1887
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Most languages which code possession morphologically do so by using either prefixes or suffixes. This study examines the minority of languages which employ both prefixes and suffixes in order to express the contrast between alienable and inalienable possession. The focus is on a possible interaction of affix order type and possession type. An analysis of a dozen Malayo-Polynesian languages (8 Eastern Malayo-Polynesian and 4 Central Malayo-Polynesian) reveals a surprisingly consistent pattern. Ten of these languages consistently associate prefixes with alienable possession and suffixes with inalienable possession. None of the 12 languages does it the other way around. This form-meaning relationship is argued to be iconically motivated. Suffixes are claimed to be more closely linked to their stems than prefixes are. This formal closeness mirrors the tighter relationship between possessor and possessum in inalienable than in alienable possession. Five languages make a three-way contrast among inalienable, intermediate and alienable possession. This suggests that the distinction between alienable and inalienable possession should be viewed as a continuum rather than a dichotomy. Individual languages may split up this continuum in different ways.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00089.ber
2022-05-30
2024-05-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, A. Y.
    (2013) Possession and ownership: a cross-linguistic perspective. InA. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Possession and ownership. A cross-linguistic typology (pp.1–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2019) Expressing ‘possession’. InL. Johanson, L. F. Mazzitelli & I. Nevskaya (Eds.), Possession in languages of Europe and North and Central Asia (pp.7–25). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.206.02aik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.206.02aik [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg, T.
    (2003) Right-branching in English derivational morphology. English Language and Linguistics, 7, 279–307. 10.1017/S1360674303001114
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674303001114 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2015) Locating affixes on the lexicon-grammar continuum. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 2, 150–180. 10.1075/cogls.2.1.08ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.2.1.08ber [Google Scholar]
  5. (2020) Ordering biases in cross-linguistic perspective: The interaction of serial order and structural level. Linguistic Typology, 24, 353–397. 10.1515/lingty‑2019‑2031
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-2031 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blust, R.
    (2013) The Austronesian languages. Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolton, R. A.
    (1990) A preliminary description of Nuaulu phonology and grammar. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Arlington: The University of Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Booij, G. & Rubach, J.
    (1984) Morphological and prosodic domains in Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 1, 1–27. 10.1017/S0952675700000270
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000270 [Google Scholar]
  9. Collins, J. T.
    (1983a) Syntactic change in Ambonese Malay: The possessive construction. InJ. T. Collins (Ed.), Studies in Malay dialects. Part II (pp.28–41). Jacarta Selatan: Linguistic Studies of Indonesian (NUSA 17).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1983b) The historical relationships of the languages of Central Maluku, Indonesia. Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. De Beaugrande, R. & Dressler, W. U.
    (1981) Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman. 10.4324/9781315835839
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835839 [Google Scholar]
  12. Devylder, S.
    (2018) Diagrammatic iconicity explains asymmetries in Paamese possessive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 29, 313–348. 10.1515/cog‑2017‑0058
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0058 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dryer, M. S.
    (2013) Prefixing and suffixing in inflectional morphology. InM. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ezard, J.
    (1971) Stems and words in Iamalele. Typescript. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Geraghty, P.
    (2000) Possession in Fijian languages. Language Typology and Universals, 53, 243–250. 10.1524/stuf.2000.53.34.243
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2000.53.34.243 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2002) Nadroga. InJ. Lynch, M. Ross & T. Crowley (Eds.), The Oceanic languages (pp.833–847). Richmond: Curzon.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haiman, J.
    (1983) Iconic and economic motivation. Language, 59, 781–819. 10.2307/413373
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413373 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2008) In defense of iconicity. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 35–48. 10.1515/COG.2008.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Han, E.
    (1993) The phonological word in Korean. InP. M. Clancy (Ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Vol.2 (pp.117–129). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Communication.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Haspelmath, M.
    (2008) Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 1–33. 10.1515/COG.2008.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2017) Explaining alienability contrasts in adpossessive constructions: predictability vs. iconicity. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 36, 193–231. 10.1515/zfs‑2017‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2017-0009 [Google Scholar]
  22. Haywood, G.
    (1996) A Maleu grammar outline and text. InM. D. Ross (Ed.), Studies in languages of New Britain and New Ireland. Vol.1 (pp.145–196). Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hopper, P. J. & Closs Traugott, E.
    (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hyman, L. M.
    (2009) The natural history of verb-stem reduplication in Bantu. Morphology19, 177–206. 10.1007/s11525‑009‑9140‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-009-9140-y [Google Scholar]
  25. Jackson, J. A. J.
    (2014) A grammar of Irarutu, a language of West Papua, Indonesia, with historical analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M.
    (1996) Possessive noun phrases in Maltese: Alienability, iconicity and grammaticalization. Rivista di Linguistica, 8, 245–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Laidig, W. D.
    (1993) Insights from Larike possessive constructions. Oceanic Linguistics, 32, 311–351. 10.2307/3623197
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3623197 [Google Scholar]
  28. Leeding, V. J.
    (1996) Body parts and possession in Anindilyakwa. InH. Chappell & W. McGregor (Eds.), The grammar of inalienability (pp.193–249). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110822137.193
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822137.193 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lichtenberk, F.
    (1985) Possessive constructions in Oceanic languages and in Proto-Oceanic. InA. Pawley & L. Carrington (Eds.), Austronesian linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress (pp.93–140). Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lichtenberk, F., Vaid, J. & Chen, H.-C.
    (2011) On the interpretation of alienable vs. inalienable possession: A psycholinguistic investigation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 659–689. 10.1515/cogl.2011.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.025 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lithgow, D. R.
    (1976) Austronesian languages: Milne Bay and adjacent islands. InS. A. Wurm (Ed.), New Guinea languages and language study. Vol.2 (pp.441–523). Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lithgow, D.
    (1988) Bunama grammar. Typescript. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lithgow, D. & D. Lithgow
    (1974) Dictionaries of Papua New Guinea: Vol. 1: Muyuw language. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lynch, J.
    (1997) On the origins of the possessive markers in Central Pacific languages. Oceanic Linguistics, 36, 227–246. 10.2307/3622986
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3622986 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lynch, J., Ross, M. & Crowley, T.
    (Eds.) (2002) The Oceanic languages. Richmond: Curzon.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Morley, E. A.
    (2010) A grammar of Ajagbe. Munich: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Müller, A.
    (1954) Grammar and vocabulary of the Konua language. Fosieux, Switzerland: Anthropos.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Nespor, M. & Vogel, I.
    (1986) Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nichols, J.
    (2013) Possessive classification. InM. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Niggemeyer, H.
    (1951) Alune-Sprache: Texte, Wörterverzeichnis und Grammatik einer Sprache West-Cerams. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 76, 50–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Nikiforidou, K.
    (1991) The meaning of the genitive: A case study in semantic structure and semantic change. Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 149–205. 10.1515/cogl.1991.2.2.149
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1991.2.2.149 [Google Scholar]
  42. Olson, C.
    (1992) Gumawana (Amphlett Islands, Papua New Guinea): Grammar sketch and dictionary. InM. D. Ross (Ed.), Papers in Austronesian linguistics. Vol.2 (pp.251–430). Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pawley, A. & Sayaba, T.
    (1990) Possessive-marking in Wayan, a Western Fijian language: noun class or relational system?InJ. H. C. S. Davidson (Ed.), Pacific island languages: essays in honour of G.B. Milner (pp.147–171). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Radin, P.
    (1929) A grammar of the Wappo language. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Senft, G.
    (1986) Kilivila. The language of the Trobriand Islanders. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110861846
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110861846 [Google Scholar]
  46. Stresemann, E.
    (1918) Die Paulohisprache. ‘s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tryon, D.
    (2002) Numa. InJ. Lynch, M. Ross & T. Crowley (Eds.). The Oceanic languages (pp.573–586). Richmond: Curzon.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. van den Berg, R. & Matsumura, T.
    (2008) Possession in Irarutu. Oceanic Linguistics, 47, 213–222. 10.1353/ol.0.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. van den Berg, R. & Wiebe, B.
    (2019) Bola grammar sketch. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics. (Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages, Vol. 63).
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wakefield, D.
    (1975) Grammar notes on Arifama-Miniafia. Typescript. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wennerström, A.
    (1993) Focus on the prefix: evidence for word-internal prosodic words. Phonology, 10, 309–324. 10.1017/S0952675700000075
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000075 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wilson, W. H.
    (1982) Proto-Polynesian possessive marking. Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00089.ber
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error