1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present research studies the naming procedure of technological devices among South Tunisian old people. This study is a reconsideration of the findings of Boubakri (2015) making use of the data collected in an attempt to understand the phenomenon on the basis of a cognitive approach. The data is collected through unintentional observation followed by intentional observation, and it was concluded that old people’s naming procedure is dictated by their internal sensory makeup (Boubakri 2015: 166). On the basis of the collected data and others collected for the purpose of the present research, it is concluded that the cognitive concept of construal lies behind old people’s naming procedure of technological devices, and that the internal cognitive factor involved in the emergence of the construal is metaphor. More precisely, this metaphor is mataphtonymy which is basically motivated by the psychological state of its user.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00041.bou
2020-02-04
2020-08-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boubakri, F.
    (2015) Old people’s adaptation to what is unfamiliar to their schemata. International Journal of Humanities and Culture Studies, 1 (4), 159–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Evans, V.
    (2007) A glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Goossen, L.
    (1990) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1 (3), 323–40. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323 [Google Scholar]
  4. Lakoff, G.
    (1993) The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. InA. Ortony, (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.202–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee, D.
    (2001) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Richards, I. A.
    (1992) New Rhetoric: Multiplicity instrument and metaphor. Journal of Rhetoric Review, 10, 218–31. 10.1080/07350199209388966
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07350199209388966 [Google Scholar]
  7. Stockwell, P.
    (2002) Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00041.bou
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00041.bou
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cognitive linguistics , conceptual metaphor , construal and metaphtonymy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error