Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The paper presents an in-depth analysis of the language of death in Chinese and discusses the relation between language and occupation as a social factor in analyzing the language of death. In this paper, I address in what specific ways Cognitive Linguistics may serve as a useful analytical framework in studying Chinese idioms used in funerals, in an attempt to uncover cultural elements and viewpoint structure in communicating death. The study introduces basic constructs in Cognitive Linguistics which could be used for such an analysis, and applies this CL machinery to analyzing three selected groups of four-character eulogistic idioms used at funerals in Taiwan. The analysis shows that, in addition to Conceptual Metaphor Theory, which has been considered the classic CL tool for studying abstract concepts like death, the subjectivity/objectivity distinction in Cognitive Grammar may also be employed as a complementary and useful theoretical construct in studying the language of death, as it helps identify the special characteristics of the eulogistic idioms for teachers as a special profession in the Chinese culture.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Allan, K., & Burridge, K.
    (2006) Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511617881
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
    (Eds.) (2000) Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benczes, R., & Burridge, K.
    (2018) Speaking of disease and death. InKeith Allan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of taboo words and language (pp.61–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Capone, A.
    (2010) On pragmemes again. Dealing with death. La linguistique, 46, 3–21. 10.3917/ling.462.0003
    https://doi.org/10.3917/ling.462.0003 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carter, R., Goddard, A., Reah, D., Sanger, K., & Bowring, M.
    (1997) Working with texts: A core book for language analysis. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203468470
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203468470 [Google Scholar]
  6. Crespo-Fernández, E.
    (2006) The language of death: Euphemism and conceptual metaphorization in Victorian obituaries. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 19, 101–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crespo Fernández, E.
    (2011) Euphemistic conceptual metaphors in epitaphs from Highgate Cemetery. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 198–225. 10.1075/rcl.9.1.10cre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.10cre [Google Scholar]
  8. Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
    (2013) Euphemistic metaphors in English and Spanish epitaphs: A comparative study. Atlantis, 35(2), 99–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dancygier, B., Lu, W., & Verhagen, A.
    (Eds.) (2016) Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110365467
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365467 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gee, J.
    (1999) An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Flores Moreno, C.
    (1999) Time, life and death in Shakespeare’s ‘Sonnets’: The Lakoffian approach to poetic metaphors. RESLA: Revista Española de LingüísticaAplicada, 13, 287–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Halliday, M.
    (1985) An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Havlíčková Kysová, Šárka
    (2016) Stage Metaphors in Verdi’s Otello: Miloš Wasserbauer’s State Theatre Production (Brno 1967) in the Context of Otello’s Staging Tradition. Theatralia19(2), 29–58. 10.5817/TY2016‑2‑2
    https://doi.org/10.5817/TY2016-2-2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lai, V. T. & Boroditsky, L.
    (2013) The immediate and chronic influence of spatio-temporal metaphors on the mental representations of time in English, Mandarin, and Mandarin-English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 142.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Langacker, W. Ronald
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. I). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu, L. W.
    (2008) From textual prompts to cognitive models: A context-oriented perspective on metaphor interpretation in Taiwanese presidential speeches. Language and Linguistics, 9 (2), 341–358.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lu, W.
    (2017a) Socio-cultural factors in analyzing the pragmeme of accommodation: A case study of the official online eulogy request system in Taiwan. InVahid Parvaresh & Alessandro Capone (Eds.), The Pragmeme of accommodation and intercultural pragmatics: The case of interaction around the event of death (pp.111–127). Zurich: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑55759‑5_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55759-5_7 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2017b) Religion and worldview in metaphor use: Cultural conceptualisations of death in Taiwanese Buddhist and Christian eulogistic idioms. InFarzad Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in Cultural Linguistics (pp.49–64). Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑4056‑6_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4056-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2017c) Metaphor, conceptual archetypes and subjectification: The case of COMPLETION IS UP and the polysemy of shàng in Chinese. InAngeliki Athanasiadou (Ed.), Studies in figurative thought and language (pp.231–249). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.56.09lu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.56.09lu [Google Scholar]
  22. (2020) Cultural “signs of life” in politics: A case study of eulogistic idioms for Taiwanese politicians. InV. D. Sinha, A. Moreno-Núñez and Z. Tian (Eds.), Signs of life: Changes and continuity in language, thought and identity, (pp.141–156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.13.07lu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.13.07lu [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu, L. W. & K. Ahrens
    (2008) Ideological influence on BUILDING metaphors in Taiwanese presidential speeches. Discourse and Society, 19 (3), 383–408. 10.1177/0957926508088966
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088966 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lu, L. W., & Chiang, W.
    (2007) EMPTINESS WE LIVE BY: Metaphors and paradoxes in Buddhism’s Heart Sutra. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (4), 331–355. 10.1080/10926480701528287
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701528287 [Google Scholar]
  25. Marin-Arrese, J.
    (1996) To die, to sleep: A contrastive study of metaphors for death and dying in English and Spanish. Language Sciences, 18(1–2), 37–52. 10.1016/0388‑0001(96)00006‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(96)00006-X [Google Scholar]
  26. Migut, P.
    (2016) When ‘she’ comes knocking: A cognitive analysis of metaphorical terms linked with death in English and Polish obituaries. PhD diss., University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.
  27. Özcaliskan, S.
    (2003) In a caravanserai with two doors I am walking day and night: Metaphors of death and life in Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics, 14 (1), 281–320.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Partington, A., Taylor, C., & Duguid, A.
    (2013) Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.55
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pelclová, J. & Wei-lun Lu
    (2018) Persuasion across times, domains and modalities: Theoretical considerations and emerging themes. InJana Pelclová & Wei-lun Lu (Eds.), Persuasion in public discourse: Functional and cognitive Perspectives (pp.1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.79.01pel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.01pel [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharifian, F.
    (2011) Cultural conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.1 [Google Scholar]
  31. Tay, D.
    (2019) Death in a multicultural society: Metaphor, language and religion in Singapore obituaries. Cognitive Linguistics Studies, 6 (1), 84–102. 10.1075/cogls.00031.tay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00031.tay [Google Scholar]
  32. Tien, A.
    (2016) What does it mean to “Commemorate”? Linguistic and cultural evidence from Chinese. The Irish Journal of Asian Studies, 2, 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2017) To be headed for the West, riding a crane: Chinese pragmemes in the wake of someone’s passing. InA. Capone & V. Parvaresh (Eds.), The pragmeme of accommodation and intercultural pragmatics: The case of interaction around the event of death (pp.183–202). New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑55759‑5_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55759-5_11 [Google Scholar]
  34. Tseng, M.
    (2017) Toward a pragmatic study of funeral discourses in Taiwan: Voice, shared situation knowledge, and metaphor. InA. Capone & V. Parvaresh (Eds.), The pragmeme of accommodation and intercultural pragmatics: The case of interaction around the event of death (pp.259–276). New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑55759‑5_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55759-5_14 [Google Scholar]
  35. Verhagen, A.
    (2007) Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226702.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226702.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Yu, N.
    (1998) The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.1 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2015) Metaphorical character of moral cognition: A comparative and decompositional analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 30 (3), 163–183. 10.1080/10926488.2015.1049500
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1049500 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2016) Spatial metaphors for morality: A perspective from Chinese. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(2), 108–125. 10.1080/10926488.2016.1150763
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1150763 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error