1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Cognitive Linguistic Studies
  4. Volume 11, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Cognitive linguists have not paid much attention to the conceptual semantics of basic adjectives used predicatively about physical objects, concentrating mainly on attributive constructions (e.g., adjective ordering, interactions between adjective and noun) or on figurative uses. Among the exceptions are Anna Wierzbicka (2006) on ‘shape’ descriptors and Goddard & Wierzbicka (2007) on ‘physical quality’ descriptors, both conducted within the NSM framework of semantic-conceptual analysis. Building on this work, the present article proposes original semantic-conceptual explications for the basic physical meanings of ‘long’, ‘flat’, ‘round’, ‘hard’, ‘heavy’, and ‘sharp’. The project has high significance because it can be argued that these meanings function as conceptual building blocks in the semantics of innumerable other words and concepts in the realm of the physical. The article showcases cutting-edge work in NSM semantics, including introducing the notion of ‘visuospatial parsing’ into NSM research and emphasizing the importance of embodied experience in human conceptualization.

© 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00121.god
2024-10-10
2025-06-17

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00121.god
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boesch, C.
    (2012) Wild cultures: A comparison between chimpanzees and human cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139178532
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178532 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bromhead, H.
    (2011) Ethnogeographical categories in English and Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara. Language Sciences, 33(1), 58–75. 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.07.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2018) Landscape and culture: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.9
     https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.9 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brotherson, A.
    (2008) The ethnogeometry of Makasai (East Timor). InC. Goddard (Ed.), Cross-linguistic semantics (pp.259–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.102.17bro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.102.17bro [Google Scholar]
  5. Friedrich, P.
    (1970) Shape in grammar. Language, 46(2), 379–407. 10.2307/412285
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412285 [Google Scholar]
  6. Goddard, C.
    (Ed.) (2008) Cross-linguistic semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.102
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.102 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2010) Semantic molecules and semantic complexity: (with special reference to “environmental” molecules). Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), 123–155. 10.1075/rcl.8.1.05god
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.8.1.05god [Google Scholar]
  8. (2011) Semantic analysis: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. (2012) Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology. Linguistics, 50(3), 711–743. 10.1515/ling‑2012‑0022
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0022 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2015) Verb classes and valency alternations (NSM approach), with special reference to English physical activity verbs. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages: Volume 2: Case studies from Austronesia, the Pacific, the Americas, and theoretical outlook (pp.1671–1702). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110429343‑020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429343-020 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2016) Semantic molecules and their role in NSM lexical definitions. Cahiers de lexicologie, 1091, 13–34. 10.15122/isbn.978‑2‑406‑06861‑7.p.0013
     https://doi.org/10.15122/isbn.978-2-406-06861-7.p.0013 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2018) Ten lectures on Natural Semantic Metalanguage: Exploring language, thought and culture using simple, translatable words. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004357723
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004357723 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2021) Natural semantic metalanguage. InX. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.93–110). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351034708‑7
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-7 [Google Scholar]
  14. Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A.
    (Eds.) (2002a) Meaning and universal grammar. VolI1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.60
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.60 [Google Scholar]
  15. (Eds.) (2002b) Meaning and universal grammar. VolII1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.61
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.61 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2007) NSM analyses of the semantics of physical qualities: Sweet, hot, hard, heavy, rough, sharp in cross-linguistic perspective. Studies in Language, 31(4), 765–800. 10.1075/sl.31.4.03god
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.4.03god [Google Scholar]
  17. (2009) Contrastive semantics of physical activity verbs: ‘Cutting’ and ‘chopping’ in English, Polish, and Japanese. Language Sciences, 31(1), 60–96. 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2014) Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668434.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668434.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2015) What does Jukurrpa (‘Dreamtime’, ‘Dreaming’) mean? A semantic and conceptual journey of discovery. Australian Aboriginal Studies, (1), 43–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (2021a) Metalanguage update: Re-thinking “PARTS”. NSM-Con2021. Online conference, 16 April 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (2021b) ‘Head’, ‘eyes’, ‘ears’: Words and meanings as clues to common human thinking. Cahiers de lexicologie, (119), 125–150.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Goddard, C., Wierzbicka, A., & Fabréga Jr. H.
    (2014) Evolutionary semantics: Using NSM to model stages in human cognitive evolution. Language Sciences, 421, 60–79. 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.11.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goddard, C., Wierzbicka, A., & Farese, G. M.
    (2022) The conceptual semantics of “money” and “money words”. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 261, 7–30. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑27193
     https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-27193 [Google Scholar]
  24. Goddard, C., Wierzbicka, A., & Ye, Z.
    (2023) The natural semantic metalanguage (NSM) approach. InF. T. Li (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive semantics. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (1990) Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Locke, J.
    (1690) An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020 [Google Scholar]
  28. Peeters, B.
    (Ed.) (2006) Semantic primes and universal grammar: Empirical evidence from the Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.81
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.81 [Google Scholar]
  29. Wierzbicka, A.
    (2006) Shape in grammar revisited. Studies in Language, 30(1), 115–177. 10.1075/sl.30.1.05wie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.30.1.05wie [Google Scholar]
  30. (2007a) Shape and colour in language and thought. InA. C. Schalley & D. Khlentzos (Eds.), Mental states: Volume 2: Language and cognitive structure (pp.37–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.93.05wie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.93.05wie [Google Scholar]
  31. (2007b) Bodies and their parts: An NSM approach to semantic typology. Language Sciences, 29(1), 14–65. 10.1016/j.langsci.2006.07.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2006.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2021) Universal semantic primitives: Fifty years later. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 25(2), 317–342. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑2021‑25‑2‑317‑342
     https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-2-317-342 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ye, Z.
    (Ed.) (2017) The semantics of nouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198736721.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198736721.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00121.god
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conceptual semantics; NSM; physical descriptors; semantic molecule; semantic templates; visuospatial parsing

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error