1887
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper aims at illustrating the role of conceptual metonymy and conceptual metaphor in the meaning construal of the philosopher Alan Watts’s “The Beauty of Nothingness” by the Portuguese choreographer and dancer Tiago Coelho. As Irene Mittelberg (2019: 10) claims: “Generally speaking, there are innumerable latent contiguity relations out there in the world, in our imagination, and in our embodied knowledge structures that may be operationalized when we are reasoning and communicating.” In line with this perspective, the research presented here will focus on the contiguity relations between the dancer’s internal world and his communication of the world described by Watts. I fully endorse Mark Johnson’s (2007) claim that aesthetics lies at our very capacity to make meaning and that art is simply an exemplary manifestation of this ability. As he points out, humans are sentient beings, explorers of space, other entities, their inner life. In line with these ideas, the present analysis of the contemporary dance choreography is an attempt at approaching the choreographer’s exemplary manifestation of meaning making as well as describing the underlying resources, which he as a human being has and puts at the service of his own construal as well as the construal that reaches the audience via his body.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00147.car
2026-04-17
2026-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barcelona, A.
    (2000b) On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110894677.31
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.31 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2002) Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207–278). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.207
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.207 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2011) Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. InRéka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.) Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a consensus view. John Benjamins. Amsterdam/Philadelphia (pp.7–57) 10.1075/hcp.28.02bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.02bar [Google Scholar]
  4. (2018) General description of the metonymy database in the Córdoba project, with particular attention to the issues of hierarchy, prototypicality, and taxonomic domains. InO. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (pp. 27–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.60.01bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.60.01bar [Google Scholar]
  5. (2024) Metonymy in grammar and discourse comprehension: Five case studies. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783111569604
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111569604 [Google Scholar]
  6. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1977) The Case for Case Reopened. In Syntax and Semantics (Vol.81). Grammatical Relations. Academic Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1982) Frame semantics. InThe Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gallese, V.
    (2019) Embodied simulation. Its bearing on aesthetic experience and the dialogue between neuroscience and the humanities. Gestalt Theory, 41(2), 113–127. 10.2478/gth‑2019‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2019-0013 [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson, M.
    (2007) The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp.202–251). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  12. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Langacker, R. W.
    (1999) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110800524
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  14. Leigh Foster, S.
    (1986) Reading dancing: Bodies and subjects in contemporary American dance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mittelberg, I.
    (2014) Gestures and iconicity. In: C. Müller, J. Bressem, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.). Body — Language — Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (38.21). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 1712–1732
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2019) Visuo-kinetic signs are inherently metonymic: How embodied metonymy motivates forms, functions, and schematic patterns in gesture. Frontiers in Psychology, 101, Article 254. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00254
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00254 [Google Scholar]
  17. Müller, C.
    2004 Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family?InCornelia Müller & Roland Posner (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, 233–256. Berlin: Weidler
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2018) Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations?. Frontiers in Psychology, 91, Article 1651. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651 [Google Scholar]
  19. Talmy, L.
    (2018) The targeting system of language. Cambridge: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262036979.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262036979.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00147.car
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00147.car
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error