Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



It is well-established that the linear ordering of words in a sentence is influenced by a variety of factors that are typically labelled as grammatical, discourse or cognitive constraints. The aim of the present study is to determine whether frequency effects are visible in the sequencing of words in a sentence. In other words, do “more frequently used units tend to be placed before less frequently used units” (Fenk-Oczlon 2001: 443)? Using a corpus of newspaper articles, we examine the frequency of words in different positions in sentences. That is, using data from thousands of sentences, we investigate the median value for the frequency or rank of words in first position in a sentence, compared with second position, and so on. We find that there is a frequency effect in English: the first element in a sentence has the highest frequency and last element in a sentence has the lowest frequency, with the middle of sentences having a more or less flat frequency profile. We also find that the overall shape of the frequency profile for sentences is rather consistent even when sentence length is taken into account.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bolinger, D. L.
    (1952) Linear modification. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America67, 1117–44. 10.2307/459963
    https://doi.org/10.2307/459963 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chamonikolasová, J.
    (2009) Word order and linear modification in English. Brno Studies in English35(2), 17–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chafe, W.
    (1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Du Bois, J. W.
    (1987) The discourse basis of ergativity. Language64, 805–855. 10.2307/415719
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415719 [Google Scholar]
  5. Fenk-Oczlon, G.
    (1989) Word frequency and word order in freezes. Linguistics27, 517–556. 10.1515/ling.1989.27.3.517
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1989.27.3.517 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2001) Familiarity, information flow, and linguistic form. InJ. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp.431–448). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45.22fen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.22fen [Google Scholar]
  7. Fenk-Oczlon, G. & Fenk, A.
    (2002) Zipf’s tool analogy and word order. Glottometrics5, 22–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Firbas, J.
    (1992) Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597817
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597817 [Google Scholar]
  9. Givón, T.
    (1984) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.17 [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenberg, J. H.
    (1963) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. InJ. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp.73–113). Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Haiman, J.
    (1980) The iconicity of grammar: isomorphism and motivation. Language56(3), 515–540. 10.2307/414448
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414448 [Google Scholar]
  12. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1985) An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jaeger, T. F.
    (2006) Redundancy and syntactic reduction in spontaneous speech. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  14. (2010) Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology61, 23–62. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W. D.
    (2001) Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. InJ. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp.229–254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45.13jur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.13jur [Google Scholar]
  16. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol.1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Longacre, R. E.
    (1983) The grammar of discourse. New York: Plenum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mathesius, V.
    (1975) A functional analysis of present-day English on a general linguistic basis (Ed.J. Vachek). Prague: Academia. 10.1515/9783110813296
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110813296 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mithun, M.
    (1992) Is basic word order universal?InD. Payne (Ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility (pp.15–61). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.22.02mit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.22.02mit [Google Scholar]
  21. Norrick, N. R.
    (2000) Conversational narratives: Story telling in everyday life. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.203
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.203 [Google Scholar]
  22. Payne, D.
    (1992) Nonidentifiable information and pragmatic order rules in ’O’odham. InD. Payne (Ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility (pp.137–166). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.22.06pay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.22.06pay [Google Scholar]
  23. Paul, H.
    (1920) Prinzipien der Sprachgeschicte. Halle an der Saale: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ross, J. R.
    (1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  25. Swales, J. M.
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Thompson, S. A.
    (1978) Modern English from a typological point of view: Some implications of the function of word order. Linguistische Berichte54, 19–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tomlin, R. & Rhodes, R.
    (1992) Information distribution in Ojibwa. InD. Payne (Ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility (pp.117–135). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.22.05tom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.22.05tom [Google Scholar]
  28. Zipf, G. K.
    (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): communicative dynamism; frequency; newspaper corpus; sequence
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error