1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates how wine pics construct visual winespeak through investigating the metaphor and metonymy in the Japanese manga, . The study demonstrated that metonymy has the indicational function to help others understand the winespeak quicker and can be elaborated as a visual metaphor as suggested in previous studies (Isabel Negro Alousque 2015Zahra Kashanizadeh & Charles Forceville 2020). Two metonymies related to winespeak include the smell and mouthfeel of the wine. Four common source domains of metaphor in visual winespeak, , and have been identified. The study further utilized the Visual Narrative Grammar (VNG) proposed by Neil Cohn (2013a2013b20152020) to examine the roles of metaphor and metonymy in visual winespeak. Visual winespeak can be deconstructed as establisher, initial, prolongation, peak, and release. Findings suggest that the VNG corresponds with the procedure of wine tasting, which involves attack, evolution, and aftertaste (Rosario Caballero, Ernesto Suárez-Toste & Carita Paradis 2019; Adrienne Lehrer 2009). Also, results show that it is possible to predict the positions of metonymy and metaphor in a narrative of visual winespeak. Metonymy usually occurs in the establisher, and metaphor tends to be presented in the peak. Their positions in a narrative further indicate their function. The usage of metonymy aims to set up a concrete and general setting, and metaphor is used to create a climax. In general, the findings show that, although metaphor and metonymy play different roles in a narrative, they co-construct a comprehensive and detailed visual narrative to elaborate a winespeak.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.21009.hsu
2023-10-05
2024-09-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alousque, I. N.
    (2015) Visual wine metaphor and metonymy in ads. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1731, 125–131. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.041
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.041 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bratož, S.
    (2013) The anthropomorphic metaphor in Slovene and English wine tasting discourses. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 10(1), 23–35. 10.4312/elope.10.1.23‑35
    https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.10.1.23-35 [Google Scholar]
  3. Caballero, R.
    (2007) Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2095–2114. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2009) Cutting across the senses: Imagery in winespeak and audiovisual promotion. InC. J. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 73–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366.2.73
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.2.73 [Google Scholar]
  5. Caballero, R., & Suárez-Toste, E.
    (2008) Translating the senses: Teaching the metaphors in winespeak. InF. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 241–260). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199161.3.241
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199161.3.241 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2010) A genre approach to imagery in winespeak: Issues and prospects. InG. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 265–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.26.15cab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.15cab [Google Scholar]
  7. Caballero, R., Suárez-Toste, E., & Paradis, C.
    (2019) Representing wine: sensory perceptions, communication and cultures (Vol.211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.21
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.21 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohn, N.
    (2013a) The visual language of comics: Introduction to the structure and cognition of sequential images. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781472542175
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472542175 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2013b) Visual narrative structure. Cognitive science, 37(3), 413–452. 10.1111/cogs.12016
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12016 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2015) How to analyze visual narratives: A tutorial in Visual Narrative Grammar. Online: www.visuallanguagelab.com/P/VNG_Tutorial.pdf [last accessed: 1 March 2016]. CitetononCRdoi:10.13140/RG.2.1.2736.3286
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2736.3286
  11. (2020) Who understands comics?: Questioning the universality of visual language comprehension. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350156074
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350156074 [Google Scholar]
  12. Creed, A.
    (2013) Wine and metaphor: Cross-cultural [dis]harmony. InW. Midgley, K. Trimmer & A. Davies (Eds.), Metaphors for, in and of education research (pp. 10–25). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2016) Wine communication in a global market: A study of metaphor through the genre of Australian wine reviews. PhD dissertation. Australia: University of Southern Queensland.
  14. Ehrlichman, H., & Halpern, J. N.
    (1988) Affect and memory -- Effects of pleasant and unpleasant odors on retrieval of happy and unhappy memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 769–779. 10.1037/0022‑3514.55.5.769
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.769 [Google Scholar]
  15. Forceville, C.
    (2009) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366.1.19
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.1.19 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibbs, J.
    (1999) Speaking and thinking with metonymy. InK.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 61–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.04gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.04gib [Google Scholar]
  17. Gluck, M.
    (2003) Wine language. Useful idiom or idiot-speak. New media language, 107–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Herz, R. S., & Engen, T.
    (1996) Odor memory: Review and analysis. Psychon Bull Rev, 3(3), 300–313. 10.3758/BF03210754
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210754 [Google Scholar]
  19. Herz, R. S., & Schooler, J. W.
    (2002) A naturalistic study of autobiographical memories evoked by olfactory and visual cues: testing the Proustian hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology, 115(1), 21–32. 10.2307/1423672
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1423672 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hsu, I., & Chiang, W.-Y.
    (2021) ‘Seeing’ music from manga: Visualizing music with embodied mechanisms of musical experience. Visual Communication, 21(4), 624–644. 10.1177/1470357220974707
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357220974707 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kövecses, Z.
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2019) New extensions of conceptual metaphor theory: How they apply to visual metaphors. InA. Benedek & K. Nyíri (Eds.), Image and metaphor in the new century (pp. 3–16). Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
    (1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics (includes Cognitive Linguistic Bibliography), 9(1), 37–78. 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kashanizadeh, Z., & Forceville, C.
    (2020) Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy: A study of Iranian and Dutch print advertisements. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 7(1), 78–110. 10.1075/cogls.00050.kas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00050.kas [Google Scholar]
  25. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lehrer, A.
    (2007) Can wines be brawny? Reflections on wine vocabulary. InB. C. Smith (Ed.), Questions of taste: The philosophy of wine. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2009) Wine and conversation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307931.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307931.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Majid, A., & Burenhult, N.
    (2014) Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130(2), 266–270. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  29. Normand-Marconnet, N., & Jones, J. C.
    (2020) Anthropomorphic metaphors in wine discourse, with special reference to Japanese wine manga. International Journal of Language and Culture, 7(2), 274–301. 10.1075/ijolc.17009.nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.17009.nor [Google Scholar]
  30. Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M.
    (2013) Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 22–40. 10.1080/10926488.2013.742838
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.742838 [Google Scholar]
  31. Rubin, D. C., Groth, E., & Goldsmith, D. J.
    (1984) Olfactory cuing of autobiographical memory. The American journal of psychology, 97(4), 493–507. 10.2307/1422158
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1422158 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Díez Velasco, O. I.
    (2002) Patterns of conceptual interaction. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219197.489
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.489 [Google Scholar]
  33. Smith, B. C.
    (2007) The objectivity of tastes and tasting. InB. C. Smith (Ed.), Questions of taste: The philosophy of wine (pp. 41–77). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Suárez-Toste, E.
    (2007) Metaphor inside the wine cellar: On the ubiquity of personification schemas in winespeak. Metaphorik. de, 12(1), 53–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2017) Babel of the senses: On the roles of metaphor and synesthesia in wine reviews. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication, 23(1), 89–112. 10.1075/term.23.1.04sua
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.23.1.04sua [Google Scholar]
  36. Sweetser, E.
    (1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure (Vol.541). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  37. Winter, B.
    (2016) Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(8), 975–988. 10.1080/23273798.2016.1193619
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1193619 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2019) Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor (Vol.201): Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.20.c18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.20.c18 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.21009.hsu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.21009.hsu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Drops of God; manga; metaphor; metonymy; visual narrative grammar; visual winespeak
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error