1887
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In Modern Standard Chinese, word order patterns and constructions are motivated by factors and restrictions connected to different levels of linguistic organization, including not only semantics and syntax, but also pragmatics, information-structure, and the conceptual domain. The functional and the cognitive paradigms have offered distinct but complementary perspectives capable of accounting for word order patterns and regularities related to either the topic-prominent nature of Chinese or the iconic dimension of its grammar. This article shows how cognitive and functional aspects are in fact tightly intertwined and display significant and not yet fully explored parallelisms. Specifically, it looks into the notions of ‘frame’, ‘scope’, and ‘part’, features shared by both functional accounts of topic-comment structures and conceptually motivated word order principles. It proposes a qualitative corpus analysis of such notions and shows that first, Chinese topics are better defined in terms of frames; second, a number of word order regularities can be accounted for with a single cognitive-functional schema, which I refer to as , or which is connected to the image schema of . This article hopes to contribute to bridging the gap between functional studies on information structure in Chinese and perspectives offered by the cognitive approach to linguistic structures, and to offer effective tools for Chinese as a second language acquisition.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00059.mor
2020-10-01
2020-10-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amorapanth, P. ,
    (2012) Language, perception, and the schematic representation of spatial relations. Brain and Language, 120(3), 226–36. 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry, R.
    (1975) Topic in Chinese: An overlap of meaning, grammar and discourse function. In R. Grossman (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism (pp.1–9). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biq, Y.-O. , Tai, J. H.-Y. , & Thompson, S. A.
    (1996) Recent developments in functional approaches to Chinese. In C.-T. J. Huang & A. Y.-H. Li (Eds.), New horizons in Chinese Linguistics (pp.97–140). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑1608‑1_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_4 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chafe, W. L.
    (1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and points of view. In C. Li (Eds.), Subject and topic (pp.25–55). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chao, Y.
    (1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chappell, H.
    (1996) Inalienability and the personal domain in Mandarin Chinese discourse. In H. Chappell & W. McGregor (Eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part terms and the part-whole relation (pp.465–528). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110822137.465
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822137.465 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, P.
    (1996) Pragmatic interpretation of structural topic and relativization in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics26, 389–406. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00042‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00042-9 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, R.
    (1995) Communicative dynamism and word order in Mandarin Chinese. Language Sciences, 17(2), 201–222. 10.1016/0388‑0001(95)00010‑S
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(95)00010-S [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Y. , Lee, P. , & Pan, H.
    (2016) Topic and focus marking in Chinese. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp.733–752). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng, R. L.
    (1967) Universe-scope relations and Mandarin noun phrases. Project on linguistic analysis, Series 2, (3) (pp.1–182). Columbus: Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chu, C. (屈承熹)
    (1999) Hanyu renzhi gongneng yufa汉语认知功能语法 (Cognitive-functional grammar of Mandarin Chinese). Taipei: The Crane Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cook, H. M.
    (1993) Schematic values of the Japanese nominal particles “wa” and “ga.” In R. A. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and mental processing in language (pp.371–397). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Erteschik-Shir, N.
    (2007) Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Firbas, J.
    (1992) Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597817
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597817 [Google Scholar]
  15. Güldemann, T. , Zerbian, S. , & Zimmermann, M.
    (2015) Variation in information structure with special reference to Africa. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1(1), 155–178. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑125134
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125134 [Google Scholar]
  16. Haiman, J.
    (1978) Conditionals are topics. Language, 54(3), 564–589. 10.1353/lan.1978.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1978.0009 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1985) Introduction. In J. Haiman (Eds.), Iconicity in syntax: Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, June 24–6, 1983. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.6.01hai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.01hai [Google Scholar]
  18. Her, O.-S.
    (1991) Topic as a grammatical function in Chinese. Lingua, 84(1), 1–23. 10.1016/0024‑3841(91)90011‑S
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(91)90011-S [Google Scholar]
  19. Ho, Y.
    (1993) Aspects of discourse structure in Mandarin Chinese. Lewiston, Queenston, and Lampeter: Mellen University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hockett, C.
    (1958) A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1958.tb00870.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1958.tb00870.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Householder, F. W. , & Cheng, R. L.
    (1967) Universe-scope relations in Chinese and Japanese. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hu, W.
    (1995) Functional perspectives and Chinese word order. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University.
  23. Huang, Y.
    (2000) Anaphora: A cross-linguistic approach. Vol.3. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kemmer, S. , Barlow, M.
    (2000) Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In S. Kemmer & M. Barlow (Eds.), Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (2003) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lambrecht, K.
    (1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  29. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford (Calif.): Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. LaPolla, R. J.
    (1995) Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In P. Downing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.30.11lap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.30.11lap [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, C. N. , & Thompson, S. A.
    (1976) Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In C. N. Li (Eds.), Subject and topic (pp.457–489). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, W.
    (2005) The topic chains in Chinese: A discourse analysis and application in language teaching. München: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Loar, J. K.
    (2011) Chinese syntactic grammar: Functional and conceptual principles. New York: Peter Lang Pub Inc. 10.3726/978‑1‑4539‑0514‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-0514-2 [Google Scholar]
  35. Morbiato, A.
    (2018) How subjective is the subject?Annali Di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Orientale, 54(1), 319–348.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2019) Conceptual word order principles and Mandarin Chinese grammar. In C. Shei (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315213705‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213705-6 [Google Scholar]
  37. Oakley, T.
    (2010) Image schemas. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Paul, W.
    (2015) New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338775
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338775 [Google Scholar]
  39. Prince, E. F.
    (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Eds.), Radical pragmatics (pp.223–255). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pu, M.
    (2019) Zero anaphora and topic chain in Chinese discourse. In C. Shei (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315213705‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213705-13 [Google Scholar]
  41. Siewierska, A.
    (1988) Word order rules. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tai, J. H.
    (1985) Temporal sequence and word order in Chinese. In J. Haiman (Eds.), Iconicity in syntax (pp.49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.6.04tai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.04tai [Google Scholar]
  43. (1989) Toward a cognition-based functional grammar of Chinese. In J. Tai & F. Hsueh (Eds.), Functionalism and Chinese grammar, 1, (pp.187–226). South Orange, NJ: Chinese Language Teachers Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (1993) Iconicity: Motivations in Chinese grammar. In M. Eid & G. Iverson (Eds.), Principles and prediction: The analysis of natural language (pp.153–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cilt.98.14tai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.98.14tai [Google Scholar]
  45. Tao, H.
    (1996) Units in Mandarin conversation: Prosody, discourse, and grammar. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sidag.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.5 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tsao, F. (曹逢甫)
    (1985) Zhuti zai hanyu zhong de gongneng yanjiu主题在汉语中的功能研究——迈向语段分析的第一步 (A functional study of topic in Chinese). Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (1990) Sentence and clause structure in Chinese: A Functional perspective. Taipei, Taiwan: Student Book Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. von Prince, K.
    (2012) Predication and information structure in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 21(4), 329–366. 10.1007/s10831‑012‑9091‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-012-9091-x [Google Scholar]
  49. Wu, G.
    (1998) Information structure in Chinese. Peking: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu, L.
    (2015) Topic prominence. In W. Wang , & C. Sun (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of Chinese Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00059.mor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00059.mor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error