1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Cognitive Linguistic Studies
  4. Volume 9, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The Chinese Passive Construction with Retained Object (CPCRO) has aroused extensive attention from scholars especially advocators of Generative Grammar due to its syntactic idiosyncrasy. Previous researches primarily concerned with such syntactic idiosyncrasy concentrate on issues of its syntactic derivation but fail to provide an empirically responsible and consensual explanation for all its instantiations. This paper initiates a new perspective by focusing on its semantics on the basis of Construction Grammar. It is argued that CPCRO is a construction with its constructional meaning characterized by a causative meaning that profiles the causee’s change. This passive causative meaning is elaborated by three verb-class-specific semantic variants, i.e., the variant associated with motion verbs or verbs entailing motion and specifying the causee’s change of location, the variant associated with verbs of making or creating and specifying the causee’s change of state, and the variant associated with ditransitive verbs or verbs with the potential of taking double objects and specifying the causee’s change of possession. They are structured into a polysemy network in the sense that the variant is metaphorically extended from the variant, whereas the variant encoding the object-dual-based conceptualization of Event Structure directly relates to the variant which encodes the location-dual-based conceptualization, and indirectly to the variant which preserves the location-dual-based conceptualization due to the invariance principle of metaphorical mapping, through profile shift.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.21012.jia
2022-05-30
2025-02-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/cogls.21012.jia
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baron, I., & Herslund, M.
    (2001) Semantics of the verb HAVE. InI. Baron, M. Herslund & F. Sørensen (Eds.), Dimensions of possession (pp.85–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.47.06bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.47.06bar [Google Scholar]
  2. Bi, L.
    (2020) Hanyu daibin beidongju xianxiang yu daibin beidongju yanjiu [The study of passives with retained objects in Mandarin]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning], (1), 57–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Cao, X.
    (1999) Lun Heng beidong jushi yanjiu [The study of passive constructions in Lun Heng]. Guhanyu Yanjiu [Research in Ancient Chinese Language], (2), 79–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cappelle, B.
    (2006) Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions, (Special Volume1), 1–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Croft, W.
    (2003) Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. InH. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language (pp.49–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.243.07cro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.243.07cro [Google Scholar]
  6. Freeze, R.
    (2001) Existential constructions. InM. Haspelmath (Ed.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (pp.941–953). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Geeraerts, D.
    (2010) Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N.
    (2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, (3), 289–316. 10.1515/cogl.2004.011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.011 [Google Scholar]
  11. Han, J., & Pan, H.
    (2016) Hanyu baoliu binyu jiegou jufa shengcheng de zuijian fenxi [A minimalist account of the syntactic derivation of Chinese retained object constructions]. Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], (3), 41–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Hu, W.
    (2005) Yetan Baziju de yufa yiyi [Revisiting the grammatical meaning of the Ba-construction]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Studies in Language and Linguistics], (2), 21–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Jackendoff, R.
    (1983) Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Lakoff, G.
    (1990) The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?Cognitive Linguistics, (1), 39–74. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39 [Google Scholar]
  15. (1993a) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edn.) (pp.202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1993b) The metaphor system and its role in grammar. InU. Eco, M. Santambrogio & P. Violi (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on the correspondence of conceptual, semantic and grammatical representations (pp.217–241). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. (1994) What is a conceptual system?InW. F. Overton & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), The nature and ontogenesis of meaning (pp.41–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar (I): Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, L.
    (1980) Beiziju [Bei-sentences]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], (6), 401–412.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (1988) Hanyu bijiao bianhuan yufa [Comparative and transformational grammar in Chinese]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (2011/1986) Xiandai hanyu juxing [Sentence patterns in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin, D., & Xie, C.
    (2003) Hudong yuyanxue de fazhan licheng jiqi qianjing [Interactional linguistics: Developments and prospects]. Xiandai Waiyu [Modern Foreign Languages], (4), 411–418.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu, P.
    (2009) Xiandai hanyu Baziju de duojiaodu tanjiu [Multi-dimensional studies on Ba-construction in Modern Chinese]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lü, S.
    (1999) Hanyu yufa lunwenji [A collection on Chinese grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press. (Originally published in 1965 with the title “Beiziju, Baziju dongci dai binyu [Bei-construction and Ba-construction with objects after the verb]” inZhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], (4).)
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lü, W.
    (1990) Beiziju zhong de jizu yuyi guanxi [Several semantic relations within the Bei-construction]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese Teaching in the World], (2), 91–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Ma, Z.
    (2013) Jiyu xiayi lingshu guanxi lun lingzhuju, baoliu binyu beidongju yu qiangduolei shuangbinju de guanlianxing [On the interrelations among three types of constructions with affected arguments in Chinese (UCPP, PCRO and DOCM): From a perspective of possessor-possessee relationship in the narrow sense]. Huawen Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu [TCSOL Studies], (3), 66–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Ma, Z., & Tian, Q.
    (2015) Hanyu youbin chang Beiziju de shengcheng jizhi yanjiu [A study on the generative mechanism of Chinese Bei sentences with subjects and objects: On the distinction and complementarity between different linguistic theories]. Jiefangjun Waiguoyu Xueyuan Xuebao [Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages], (2), 8–15, 31.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Norvig, P., & Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Taking: A study in lexical network theory. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, (13), 195–206. 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1820
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1820 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pan, H., & Han, J.
    (2008) Hanyu baoliu binyu jiegou de jufa shengcheng jizhi [The syntactic mechanism of retained object constructions in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], (6), 511–522.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Perek, F.
    (2015) Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.17
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.17 [Google Scholar]
  32. Shen, J.
    (2002) Ruhe chuzhi chuzhishi: Shilun Baziju de zhuguanxing [Can the disposal construction be disposed of: On the subjectivity of Ba-construction in Mandarin Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], (5), 387–399.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (2010) Yinghan foudingci de fenhe he mingdong de fenhe [Division of negatives and noun/verb division in English and Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], (5), 387–399.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Shi, C.
    (2006) Baziju de paisheng guocheng jiqi xiangguan wenti [The derived process of Ba-construction and its relevant problems]. Yufa Yanjiu He Tanshuo [Explorations in Grammar], 13, 49–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. (2010) Cong jushiqun kan Baziju ji xiangguan jushi de yufa yiyi [A study of the grammatical meanings of the Ba-construction and other relevant constructions from the perspective of construction group]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese Teaching in the World], (3), 291–309.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. (2015) Bianyuan Baziju de yuyi lijie he jufa gouzao [Semantics and syntax of peripheral Ba-constructions]. Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], (6), 53–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Shi, Y.
    (2020) Bidirectional transfers of the ditransitive construction in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, (2), 416–439. 10.1075/cogls.00063.shi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00063.shi [Google Scholar]
  38. Shibatani, M.
    (1988) Passive and voice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.16
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.16 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sørensen, F.
    (2001) Possession spaces in Danish. InI. Baron, M. Herslund & F. Sørensen (Eds.), Dimensions of possession (pp.57–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.47.04sor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.47.04sor [Google Scholar]
  40. Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T.
    (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (2), 209–243. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  41. Tang, S.-W.
    (2004) Zuogehua he hanyu beidongju [Ergativization and Chinese passives]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], (4), 291–301.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, H.
    (1957) Baziju he Beiziju [Ba-construction and Bei-construction]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. (2003) Baziju de yiyi jiujing shi shenme [What is the meaning of Ba-construction]. Yuwen Yanjiu [Linguistic Research], (2), 35–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, J., & Zhou, B.
    (2016) Dai baoliu binyu de beidongju yu qiangtoulei shuangbinju de shenceng jufa lianxi [The syntactic relations between Chinese passive construction with a retained object and double object construction]. Xiandai Waiyu [Modern Foreign Languages], (1), 31–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, L.
    (1943) Zhongguo xiandai yufa [Chinese modern grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Wen, X.
    (2014) Yuyan de renzhi jichu [Cognitive Foundations of Language]. Beijing: Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Wen, X., & Jiang, C.
    (2019) Jiyu cengjiguan he hudongguan de hanyu dongjie goushi jufa yuyi jiemian fenxi [Hierarchical and interactional approach to syntax-semantics interface of Chinese resultative construction]. Waiyu Jiaoxue [Foreign Language Education], (4), 28–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Wen, X., Yang, K., & Kuang, F.
    (2014) Cognitive Linguistics: Retrospect and prospect. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, (2), 155–170. 10.1075/cogls.1.2.01wen
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.1.2.01wen [Google Scholar]
  49. Xiong, Z.
    (2015) Hanyu fei lingshuxing baoliu binyuju de jufa fenxi [A syntactic analysis of the non-possessive retained object construction]. Huawen Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu [TCSOL Studies], (1), 57–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu, J.
    (1999) Liangzhong baoliu binyu jushi ji xiangguan jufa lilun wenti [Some theoretical issues of the two types of Chinese ‘retained-object’ constructions]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics], (1), 16–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Xue, F.
    (1987) Shilun Baziju de yuyi tezheng [On semantic features of Ba-constructions]. Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], (1), 4–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Yu, Y.
    (2019) Zailun shuangbinyuju de goushi yuyi [Re-discussion on the constructional meaning of double object sentence]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning], (3), 56–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Yuan, B.
    (1989) Zu Tang Ji beidongju yanjiu [A study on passive sentences in Zu Tang Ji]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], (1), 53–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Yue, H., & Wu, H.
    (2019) Baoliu binyu beidongju yunzhun de lingshu guanxi leixing ji renzhi fenxi [Types of possessive relationship and cognitive analysis on the licensing of PRCO]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese Teaching in the World], (1), 58–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang, B.
    (1999) Xiandai hanyu de shuangjiwu jiegoushi [Ditransitive construction in Modern Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], (3), 175–184.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang, G.
    (2001) Zhiyue duoshi chengfen juwei shixian de yuyi yinsu [The semantic constraints on the syntactic mapping of the “deprived” constituent]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], (6), 508–518.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.21012.jia
Loading
Semantics of the Chinese passive construction with retained object
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 9, 64 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.21012.jia
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.21012.jia
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.21012.jia
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese Passive Construction with Retained Object; Construction Grammar; metaphorical extension; polysemy; profile shift

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error