1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Cognitive Linguistic Studies
  4. Volume 12, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Cognitive Linguistics has had an important mission in showing how conceptual formations — frames, idealized cognitive models, metaphorical mappings, etc. — play an essential role in our understanding of society, including political decisions. Most of that literature is focused on the way humans conceive and speak of society and politics, i.e., the conceptual aspect that was central to the mission of Cognitive Linguistics itself. This article goes beyond the linguistic and mental aspects, focusing on the role of conceptual models in social reality — in the way the world works. Causal relations are typically not in focus for cognitive or discourse-oriented studies — but they are essential in order to understand the role of conceptualization in the world: conceptualization works by feeding into the causal structure of the social world. A foundational point is the need for a multi-perspectival approach to social phenomena: The description of individual minds, the description of discourse processes, and the description of societies are not rivals competing for the same turf but necessary aspects of the same full story. Cognitive Linguistics shares concerns and issues with social constructionism, but differs in its emphasis on grounding, the importance of which is a key point in the discussion. More generally, an exclusive focus on mental phenomena may combine with idealist views of democracy and thereby create a risk of taking for granted a ‘let-there-be-light’ model of political change: To assume that once we agree on the idea, all that remains is to transform reality so as to conform to the ideal — which radically underestimates the difficulties both of getting there and making it work. The anthropological work of Arlie Russell Hochschild is used to illustrate how narratives, emotions, and hard social facts combine to create complex social reality.

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00136.har
2025-11-10
2025-12-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00136.har
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M.
    (2012) Blind retrospection: Why shark attacks are bad for democracy. Working Paper: 5–2013. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/csdi/research/CSDI_WP_05-2013.pdf
  2. (2016) Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400882731
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400882731 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, B.
    (2006) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (revised edition). London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bak, P.
    (1996) How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality. New York: Copernicus. 10.1007/978‑1‑4757‑5426‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5426-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
    (2000) Usage based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bornholdt, S., Jensen, M. H., & Sneppen, K.
    (2011) Emergence and decline of scientific paradigms. Physical Review Letters, 106(5), 058701. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.058701
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.058701 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourdieu, P.
    (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  9. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2005) Politicians and thetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230501706
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2011) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230319899
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chilton, P. A.
    (1996) Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chilton, P.
    (2004) Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  13. Clinton, H.
    (1969) Commencement speech: https://www.wellesley.edu/events/commencement/archives/1969commencement/studentspeech
  14. Crick, B.
    (1992) In defense of politics (4th edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Croft, W.
    (2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Eckert, P.
    (2000) Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Malden: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Flinders, M.
    (2010) In defence of politics. The Political Quarterly, 81(3), 309–326. 10.1111/j.1467‑923X.2010.02120.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2010.02120.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Foucault, M.
    (1966) Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines [The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences]. Paris: Gallimard.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. (1969) L’archéologie du savoir [The archaeology of knowledge]. Paris: Gallimard
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Translated byC. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, K. Soper. Brighton: The Harvester Press Limited.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (1982) The subject and power. InH. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp.185–204). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Frankfurt, H.
    (2005) On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400826537
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400826537 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gallie, W. B.
    (1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 561, 167–198. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544562
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gergen, K. J.
    (1996) Social psychology as social construction: The emerging vision. InC. McGarty & A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp.113–128). Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Giere, R. N.
    (2006) Scientific perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226292144.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226292144.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Goodhart, D.
    (2017) The road to somewhere: The populist revolt and the future of politics. London: Hurst.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Grice, P.
    (1967) Logic and conversation. InP. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Volume 3: Speech acts (pp.41–58). New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gumperz, J., & Cook-Gumperz, J.
    (1982) Interethnic communications in committee negotiations. InJ. J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp.145–162). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Habermas, J.
    (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen handelns [Theory of communicative action]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. (1986) Der einzige Patriotismus, der uns dem Westen nicht entfremdet, ist ein Verfassungspatriotismus. InJ. Habermas (Ed.), Eine Art Schadensabwicklung: Die apologetischen Tendenzen in der deutschen Zeitgeschichtsschreibung, Die ZeitNr. 29, 11. Juli 1986. S. 40.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. (1998) On the pragmatics of communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Harder, P.
    (1999) Partial autonomy. Ontology and methodology in cognitive linguistics. InT. Janssen & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology (pp.195–222). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110803464.195
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803464.195 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2010) Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110216059
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216059 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2013) Structure and function: A niche-constructional approach. InS. T. Bischoff & C. Jany (Eds.), Functional approaches to language (pp.71–106). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110285321.71
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110285321.71 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2023) Cognitive semantics: Conceptualization, identity (politics), and the real world. InF. T. Li (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive semantics (pp.360–394). Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. (fc). Norms and conflicts of word meaning. InD. Geeraerts & D. Glynn Eds. Cambridge handbook of lexical semantics.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Hart, C. & Lukeš, D.
    (2007) Cognitive linguistics in critical discourse analysis: Application and theory. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hochschild, A. R.
    (2016) Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: New Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. (2024) Stolen pride: Loss, shame, and the rise of the right. New York: New Press. 10.2307/jj.26193155
     https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.26193155 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hull, D. L.
    (1988) Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226360492.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226360492.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Jäger, A.
    (2023) Hyperpolitik: Extreme politisierung ohne politische folgen [Hyperpolitics: Extreme politicization without political consequences]. Frankfurt: Suhkamp.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kendi, I. X.
    (2019) How to be an antiracist. New York: One World.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kronenfeld, D. B.
    (2008) Culture, society, and cognition: Collective goals, values, action, and knowledge. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211481
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211481 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lakoff, G.
    (1996) Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. (2006) Whose freedom?: The battle over America’s most important idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. (2008) The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th-century brain. London: Viking Adult.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Levinson, S. C.
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  48. MacIntyre, A.
    (1988) Whose justice? Which rationality?. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H.
    (2008) Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Merleau-Ponty, M.
    (1962) Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Müller, J.-W.
    (2016) What is populism?. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 10.9783/9780812293784
     https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812293784 [Google Scholar]
  52. Musolff, A.
    (2008) The embodiment of Europe: How do metaphors evolve?. InR. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, Language and mind: Volume 2: Sociocultural situatedness (pp.301–326). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199116.3.301
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199116.3.301 [Google Scholar]
  53. Nerlich, B.
    (2010) ‘Climategate’: Paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis. Environmental values, 19(4), 419–442. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25764266
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Olson, M.
    (2011) The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups, second printing with a new preface and appendix. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Piketty, T.
    (2014) Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674369542
     https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2022) Mesurer le racisme, vaincre les discriminations [Measure racism and conquer discrimination]. Paris: Seuil.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Schein, E. H.
    (1985) Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Schudson, M.
    (1997) Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14(4), 297–309. 10.1080/15295039709367020
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039709367020 [Google Scholar]
  59. Searle, J. R.
    (1995) The construction of social reality. London: Penguin Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Simon, H. A.
    (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138. 10.1037/h0042769
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042769 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sinha, C.
    (1999) Grounding, mapping, and acts of meaning. InT. Janssen & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology (pp.223–255). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110803464.223
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803464.223 [Google Scholar]
  62. Smith, N.
    (2025) Overskudskvinder [Women in affluent positions]. København: Lindhardt & Ringhof.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Smith, S.
    (1997) Democracy, plurality, and education: Deliberating practices of and for civic participation. Philosophy of Education, 338–347. https://educationjournal.web.illinois.edu/archive/index.php/pes/article/view/2215.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Tomasello, M.
    (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. (2008) Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT press. 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  66. (2014) A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge: MIT press. 10.4159/9780674726369
     https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674726369 [Google Scholar]
  67. Verhagen, A.
    (2021) Ten lectures on cognitive evolutionary linguistics. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004422353
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004422353 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wenger, E.
    (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932 [Google Scholar]
  69. Winkielman, P., Coulson, S., & Niedenthal, P.
    (2018) Dynamic grounding of emotion concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 373(1752): 20170127. 10.1098/rstb.2017.0127
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0127 [Google Scholar]
  70. Wittgenstein, L.
    (1953) Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Zlatev, J.
    (1997) Situated embodiment: Studies in the emergence of spatial meaning. Stockholm: Gotab Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Zulaika, J., & Douglass, W.
    (1995) Terror and taboo: The follies, fables, and faces of terrorism. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00136.har
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): causal relations; collective vs. individual intentionality; emotion; facts and ideals; grounding; perspectivism and variation

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error