1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Conceptual metaphor theory highlights that metaphor is a matter of thinking. This assumption indicates that metaphors exist not only in language, but also in other modes. This study examines uses of visual and visual-verbal metaphors in 50 Chinese editorial cartoons conceptualizing serious haze problem, with the intention of eliciting implicit meaning conveyed by visual signs alone or together with verbal texts. Both conceptual and critical discourse analysis of the metaphors are conducted. The study finds that the way a metaphor is realized visually and verbally in a cartoon determines the features mapped onto the topic, and further implicitly expresses a critical stance toward the topic under discussion. The metaphors in the cartoons evoke a general understanding of haze problem by activating the war scenario and familiar cultural or social context in viewers. It is found in this corpus that visual fusion and visual replacement are the most frequent kinds of visual metaphors. The study further affirms that visual metaphors are better in conveying rich and implicit conceptual and affective meaning, and can be direct manifestation of the conceptual metaphor without the mediation of language. In sum the study suggests the need for an integrated approach to visual metaphoric representation in multimodal analysis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00043.niu
2020-02-04
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aldrich, V. C.
    (1968) Visual metaphor. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 2, 73–80. 10.2307/3331241
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3331241 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barthes, R.
    (1977) Image, music, text. Transl. byStephen Heath. London: Fontana.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bateman, J. A.
    (2008) Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230582323
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582323 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell, S.
    (2004) Drawing Tony. The Guardian, 17 July, 11.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bortoluzzi, M.
    (2009) Towards a framework of critical multimodal analysis: Emotion in a film trailer. InA. Esposito & R. Vích (Eds.), Cross-modal analysis (pp.50–62). Spring-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bounegru, L. & Forceville, C.
    (2011) Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10 (2), 209–229. 10.1177/1470357211398446
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357211398446 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brooks, P. H.
    (1977) The role of action lines in children’s memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 98–107. 10.1016/0022‑0965(77)90076‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(77)90076-5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cameron, L.
    (1999) Operationalizing “metaphor” for applied linguistic research. InL. Cameron, & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp.1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524704
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524704 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carroll, N.
    (1996) A note on film metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics, 26 (6), 809–822. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00021‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00021-5 [Google Scholar]
  10. El Refaie, E.
    (2003) Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2, 75–95. 10.1177/1470357203002001755
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2009) Metaphors in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp.173–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fairclough, N.
    (2005) Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. InR. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in discourse analysis (pp.53–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2006) Semiosis, ideology and mediation: A dialectical view. InI. Lassen, J. Strunck & T. Vestergaard (Eds.), Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies (pp.19–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.18.04fai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.18.04fai [Google Scholar]
  14. Forceville, C.
    (1994) Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9 (1), 1–29. 10.1207/s15327868ms0901_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0901_1 [Google Scholar]
  15. (1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203272305
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305 [Google Scholar]
  16. Forcevillie, C.
    (2002) The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (1), 1–14. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00007‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00007-8 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2006) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. InG. K. M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. J. R. de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp.379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Forceville, C.
    (2008) Metaphors in pictures and multimodal representations. InR. W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.462–482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2016) Visual and multimodal metaphor in film: Charting the field. InK. Fahlenbrach (Ed.), Embodied metaphors in film, television and video games: Cognitive approaches (pp.17–32). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Franklin, M. B.
    (1988) Museum of the mind: An inquiry into the titling of artworks. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3 (3), 157–174. 10.1207/s15327868ms0303_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0303_4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibbs, R. W. Jr., Lima, P. L. C., & Francozo, E.
    (2004) Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1189–1210. 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.009 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
    (2008) Metaphor and thought: The state of the art. InR. W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.3–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gombrich, E. H.
    (1971) The cartoonist’s armoury. InE. H. Gombrich (Ed.), Meditations on a hobby horse and other essays on the theory of art (pp.127–142). London: Phaidon.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hall, S.
    (1997) The spectacle of the “other”. InS. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practice (pp.223–279). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1994) An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd ed.London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Janzen, T.
    (2006) Visual communication: Signed language and cognition. InG. K. M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. J. R. de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp.359–377). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jewitt, C.
    (2009) An introduction to multimodality. InC. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp.14–27). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnson, M.
    (2007) The Meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kennedy, J. M.
    (1982) Metaphors in picture. Perception, 11, 589–605. 10.1068/p110589
    https://doi.org/10.1068/p110589 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2008) Metaphor and art. InR. W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.447–461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.027 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kennedy, J. M., Green, C. D., & Vervaeke, J.
    (1993) Metaphoric thought and devices in pictures. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8 (3), 243–255. 10.1207/s15327868ms0803_9
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0803_9 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kövecses, Z.
    (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kress, G.
    (2000) Text as the punctuation of semiosis: Pulling at some of the threads. InU. H. Meinhof & J. Smith (Eds.), Intertextuality and the media: From genre to everyday life (pp.132–154). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. V.
    (1996) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lakoff, G.
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lakoff, G., & Mark, T.
    (1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lan, C., & Zuo, D.
    (2015) Pictorial-verbal metaphors in Chinese editorial cartoons on food safety. Metaphor and the Social World, 1, 20–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lassen, I., Strunck, J., & Vestergaard, T.
    (2006) Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.18 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lim, F. V.
    (2004) Developing an integrative multi-semiotic Model. InK. L. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis, (pp.220–245). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lin, T. Y., & Chiang, W.
    (2015) Multimodal fusion in analyzing political cartoons: Debates on U.S. beef imports into Taiwan. Metaphor and Symbol, 30, 137–161. 10.1080/10926488.2015.1016859
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1016859 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pérez-Sobrino, P.
    (2016) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising: A Corpus-based account. Metaphor and symbol, 31 (2), 73–90. 10.1080/10926488.2016.1150759
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1150759 [Google Scholar]
  44. Phillips, B. J. and McQuarrie, E. F.
    (2004) Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing theory, 4, 113–136. 10.1177/1470593104044089
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593104044089 [Google Scholar]
  45. Schilperoord, J., & Maes, A.
    (2009) Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp.213–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Suler, J., & Zakia, R. D.
    (2018) Perception and imaging: Photography as a way of seeing. New York and London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Teng, N. Y., & Sun, S.
    (2002) Grouping, simile, and oxymoron in pictures: A design-based cognitive approach. Metaphor and Symbol, 17 (4), 295–316. 10.1207/S15327868MS1704_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1704_3 [Google Scholar]
  49. Urios-Aparisi, E.
    (2009) Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp.95–118). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Yus, F.
    (2009) Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp.147–172). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00043.niu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00043.niu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): critical multimodal discourse analysis , editorial cartoons , visual metaphor and war scenario
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error