The perspective of the other

References

1. Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S.
   (2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. 10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre [Google Scholar]
2. Brezina, V., Timperley, M., & McEnery, A.
   (2018) #LancsBox v.4.x. Retrieved fromcorpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox/download.php
3. Culler, J.
   (2015) Theory of the lyric. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674425781
   https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674425781 [Google Scholar]
4. Culpeper, J.
   (2009) Keyness: Words, parts-of-speech and semantic categories in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(1), 29–59. 10.1075/ijcl.14.1.03cul
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.1.03cul [Google Scholar]
5. Curran, S.
   (2010) Romantic elegiac hybridity. InK. Weisman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the elegy (pp.238–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199228133.013.0014
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199228133.013.0014 [Google Scholar]
6. Duhaime, D.
   (2014) Identifying poetry in unstructured corpora. Retrieved fromhttps://douglasduhaime.com/posts/identifying-poetry-in-unstructured-corpora.html
7. Eve, M. P.
   (2022) The digital humanities and literary studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198850489.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850489.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
8. Evert, S.
   (2009) Corpora and collocations. InA. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (volume 2) (pp.1212–1248). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213881.2.1212
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213881.2.1212 [Google Scholar]
9. Gibbons, A., & Whiteley, S.
   (2018) Contemporary stylistics: Language, cognition, interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748682782
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748682782 [Google Scholar]
10. Hunston, S.
    (2002) Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
11. István, S.
    (1997) Műfajelmélet mindenkinek [Genre theory for everyone]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Labádi, G.
    (2019) Géppel mért irodalom: A mikszáthi élőbeszédszerűség [Machine-readable literature: “Spoken language” in Mikszáth’s short stories]. Digitális Bölcsészet, 21, 3–19. 10.31400/dh‑hun.2019.2.390
    https://doi.org/10.31400/dh-hun.2019.2.390 [Google Scholar]
13. Lennard, J.
    (2006) The poetry handbook (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
    (2012) Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Miller, P. A.
    (2010) ‘What’s love got to do with it?’: The peculiar story of elegy in Rome. InK. Weisman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the elegy (pp.46–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199228133.013.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199228133.013.0003 [Google Scholar]
16. Moretti, F.
    (2013) Distant reading. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Moses, O.
    (2018) Poetry and the environmentally extended mind. New Literary History, 49(3), 309–335. 10.1353/nlh.2018.0022
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2018.0022 [Google Scholar]
18. Rounds, C. H.
    (2001) Hungarian: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Rychlý, P.
    (2008) A Lexicographer-friendly association score. InP. Sojka & A. Horák (Eds.), Recent advances in Slavonic natural language processing (pp.6–9). Brno: Masaryk University.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Sharifian, F.
    (2008) Distributed, emergent cultural cognition, conceptualisation and language. InR. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind: Vol. 2: Sociocultural situatedness (pp.109–136). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199116.1.109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199116.1.109 [Google Scholar]
21. Simon, G.
    (2017) “Hová lettél, hová levél”: Az idő nyelvi megformálása Arany János elégikus költészetében [“Where have you gone, where have you been going”: The construal of temporality in the elegiac poetry of János Arany]. Magyar Nyelv, 1131, 420–432. 10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2017.4.420
    https://doi.org/10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2017.4.420 [Google Scholar]
22. Simon, G., & Tátrai, S.
    (2017) “Tőlem ne várjon senki dalt”: Az elégikus líramodell kidolgozása Arany János költészetében [“None should now expect a song of mine”: On elaborating the elegiac model of lyric poetry of János Arany]. Magyar Nyelvőr, 1411, 164–190.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sőtér, I.
    (Ed.) (1978) A magyar irodalom története (Vol.4–61) [The History of Hungarian Literature]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
25. Stockwell, P.
    (2009) Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748631209
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748631209 [Google Scholar]
26. Stubbs, M.
    (2014) Quantitative methods in literary linguistics. InP. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of stylistics (pp.46–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139237031.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139237031.005 [Google Scholar]
27. Waters, W.
    (2003) Poetry’s Touch. On Lyric Address. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501717062
    https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501717062 [Google Scholar]
28. Weisman, K.
    (2010) Introduction. InK. Weisman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the elegy (pp.1–10). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199228133.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199228133.001.0001 [Google Scholar]