Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
    (Eds.) (2000) Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chafe, W. L.
    (1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. InC. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp.25–55). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1988) Punctuation and the prosody of written language. Written Communication, 5(4), 396–426. 10.1177/0741088388005004001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088388005004001 [Google Scholar]
  4. (1994) Discourse, consciousness and time: Flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chomsky, N.
    (1957) Syntactic structures. The Hague/Paris: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112316009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
  6. Croft, W.
    (2001) Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dancygier, B.
    (2012) The language of stories: A cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Daneš, F.
    (Ed.) (1974) Papers on functional sentence perspective. Praha: Academia.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Firbas, J.
    (1983) On bipartition, tripartition, and pluripartition in the theory of functional sentence perspective. InT. Dobrzyńska, & E. Janus (Eds.), Text i zdanie (pp.67–79). Wroclaw: Ossolineum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1992) Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597817
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597817 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fodor, J. A.
    (1983) Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gabelentz, G. von der
    (1869) Ideen zu einer vergleichenden Syntax. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft6, 376–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Givón, T.
    (Ed.) (1983) Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2001) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, VolumeI (Rev. ed.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gundel, J. K.
    (1988a) The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory (Outstanding dissertations in linguistics). New York: Garland.
  16. (1988b) Universals of topic-comment structure. InM. Hammond, E. A. Moravcsik, & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp.209–242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.17.16gun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.17.16gun [Google Scholar]
  17. Hajičová, E., Partee, B., & Sgall, P.
    (1998) Topic-focus articulation, tripartite structures, and semantic content. Amsterdam: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9012‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9012-9 [Google Scholar]
  18. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1967) Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 2. Journal of Linguistics3(2), 199–244. 10.1017/S0022226700016613
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613 [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Krifka, M.
    (2007) Basic notions of information structure. InC. Féry, G. Fanselow, & M. Krifka (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure 6: The notions of information structure (pp.13–55). Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kripke, S.
    (1975) Outline of a theory of truth. Journal of Philosophy72, 690–716. 10.2307/2024634
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2024634 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuno, S.
    (1972) Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry3(3), 269–320.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lambrecht, K.
    (1994) Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  25. Langacker, R.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Langacker, R. W.
    (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, C. N. & Thomson, S. A.
    (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Prince, E.
    (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. InP. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp.223–255). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1992) The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. InS. Thompson, & W. Mann (Eds.) Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fund-raising text (pp.295–325). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.16.12pri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16.12pri [Google Scholar]
  30. Verhagen, A.
    (2012) Construal and stylistics – within a language, across contexts, across languages. InStylistics across Disciplines (Conference Proceedings, CD-ROM). Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Weil, H.
    (1844) De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Joubert.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Zimmermann, M., & Féry, C.
    (2010) Introduction. InM. Zimmermann, & C. Féry (Eds.), Information structure: Theoretical, typological, and experimental perspectives (pp.1–11). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error