Metonymy

References

1. Bargh, J. A. & Chartrand, T. L.
   (1999) The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479. 10.1037/0003‑066X.54.7.462
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462 [Google Scholar]
2. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F.
   (1992) The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893–912. 10.1037/0022‑3514.62.6.893
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.893 [Google Scholar]
3. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C.
   (1996) The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditionally automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 185–210. 10.1006/jesp.1996.0005
   https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0005 [Google Scholar]
4. Bindra, D., & Thompson, W. R.
   (1953) An evaluation of defecating and urinating as measures of fearfulness. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 46, 43–45.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bossert, W. H., & Wilson, E. O.
   (1963) The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 5, 443–469. 10.1016/0022‑5193(63)90089‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(63)90089-4 [Google Scholar]
6. Croft, William
   (2003) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In: Dirven, René & Pörings, Ralf (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp.161–206). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Groot, Jasper H. B., and Monique A. M. Smeets
   (2017) Human fear chemosignaling: Evidence from a meta-Analysis. Chemical Senses, 42(8), 663–673. 10.1093/chemse/bjx049
   https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjx049 [Google Scholar]
8. Dirven, René
   (2003) Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualisationIn: Dirven, René & Pörings, Ralf (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp.75–112). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219197.1.75
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.1.75 [Google Scholar]
9. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, J.
   (1949) Über das Vorkommen von Schreckstoffen bei Erdkrötenquappen. Experientia, 5, 236. 10.1007/BF02166898
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02166898 [Google Scholar]
10. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M.
    (2000) The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17. 10.1002/(SICI)1099‑0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID‑BDM333>3.0.CO;2‑S
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S [Google Scholar]
11. Frisch, K. V.
    (1941) Über einen Schreckstoff der Fischhaut und seine biologische Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie, 29, 46–145. 10.1007/BF00304445
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304445 [Google Scholar]
12. Frühling, A.
    (1955) Über das Harnspritzen und ähnliche Verhaltensweisen beim Meerschweinchen. Säugetierkunde Mitteilungen, 3, 168–171.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gigerenzer, G.
    (2007) Gut feelings. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hassin, R. R., Aarts, H., & Ferguson, M. J.
    (2005) Automatic goal inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 129–140. 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.008 [Google Scholar]
15. Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C.
    (1999) Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(7), 809–818. 10.1177/0146167299025007004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025007004 [Google Scholar]
16. Haslam, S. Alexander, Turner, John C., Oakes, Penelope J., Reynolds, Katherine J. and Doosje, Bertjan
    (2002) From personal pictures in the head to collective tools in the world: how shared stereotypes allow groups to represent and change social reality. In: Craig McGarty, (Eds.), Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups (pp.157–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511489877.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489877.009 [Google Scholar]
17. Herrero-Ruiz, Javier
    (2009) Understanding tropes: at the crossroads between pragmatics and cognition. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Herrero-Ruiz, Javier
    (2018) Exaggerating and mitigating through metonymy: The case of situational and cause for effect/effect for cause metonymies. Language and Communication62, 51–65. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.07.001 [Google Scholar]
19. Hessler, Peter
    (2001) River town: two years on the Yangtze. New York: Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hrbacek, I.
    (1950) On the flight reaction of the tadpoles of the common toad caused by chemical substances. Experientia, 6, 100–101. 10.1007/BF02153372
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02153372 [Google Scholar]
21. Kövecses, Zoltán, & Radden, Günter
    (1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78. 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
22. Kuo, Tsung-Han, Joanne Y. Yew, Tatyana Y. Fedina, Klaus Dreisewerd, Herman A. Dierick, Scott D. Pletcher
    (2012) Aging modulates cuticular hydrocarbons and sexual attractiveness in Drosophila melanogaster. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 215, 814–821. 10.1242/jeb.064980
    https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.064980 [Google Scholar]
23. Lakoff, George
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
24. Langacker, Ronald W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford California, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Langacker, Ronald W.
    (1984) Active zones. Berkeley Linguistics Society10, 172-188. 10.3765/bls.v10i0.3175
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v10i0.3175 [Google Scholar]
26. Langacker, Ronald W.
    (1993) Reference-point Constructions. Cognitive Linguistics4(1). 1-38. 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1 [Google Scholar]
27. Littlemore, Jeannette
    2015 Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107338814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814 [Google Scholar]
28. Lübke, Katrin T., and Bettina M. Pause
    (2015) Always follow your nose: the functional significance of social chemosignals in human reproduction and survival. Hormones and Behavior, 9.4, E94314. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.10.001 [Google Scholar]
29. Lübke, K. T., Busch, A., Hoenen, M., Schaal, B. & Pause, B. M.
    (2017) Chemosensory anxiety signals prime defensive behavior in prepubertal girls. Physiology & Behavior, 173, 30–33. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.01.035
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.01.035 [Google Scholar]
30. McRae, Mary
    (2004) How do I talk to you, my white sister?Center for Gender in Organizations Commentaries, 2, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Moran, James K., Daniel R. Dietrich, Thomas Elbert, Bettina M. Pause, Lisa Kübler, Roland Weierstall, and Heather Hoffmann
    (2015) The scent of blood: A driver of human Behavior?PLoS ONE10(9), E0137777. 10.1371/journal.pone.0137777
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137777 [Google Scholar]
32. Müller-Velten, H.
    (1966) Über den Angstgeruch bei der Hausmaus. Zeitschrift Vergleichende Physiologie, 52, 401–429. 10.1007/BF00302294
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302294 [Google Scholar]
33. Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C.
    (1994) Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Patin, Alexandra, & Pause, Bettina M.
    (2015) Human amygdala activations during nasal chemoreception. Neuropsychologia, 78, 171–194. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.009 [Google Scholar]
35. Pfeiffer, W.
    (1960) Über die Verbreitung der Schreckreaktion bei Fischen. Naturwissenschaften, 47(1), 23. 10.1007/BF00628470
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628470 [Google Scholar]
36. Pfeiffer, W.
    (1963) Alarm substances. Experientia, 19, 113–123. 10.1007/BF02171582
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02171582 [Google Scholar]
37. Prehn-Kristensen, Alexander, Christian Wiesner, Til Ole Bergmann, Stephan Wolff, Olav Jansen, Hubertus Maximilian Mehdorn, Roman Ferstl, Bettina M. Pause, and Jan Lauwereyns
    (2009) Induction of empathy by the smell of anxiety. PLoS ONE4.6, E5987. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005987
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005987 [Google Scholar]
38. Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J.
    (2005) Linguistic interpretation and cognition. In: E. Croitoru, D. Tuchel & M. Praisler (Eds.), Cultural matrix reloaded. Romanian Society for English and American Studies Seventh International Conference (pp.36–64). Bucarest: Didactica Si Pedagogica.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Schaller, M., & Maass, A.
    (1989) Illusory correlation and social categorization: Toward an integration of motivational and cognitive factors in stereotype formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 709–721. 10.1037/0022‑3514.56.5.709
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.709 [Google Scholar]
40. Skinner, W. A., R. D. Mathews, and R. M. Parkhurst
    (1962) Alarm reaction of the top smelt Atherinops affinis (Ayres). Science138, 681–682. 10.1126/science.138.3541.681
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.138.3541.681 [Google Scholar]
41. Spears, Russell, & Manstead, A. S. R.
    (1989) The social context of stereotyping and differentiation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19(2), 101–121. 10.1002/ejsp.2420190203
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420190203 [Google Scholar]
42. Sprott, Richard L.
    (1969) “Fear communication” via odor in inbred mice. Psychological Report, 25, 263–268. 10.2466/pr0.1969.25.1.263
    https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1969.25.1.263 [Google Scholar]
43. Tajfel, Henri
    (1969) Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Biosocial Science Suppl, 1, 173–191. 10.1017/S0021932000023336
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932000023336 [Google Scholar]
44. Tajfel, Henri
    (1981) Human groups and social categories: studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Taylor, John R.
    (2003) Category extension by metonymy and metaphor. In: Dirven, René & Pörings, Ralf (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp.323–348). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Wisman, Arnaud, and IlanShrira
    (2015) The Smell of Death: Evidence That Putrescine Elicits Threat Management Mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1274. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01274
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01274 [Google Scholar]
47. Wyatt, Tristram D.
    (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615061
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615061 [Google Scholar]
48. Zajonc, R. B.
    (1980) Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175. 10.1037/0003‑066X.35.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151 [Google Scholar]
49. Zhou, Wen & Chen, Denise
    (2009) Fear-Related chemosignalsmodulate recognition of fear in ambiguous facial expressions. Psychological Science, 20(2), 177. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02263.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02263.x [Google Scholar]
50. Zhou, Wen, & Chen, Denise
    (2011) Entangled chemosensory emotion and identity: Familiarity enhances detection of chemosensorily encoded Emotion. Social Neuroscience, 6(3), 270–276. 10.1080/17470919.2010.523537
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.523537 [Google Scholar]