcji węchowej w języku polskim [Denotations of olfactory perception in Polish]. InR. Grzegorczykowa, & A. Mikołajczuk (Eds.), Świat widziany poprzez słowa. Szkice z semantyki leksykalnej (pp.160–168). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hellsten, I.
    (2002) The politics of metaphor: Biotechnology and biodiversity in the media. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jackendoff, R.
    (1983) Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kimmel, M.
    (2010) Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (1), 97–115. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.017 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kövecses, Z.
    (2016) A view of “mixed metaphors” within a conceptual metaphor theory framework. InR. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp.1–16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kunz, K. A.
    (2010) Variation in English and German nominal coreference: A study of political essays. Oxford: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lakoff, G.
    (2014) Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–14. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (2008 [1980]) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lakoff, G., & Narayan, S.
    (2010) Toward a computational model of narrative. AAAI Fall Symposium: Computational Models of Narrative, 21–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Le Guérer, A.
    (2002) Olfaction and cognition: A philosophical and psychoanalytic view. InC. Rouby, (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition (pp.3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511546389.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546389.005 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mill, J. S.
    (1875) A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence, and the methods of scientific investigation. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Moore, K. E.
    (2006) Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17 (2), 199–244. 10.1515/COG.2006.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.005 [Google Scholar]
  35. Musolff, A.
    (2004) Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230504516
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21 (1), 23–38. 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nerlich, B.
    (2011) The role of metaphor scenarios in disease management discourses: Foot and mouth disease and avian influenza. InS. Handl & H. J. Schmid (Eds.), Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending (pp.115–142). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110238198.115
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238198.115 [Google Scholar]
  38. Oswald, S., & Rihs, A.
    (2014) Metaphor as argument: Rhetorical and epistemic advantages of extended metaphors. Argumentation, 28 (2), 133–159. 10.1007/s10503‑013‑9304‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-013-9304-0 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pisarkowa, K.
    (1972) Szkic pola semantycznego zapachów w polszczyźnie [Study of lexical field of smell in Polish]. Język polski, 52 (5), 330–339.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (1), 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pybus, D., & Sell, C.
    (Eds.) (2007) The chemistry of fragrances. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Reddy, M. J.
    (1983 [1969]) Semantyczne ujęcia metafory [A semantic approach to metaphor, reprinted from: Fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society]. Pamiętnik Literacki, 74 (2), 307–320.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Ritchie, L. D.
    (2010) Everybody goes down: Metaphors, stories, and simulations in conversations. Metaphor and Symbol, 25 (3), 123–143. 10.1080/10926488.2010.489383
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2010.489383 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2011) Justice is blind: A model for analyzing metaphor transformations and narratives in actual discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 1, 70–89. 10.1075/msw.1.1.08rit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.08rit [Google Scholar]
  45. (2017a) Story simulation in metaphor comprehension. Metaphor. InB. Hampe (Ed.), Embodied cognition and discourse (pp.220–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108182324.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.013 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2017b) Metaphorical stories in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316717172
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316717172 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schank, R. C., & Ableson, R. P.
    (1995) Knowledge and memory: The real story. InR. S. Wyer (Ed.), Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp.1–85). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Snævarr, S.
    (2010) Metaphors, narratives, emotions: Their interplay and impact. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789042027800
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042027800 [Google Scholar]
  50. Steen, G. J.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification. From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stickles, E., David, O., Dodge, E. K., & Hong, J.
    (2016) Formalizing contemporary conceptual metaphor theory. Constructions and frames, 8 (2), 166–213. 10.1075/cf.8.2.03sti
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.2.03sti [Google Scholar]
  52. Sullivan, K.
    (2006) Frame-based constraints on lexical choice in metaphor. Annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Vol.32, No.1, 387–399. 10.3765/bls.v32i1.3476
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v32i1.3476 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.14 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2018) Integrating constructional semantics and conceptual metaphor. InM. R. L. Petruck (Ed.), MetaNet (pp.11–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. (2019) Mixed metaphors: Their use and abuse. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350066076
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350066076 [Google Scholar]
  56. Tirrell, L.
    (1989) Extending: The structure of metaphor. Noûs, 23 (1), 17–34. 10.2307/2215827
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2215827 [Google Scholar]
  57. Werth, P.
    (1994) Extended metaphor –A text-world account. Language and Literature, 3 (2), 79–103. 10.1177/096394709400300201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709400300201 [Google Scholar]
  58. White, R. M.
    (1996) The structure of metaphor. The way the language of metaphor works. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Winter, B.
    (2019) Synaesthetic metaphors are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical. InL. J. Speed, C. O”Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp.105–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.19.06win
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.06win [Google Scholar]
  60. Zawisławska, M.
    (2015) Reference, anaphora, coreference. InM. Ogrodniczuk, (Eds.), Coreference in Polish: Annotation, resolution and evaluation (pp.3–22). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Ziem, A.
    (2014) Frames of understanding in text and discourse: Theoretical foundations and descriptive applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.48
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.48 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00039.zaw
Loading
Narrative metaphors in Polish perfumery discourse
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6, 221 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00039.zaw
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00039.zaw
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00039.zaw
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): metaphor; narrative; olfactory perception; perfume

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error