Cultural models mediating between visual sensation and semiotic systems, exemplified on visual, alpha-pictorial and verbal-gestural communication

References

1. Ahluwalia, A.
   (1978) An intra-cultural investigation of susceptibility to ‘perspective’ and ‘non-perspective’ spatial illusions. British Journal of Psychology, 69(2), 233–241. 10.1111/j.2044‑8295.1978.tb01653.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1978.tb01653.x [Google Scholar]
2. Appelbaum, R.
   (2006) Aguecheek’s beef, belch’s hiccup, and other gastronomic interjections: Literature, culture, and food among the early moderns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226021287.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226021287.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
3. Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D.
   (2006) See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 612–625. 10.1037/0022‑3514.91.4.612
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.612 [Google Scholar]
4. Barcelona, A.
   (2000a) Introduction: The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive perspective (pp.1–28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barcelona, A.
   (2000b) On the plausibility of claiming a métonymie motivation for conceptual metaphor. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive perspective (pp.31–58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barcelona, A.
   (2022) Purely inferential metonymies. Plenary talk atAELCO 12, June 27–29, Logroño, University of La Rioja.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barthes, R.
   (1972) Critical essays. (R. Howard, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Berry, J. W.
   (1968) Ecology, perceptual development and the Müller-Lyer illusion. British Journal of Psychology, 59(3), 205–210. 10.1111/j.2044‑8295.1968.tb01134.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1968.tb01134.x [Google Scholar]
9. Brdar, M.
   (2017) Metonymy and word-formation: Their interactions and complementation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brdar, M.
    (2019) On the regularity of metonymy across languages (exemplified on some metonymies in medical discourse). ExELL. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, 7(1), 52–69. 10.2478/exell‑2020‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.2478/exell-2020-0006 [Google Scholar]
11. Brdar, M.
    (2021) Walking gastrolinguistic landscapes, with metonymy as a travel-guide. Collegium Antropologicum, 45(4), 307–317. 10.5671/ca.45.4.3
    https://doi.org/10.5671/ca.45.4.3 [Google Scholar]
12. Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
    (2007) When Zidane is not simply Zidane, and Bill Gates is not just Bill Gates: Some thoughts on the construction of metaphtonymic meanings of proper names. InG. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp.125–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.136.09brd
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.09brd [Google Scholar]
13. Brdar-Szabó, R., & Brdar, M.
    (2021) Metonymic indeterminacy and metalepsis: Getting two (or more) targets for the price of one vehicle. InA. Soares da Silva (Ed.), Figurative language – Intersubjectivity and usage (pp.175–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.11.06brd
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.11.06brd [Google Scholar]
14. Burenhult, N., & Levinson, S. C.
    (2008) Language and landscape: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language Sciences, 30(2–3), 135–150. 10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.028
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.028 [Google Scholar]
15. D’Andrade, R.
    (1987) A folk model of the mind. InD. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp.112–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607660.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.006 [Google Scholar]
16. David, O., Lakoff, G., & Stickles, E.
    (2016) Cascades in metaphor and grammar: A case study of metaphors in the gun debate. Constructions and Frames, 8(2), 214–255. 10.1075/cf.8.2.04dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.2.04dav [Google Scholar]
17. Deręgowski, J. B.
    (1998) W. H. R. Rivers (1864–1922): The founder of research in cross-cultural perception. Perception, 27(12), 1393–1406. 10.1068/p271393
    https://doi.org/10.1068/p271393 [Google Scholar]
18. Forceville, C.
    (2009) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp.19–44). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366.1.19
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.1.19 [Google Scholar]
19. Freeman, M. B.
    (1957) The iconography of the Merode Altarpiece. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, 16(4), 130–139. 10.2307/3257688
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3257688 [Google Scholar]
20. Geeraerts, D.
    (2003) Cultural models of linguistic standardization. InR. Dirven, R. Frank & M. Pütz (Eds.), Cognitive models in language and thought: Ideology, metaphors and meanings (pp.25–68). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110892901.25
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892901.25 [Google Scholar]
21. de Jorio, A.
    (2000) Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity: A translation of Andrea de Jorio’s La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire napoletano. (A. Kendon, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jahoda, G.
    (1966) Geometric illusions and environment: A study in Ghana. British Journal of Psychology, 57(1–2), 193–199. 10.1111/j.2044‑8295.1966.tb01019.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1966.tb01019.x [Google Scholar]
23. Jahoda, G.
    (1971) Retinal pigmentation, illusion susceptibility and space perception. International Journal of Psychology, 6(3), 199–207. 10.1080/00207597108246683
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00207597108246683 [Google Scholar]
24. Kemperdick, S.
    (1997) Der meister von Flémalle: Die werkstatt Robert Campins und Rogier van der Weyden [The master of Flémalle: The workshop of Robert Campin and Rogier de Weyden]. Turnhout: Brepols.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kövecses, Z.
    (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
26. Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
    (1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78. 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
27. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McCloud, S.
    (1993) Understanding comics: The invisible art. Northampton: HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Minott, C. I.
    (1969) The theme of the Mérode Altarpiece. The Art Bulletin, 51(3), 267–271.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mittelberg, I.
    (2019) Visuo-kinetic signs are inherently metonymic: How embodied metonymy motivates forms, functions, and schematic patterns in gesture. Frontiers in Psychology, 101, Article 254. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00254
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00254 [Google Scholar]
31. Müller-Lyer, F. C.
    (1889) Optische urteilstäuschungen [Optical illusions]. Archiv für Physiologie, Suppl. 1889, 263–270.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Panofsky, E.
    (1966) Early Netherlandish painting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Panther, K.-U.
    (2005) The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. InF. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp.353–386). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197716.4.353
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197716.4.353 [Google Scholar]
34. Pollack, R. H., & Silvar, S. D.
    (1967) Magnitude of the Mueller-Lyer illusion in children as a function of pigmentation of the Fundus oculi. Psychonomic Science, 81, 83–84. 10.3758/BF03330678
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330678 [Google Scholar]
35. Polzenhagen, F., & Dirven, R.
    (2008) Rationalist or romantic model in globalisation?. InG. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp.237–300). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199154.3.237
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199154.3.237 [Google Scholar]
36. Quinn, N., & Holland, D.
    (1987) Culture and cognition. InD. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp.3–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607660.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.002 [Google Scholar]
37. Radden, G.
    (2001) The folk model of language. Metaphorik.de, 11, 55–86.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Reuterswärd, P.
    (1998) New light on Robert Campin. Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History, 67(1), 43–54. 10.1080/00233609808604449
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00233609808604449 [Google Scholar]
39. Ridderbos, B.
    (2022) Choices and intentions in the Mérode Altarpiece. Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art, 14(1), 2–43. 10.5092/jhna.2022.14.1.2
    https://doi.org/10.5092/jhna.2022.14.1.2 [Google Scholar]
40. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
    (2000) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp.109–132). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Díez Velasco, O. I.
    (2002) Patterns of conceptual interaction. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp.489–532). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219197.489
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.489 [Google Scholar]
42. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Díez Velasco, O. I.
    (2004) Metonymic motivation in anaphoric reference. InG. Radden & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp.293–320). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Mairal-Usón, R.
    (2007) High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. InG. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp.33–49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.136.05rui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.05rui [Google Scholar]
44. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Otal Campo, J. L.
    (2002) Metonymy, grammar, and communication. Albolote: Editorial Comares.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F., & Pérez Hernández, L.
    (2001) Metonymy and the grammar: motivation, constraints and interaction. Language and Communication, 21(4), 321–357. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(01)00008‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00008-8 [Google Scholar]
46. Schapiro, M.
    (1945) “Muscipula diaboli,” the symbolism of the Mérode Altarpiece. The Art Bulletin, 27(3), 182–187. 10.2307/3047011
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3047011 [Google Scholar]
47. Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovits, M. J.
    (1963) Cultural differences in the perception of geometric illusions. Science, 139(3556), 769–771. 10.1126/science.139.3556.769
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.139.3556.769 [Google Scholar]
48. Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovits, M. J.
    (1966) The influence of culture on visual perception. Oxford: Bobbs-Merrill.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Snyder, J.
    (2005) Northern renaissance art: Painting, sculpture, the graphic arts from 1350 to 1575 (2nd ed). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Turnbull, C.
    (1962) The forest people. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Wierzbicka, A.
    (2020) Addressing God in European languages: Different meanings, different cultural attitudes. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 24(2), 259–293. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑2020‑24‑2‑259‑293
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-259-293 [Google Scholar]
52. Wolff, M., Morceau, S., Folkard, R., Martin-Cortecero, J., & Groh, A.
    (2021) A thalamic bridge from sensory perception to cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 1201, 222–235. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.013 [Google Scholar]
53. Zakia, R. D., & Nadin, M.
    (1987) Semiotics, advertising and marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 4(2), 5–12. 10.1108/eb008192a
    https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008192a [Google Scholar]
54. Zakia, R., & Nadin, M.
    (1988) Visual aducation. InM. Herzfeld & L. Melazzo (Eds.), Semiotic theory and practice (volume 1+2) (pp.1237–1244). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]