Metonymic thinking all the way down

References

1. Barcelona, A.
   (2000a) On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110894677.31
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.31 [Google Scholar]
2. Barcelona, A.
   (2000b) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barcelona, A.
   (2002) Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207–278). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.207
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.207 [Google Scholar]
4. Barcelona, A.
   (2005) The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic chains. InF. J. Ruiz de Mendoza & M. S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 313–352). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197716.4.313
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197716.4.313 [Google Scholar]
5. Barcelona, A.
   (2008a) Metonymy is not just a lexical phenomenon: On the operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse. InN.-L. Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected papers from the 2008 Stockholm Metaphor Festival (pp. 13–46). Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barcelona, A.
   (2008b) The interaction of metonymy and metaphor in the meaning and form of ‘bahuvrihi’ compounds. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 208–281. 10.1075/arcl.6.10bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.6.10bar [Google Scholar]
7. Barcelona, A.
   (2009) Motivation of construction meaning and form: The roles of metonymy and inference. InK.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 363–401). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.22bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.22bar [Google Scholar]
8. Barcelona, A.
   (2011) Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. InR. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 7–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.28.02bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.02bar [Google Scholar]
9. Barcelona, A.
   (2012) Metonymy in, under and above the lexicon. InS. M. Alegre, M. Moyel, E. Pladevall, & S. Tubau (Eds.), At a time of crisis: English and American studies in Spain: Works from the 35th AEDEAN Conference UAB/Barcelona 14–16 November 2011 (pp. 254–271). Barcelona: Departament de Filologia Anglesa i de Germanística, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/AEDEAN.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Barcelona, A.
    (2015) Metonymy. InE. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 143–167). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110292022‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022-008 [Google Scholar]
11. Barcelona, A.
    (2017) On the constructional status of interstate and highway names. International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 141. Tartu, Estonia.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Barcelona, A.
    (2024) Metonymy in grammar and discourse comprehension: Five case studies. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783111569604
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111569604 [Google Scholar]
13. Basilio, M.
    (2006) Metaphor and metonymy in word-formation. DELTA: Documentação de estudos em lingüística teórica e aplicada, 221, 67–80. 10.1590/S0102‑44502006000300006
    https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502006000300006 [Google Scholar]
14. Benczes, R.
    (2006) Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.19
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.19 [Google Scholar]
15. Blanco-Carrión, O., Barcelona, A., & Pannain, R.
    (2018) Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.60
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.60 [Google Scholar]
16. Brdar, M.
    (2017) Metonymy in word-formation: Their interactions and complementation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Brdar, M.
    (2018) Novel metonymies, wine and wineskins, old and new ones. InS. Gudurić & B. Radić-Bojanić (Eds.), Jezici i kulture u vremenu i prostoru VII/1 (pp. 123–134). Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet/Pedagoško društvo Vojvodine.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dirven, R.
    (1985) Metaphor as a basic means for extending the lexicon. InW. Paprotté & R. Dirven (Eds.), The ubiquity of metaphor: Metaphor in language and thought (pp. 85–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.29.06dir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.29.06dir [Google Scholar]
19. Dirven, R.
    (1999) Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata. InK.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 275–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.16dir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.16dir [Google Scholar]
20. Dirven, R., & Verspoor, M.
    (2004) Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clip.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.1 [Google Scholar]
21. Gutiérrez Rubio, E.
    (2021) Metonymy in Spanish word formation. InA. Fábregas, V. Acedo-Matellán, G. Armstrong, M. C. Cuervo & I. Pujol Payet (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Spanish morphology (pp. 399–415). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429318191‑31
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429318191-31 [Google Scholar]
22. Jackendoff, R., & Audring, J.
    (2020) The texture of the lexicon: Relational morphology and the parallel architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jakobson, R., & Halle, M.
    (2002) Fundamentals of language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110894264
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894264 [Google Scholar]
24. Janda, L. A.
    (2010) The role of metonymy in Czech word-formation. Slovo a slovesnost, 71(4), 260–273.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Janda, L. A.
    (2011) Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), 359–392. 10.1515/cogl.2011.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.014 [Google Scholar]
26. Johnson, M.
    (2007) The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
27. Koch, P.
    (2001) Metonymy: Unity in diversity. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 2(2), 201–244. 10.1075/jhp.2.2.03koc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.2.2.03koc [Google Scholar]
28. Kövecses, Z.
    (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195145113.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195145113.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
29. Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
    (1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78. 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
30. Kraska-Szlenk, I.
    (2019) Metonymic extensions of the body part ‘head’ in mental and social domains: The ‘head’. InI. Kraska-Szlenk (Ed.), Embodiment in cross-linguistic studies: The ‘Head’ (pp. 136–154). Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004392410_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392410_009 [Google Scholar]
31. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Leigh Foster, S.
    (1986) Reading dancing: Bodies and subjects in contemporary American dance. Berkeley: University of California Press
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lyons, J.
    (2005) Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mairal-Usón, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
    (2009) Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. InC. S. Butler & J. Martín Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing Constructions (pp. 153–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.107.08lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.107.08lev [Google Scholar]
35. Mittelberg, I.
    (2014) Gestures and iconicity. In: C. Müller, J. Bressem, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.). Body — Language — Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (38.2). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 1712–1732
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mittelberg, I.
    (2019) Visuo-kinetic signs are inherently metonymic: How embodied metonymy motivates forms, functions, and schematic patterns in gesture. Frontiers in Psychology, 101, Article254.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Müller, C.
    2004 Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family?InCornelia Müller & Roland Posner (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, 233–256. Berlin: Weidler
    [Google Scholar]
38. Pannain, R.
    (2017) Metonymy in numerals. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), 102–120. 10.1075/rcl.15.1.05pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.15.1.05pan [Google Scholar]
39. Panther, K.-U.
    (2022) Introduction to cognitive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clip.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.4 [Google Scholar]
40. Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
    (2001) A conceptual analysis of English -er nominals. InM. Pütz, S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy (pp. 149–200). 10.1515/9783110866254.149
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866254.149 [Google Scholar]
41. Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
    (2002) The roles of metaphor and metonymy in English -er nominals. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 279–322). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.279
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.279 [Google Scholar]
42. Paradis, C.
    (2015) Conceptual spaces at work in sensory cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances. InF. Zenker & P. Gärdenfors (Eds.), Applications of conceptual spaces: The case for geometric knowledge representation (pp. 33–55). Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑15021‑5_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15021-5_3 [Google Scholar]
43. Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M.
    (2013) Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 22–40. 10.1080/10926488.2013.742838
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.742838 [Google Scholar]
44. Radden, G.
    (2002) How metonymic are metaphors?. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 407–434) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.407
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.407 [Google Scholar]
45. Radden, G.
    (2003) How metonymie are metaphors?. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 93–108). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110894677.93
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.93 [Google Scholar]
46. Rakova, M.
    (2003) The extent of the literal: Metaphor, polysemy and theories of concepts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230512801
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512801 [Google Scholar]
47. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Luzondo Oyón, A.
    (2012) Lexical-constructional subsumption in resultative constructions in English. InM. Brdar, I. Raffaelli & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics between universality and variation (pp. 117–136). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sadamitsu, M.
    (1999) Synaesthesia: A study from a cognitive viewpoint. Conference book of the English linguistic society of Japan, 1711, 121–124.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Sadamitsu, M.
    (2002) A cognitive account of synaesthetic metaphor. Osaka University Papers in English Linguistics, 61, 115–130.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sadamitsu, M.
    (2004) Synaesthesia re-examined: An alternative treatment of smell related concepts. Osaka University Papers in English Linguistics, 81, 109–125.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Strik Lievers, F.
    (2017) Figures and senses: Towards a definition of synaesthesia. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), 83–101. 10.1075/rcl.15.1.04str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.15.1.04str [Google Scholar]
52. Strik Lievers, F.
    (2018) Synaesthesia and other figures: What the senses tell us about figurative language. InA. Baicchi, R. Digonnet & J. L. Sandford (Eds.), Sensory perceptions in language, embodiment and epistemology (pp. 193–207). Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑91277‑6_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91277-6_11 [Google Scholar]
53. Taylor, J. R.
    (1995) Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Taylor, J. R.
    (2003) Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory (3rd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199266647.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199266647.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
55. Ullmann, S.
    (1951) The principles of semantics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Vogt, S.
    (2013) Die analyse ‘synästhetischer’ metapher mittels frames. Metaphorik.de, 231, 19–48.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Wilcox, S., Wilcox, P. P., & Jarque, M. J.
    (2003) Mappings in conceptual space: Metonymy, metaphor, and iconicity in two signed languages. Jezikoslovlje, 4(1), 139–156.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Winter, B.
    (2019) Synaesthetic metaphors are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical. InL. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp. 105–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.19.06win
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.06win [Google Scholar]
59. Yu, N.
    (2003) Synesthetic metaphor: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32(1), 19–34. 10.1515/jlse.2003.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.2003.001 [Google Scholar]
60. Zhao, Q., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C.-R.
    (2022) Linguistic synesthesia is metaphorical: A lexical-conceptual account. Cognitive Linguistics, 33(3), 553–583. 10.1515/cog‑2021‑0098
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0098 [Google Scholar]
61. Zwitserlood, I.
    (2012) Classifiers. InR. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 158–186). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.158
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.158 [Google Scholar]