1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Cognitive Linguistic Studies
  4. Volume 8, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Metaphors play an important role in contemporary approaches to grief therapy by helping clients (re)construe their continuing relationship with the deceased. Relevant studies have illustrated the substantive elements of metaphors (i.e. sources, targets, and mappings) in this regard, often focusing on localized bursts of intense metaphoric activity. This paper highlights the extended nature of metaphoric conceptualizations and their relationship with key meaning-making processes, following the principle of ‘correspondent analysis’ as a collaborative move between language analysts and therapy practitioners. Three specific phenomena are detailed through a mixed methods analysis of 18 motivated segments in a single session of grief therapy: (i) sporadic sources, (ii) persistent sources, and (iii) metaphor ‘chaining’ across embodied and verbal activity. Their respective links to treatment objectives and processes demonstrate how metaphor theoretic constructs dovetail with therapeutic work, and suggest future avenues for modeling unfolding metaphoric activity as a time series.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00070.tay
2021-09-08
2023-09-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00070.tay
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Burke, L. A., Clark, K. A., Ali, K. S., Gibson, B. W., Smigelsky, M. A., & Neimeyer, R. A.
    (2015) Risk factors for anticipatory grief in family members of terminally ill veterans receiving palliative care services. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life and Palliative Care, 11, 244–266. 10.1080/15524256.2015.1110071
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2015.1110071 [Google Scholar]
  2. Cameron, L., & Maslen, R.
    (Eds.) (2010) Metaphor analysis. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Currier, J. M., Holland, J. M., & Neimeyer, R. A.
    (2006) Sense making, grief and the experience of violent loss: Toward a mediational model. Death Studies, 30, 403–428. 10.1080/07481180600614351
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180600614351 [Google Scholar]
  4. Dodge, E., & Lakoff, G.
    (2005) Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. InB. Hampe & J. Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp.57–92). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197532.1.57
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.1.57 [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibbs, R. W., & Matlock, T.
    (2008) Metaphor, imagination and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. InR. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.011 [Google Scholar]
  6. Grady, J.
    (1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. University of California, Berkerley.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Hedtke, L.
    (2012) Introducing the deceased. InR. A. Neimeyer (Ed.), Techniques of grief therapy: Creative practices for counseling the bereaved (pp.253–255). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Hooghe, A., Neimeyer, R. A., & Rober, P.
    (2012) “Cycling around an emotional core of sadness”: Emotion regulation in a couple after the loss of a child. Qualitative Health Research, 22(9), 1220–1231. 10.1177/1049732312449209
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312449209 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimmel, M.
    (2012) Optimizing the analysis of metaphor in discourse: How to make the most of qualitative software and find a good research design. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 1–48. 10.1075/rcl.10.1.01kim
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.10.1.01kim [Google Scholar]
  10. Klass, D., Silverman, P., & Nickman, S.
    (Eds.) (1996) Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. New York: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Kübler-Ross, E.
    (1969) On death and dying. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenges to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Mathieson, F., Jordan, J., Carter, J., & Stubbe, M.
    (2015) Nailing down metaphors in CBT: Definition, identification and frequency. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 44(2), 236–248. 10.1017/S1352465815000156
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465815000156 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mergenthaler, E.
    (1996) Emotion-Abstraction patterns in verbatim protocols: A new way of describing psycho-therapeutic processes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1306–1315. 10.1037/0022‑006X.64.6.1306
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1306 [Google Scholar]
  15. Neimeyer, R. A.
    (2012) Analogical listening. InR. A. Neimeyer (Ed.), Techniques of grief therapy: Creative practices for counseling the bereaved (pp.55–58). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Neimeyer, R. A., & Mahoney, M. J.
    (1995) Constructivism in psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10170‑000
     https://doi.org/10.1037/10170-000 [Google Scholar]
  17. Neimeyer, R. A., & Thompson, B. E.
    (2014) Meaning making and the art of grief therapy. InB. E. Thompson & R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.), Grief and the expressive arts: Practices for creating meaning (pp.3–13). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  19. Rynearson, E. K.
    (2012) Invoking an alliance with the deceased after violent death. InR. A. Neimeyer (Ed.), Techniques of grief therapy (pp.91–94). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Semino, E.
    (2010) Descriptions of pain, metaphor, and embodied simulation. Metaphor and Symbol, 25(4), 205–226. 10.1080/10926488.2010.510926
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2010.510926 [Google Scholar]
  21. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  22. Tay, D.
    (2013) Metaphor in psychotherapy. A descriptive and prescriptive analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.1 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2014) Metaphor theory for counselling professionals. InJ. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp.352–367). London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. (2015) Metaphor in case study articles on Chinese university counseling service websites. Chinese Language and Discourse, 6(1), 28–56. 10.1075/cld.6.1.02tay
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.6.1.02tay [Google Scholar]
  25. (2016) Metaphor and psychological transference. Metaphor & Symbol, 31(1), 11–30. 10.1080/10926488.2016.1116903
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1116903 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2017a) Exploring the metaphor–body–psychotherapy relationship. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(3), 178–191. 10.1080/10926488.2017.1338021
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1338021 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2017b) The nuances of metaphor theory for constructivist psychotherapy. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 30(2), 165–181. 10.1080/10720537.2016.1161571
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2016.1161571 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2017c) Time series analysis of discourse. A case study of metaphor in psychotherapy sessions. Discourse Studies, 19(6), 694–710. 10.1177/1461445617727187
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617727187 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2019a) Metaphor response categories and distribution between therapists and clients: A case study in the Chinese context. Journal of Constructivist Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:  10.1080/10720537.2019.1697913
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2019.1697913 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2019b) Time series analysis of discourse. Method and Case Studies. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. (2020) A computerized text and cluster analysis approach to psychotherapy talk. Language & Psychoanalysis, 9(1), 1–22. 10.7565/landp.v9i1.1701
     https://doi.org/10.7565/landp.v9i1.1701 [Google Scholar]
  32. Törneke, N.
    (2017) Metaphor in practice. A professional’s guide to using the science of language in psychotherapy. Oakland: New Harbinger.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00070.tay
Loading
Making meaning with metaphor in grief therapy
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8, 152 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00070.tay
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00070.tay
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00070.tay
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): grief therapy; meaning making; metaphor

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error