1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Set in the contemporary public discourse about the Serbian language, this paper demonstrates how metaphors of and about constructed with the source domains of and (e.g., language occupation, language as battlefield, to fight for language) may serve nationalistic political aims and act as conflict-inciting messages, under the pretenses of typical language purism or ‘language care’. The concept of pseudometaphor is introduced as a figuration-based discursive strategy whereby metaphors for , underpinned by the metonymy, may serve as tools for covertly conveying controversial messages about their respective . The analysis covers public discourse published in a span of eight years (2010–2018), involving institutionalized language and political campaigns, and less institutionalized public language debates. As convergent evidence for pseudo-metaphoricity of the metaphors and their potential for instigating inter-ethnic conflict, the analysis includes critical voices that expose the dominant ideology through literalization of their metaphorical models.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.22003.cic
2023-10-05
2024-07-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, B.
    (2006) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (revised edition). London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arbib, M. A., & Hesse, M. B.
    (1986) The construction of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511527234
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527234 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bermel, N.
    (2007) Linguistic authority, language ideology, and metaphor: The Czech orthography wars. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197662
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197662 [Google Scholar]
  4. Berthele, R.
    (2008) A nation is a territory with one culture and one language: The role of metaphorical folk models in language policy debates. InG. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 301–331). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199154.3.301
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199154.3.301 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bogetić, K. D.
    (2018) Metaphors of English and Serbian language in British and Serbian newspaper discourse. Ph.D. dissertation. Belgrade: University of Belgrade. Retrieved fromhttps://uvidok.rcub.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/handle/123456789/2749/Doktorat.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  6. Cameron, L.
    (2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London/New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2007) Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2), 197–222. 10.1177/0957926507073376
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073376 [Google Scholar]
  8. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan London. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  9. Čičin-Šain, V.
    (2019) Metaphors for language contact and change: Croatian language and national identity. InL. Šarić & M. Stanojević (Eds.), Metaphor, nation, discourse (pp. 127–154). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.82.06cic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.82.06cic [Google Scholar]
  10. Čolović, I.
    (2008) Balkan – teror kulture: Ogledi o političkoj antropologiji, 21 [The balkans – The terror of culture: Essays on political anthropology, 2]. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Đurović, T., & Silaški, N.
    (2019) Barbed wire around Serbia: Migrant metaphors as a means of constructing national identity. InL. Šarić & M. Stanojević (Eds.), Metaphor, nation and discours (pp. 59–74). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.82.03dur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.82.03dur [Google Scholar]
  12. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
    (2003) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Felberg, T. R., & Šarić, L.
    (2013) Discursive construction of language identity through disputes in croatian and montenegrin media. Scando-Slavica, 59(1),7–31. 10.1080/00806765.2012.740255
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00806765.2012.740255 [Google Scholar]
  14. Geeraerts, D.
    (2003) Cultural models of linguistic standardization. InR. Dirven, R. Frank & M. Pütz (Eds.), Cognitive models in language and thought: Ideology, metaphors and meanings (pp. 25–68). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110892901.25
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892901.25 [Google Scholar]
  15. Greenberg, R. D.
    (2008) Language and identity in the balkans: Serbo-Croatian and its disintegration. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208753.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208753.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ilić, M.
    (2014) Collective narrative: The narrative on Croatian language from academic to far-right discourses in Serbia. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology5(1), 49–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. IN4S
    IN4S (2013) Odricanje od srpskog jezika i ćirilice za Srbe znači odricanje od samih sebe [Giving up on the Serbian language and Cyrillic Script for Serbs means giving up on themselves]. IN4S. Retrieved fromhttps://www.in4s.net/kovacevic-odricanje-od-srpskog-jezika-cirilice-za-srbe-znaci-odricanje-od-samih-sebe/?lang=lat
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Joseph, J. E.
    (2004) Language and identity: National, ethnic, religious. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire/New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230503427
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503427 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jovanović, J. R.
    (2015) Da dakanje ne pređe u naviku [Against making constructions with ‘da’ habitual]. Politika. Retrieved fromwww.politika.rs/sr/clanak/338447/Da-dakanje-ne-prede-u-naviku
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KhosraviNik, M.
    (2009) The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005). Discourse & Society, 20(4), 477–498. 10.1177/0957926509104024
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509104024 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kordić, S.
    (2010) Jezik i nacionalizam [Language and nationalism]. Zagreb: Durieux.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kӧvecses, Z.
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (2003) Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Langston, K., & Peti-Stantić, A.
    (2014) Language planning and national identity in Croatia. London: Palgrave Macmillan London. 10.1057/9781137390608
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137390608 [Google Scholar]
  25. Marković, T.
    (2016) GOVORITE LI APSURDISTANSKI: Odbrana i poslednji dani ćirilice [DO YOU SPEAK ABSURDISTAN: Defense and the Last Days of Cyrillic]. Žurnal. Retrieved fromwww.zurnal.info/novost/20124/odbrana-i-poslednji-dani-cirilice
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mičić Kandijaš, S.
    (2015) Agensi nisu agenti [Chemical agents are not secret agents]. Politika. Retrieved fromwww.politika.co.rs/sr/clanak/337878/Kultura/Agensi-nisu-agenti
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Milinković, D.
    (2017) Tri stuba za opstanak svih Srba [Three pillars for the survival of all Serbs]. Novosti. Retrieved fromhttps://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/politika/aktuelno.289.html:679819-Tri-stuba-za-opstanak-svih-Srba
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Musolff, A.
    (2016) Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Polzenhagen, F., & Dirven, R.
    (2008) Rationalist or romantic model in globalisation?. InG. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 237–300). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199154.3.237
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199154.3.237 [Google Scholar]
  30. Radisavljević, Z.
    (2012) Neizdrživo nasilje nad jezičkom kulturom [Unbearable violence against Language culture]. Politika. Retrieved fromwww.politika.rs/sr/clanak/242504/Tema-nedelje/Kako-ne-cuvamo-srpski-jezik/Neizdrzivo-nasilje-nad-jezickom-kulturom
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2015a) Srpski jezik se umnožava deljenjem [The Serbian language is multiplied by division]. Politika. Retrieved fromwww.politika.rs/sr/clanak/325567/Kultura/Srpski-jezik-se-umnozava-deljenjem
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Radovanović, Z.
    (2015b) Tuđice nisu otmene reči [Foreign words are not posh]. Politika. Retrieved fromwww.politika.rs/scc/clanak/337453/Tudice-nisu-otmene-reci
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Reddy, M. J.
    (1993) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 164–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.012 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ricoeur, P.
    (1978) The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and feeling. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 143–159. 10.1086/447977
    https://doi.org/10.1086/447977 [Google Scholar]
  35. Saldaña, J.
    (2013) The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed). Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Seargeant, P.
    (2009) Metaphors of possession in the conceptualisation of language. Language & Communication, 29(4), 383–393. 10.1016/j.langcom.2009.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sretenović, M.
    (2018) Jurišanje na srpski jezik [Assault on the Serbian language], Politika. Retrieved fromwww.politika.rs/sr/clanak/398781/Jurisanje-na-srpski-jezik
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Šarić, L.
    (2014) Metafora, diskurs i društvo [Metaphor, discourse, and society]. InM. Stanojević (Ed.), Metafore koje istražujemo: Suvremeni uvidi u konceptualnu metaforu [Investigating metaphors: Current insights into conceptual metaphor] (pp. 169–202). Zagreb: Srednja Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tanjug
    Tanjug (2016) Konferencija “Jezici i nacionalizam” održana u Beogradu [The “Languages and Nationalism” conference held in Belgrade]. b92. Retrieved fromhttps://www.b92.net/kultura/vesti.php?nav_category=272&yyyy=2016&mm=10&dd=05&nav_id=1184563
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Tanjug
    Tanjug (2018) Predlog za razmišljanje o jeziku i nama [A suggestion for reflection about the language and us]. Politika. Retrieved fromwww.politika.rs/sr/clanak/397198/Predlog-za-razmisljanje-o-jeziku-i-nama
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Underhill, J. W.
    (2013) Creating worldviews: Metaphor, ideology, and language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Van der Horst, J.
    (2008) Het einde van de standardtaal. Een wisseling van Europese taalcultuur [The end of the standard language: A change of European language culture]. Amsterdam: J.M. Meulenhoff 2008 Translated to Croatian byRadovan Lučić (2016) asPropast standardnoga jezika [The collapse of the standard language]. Zagreb: Srednja Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Vervaet, S.
    (2019) “Let’s work on our Serbian!”: Standard language ideology, metaphors and discourses about Serbian national identity in the newspaper Politika in 2015. InL. Šarić & M. Stanojević (Eds.), Metaphor, Nation, Discourse (pp. 101–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.82.05ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.82.05ver [Google Scholar]
  44. Vijesti.ba
    Vijesti.ba (2018) Nestala pompezno najavljivana Deklaracija o opstanku srpskog naroda [The pompously announced declaration on the survival of the Serbian nation disappeared], Vijesti.ba. Retrieved fromwww.infomediabalkan.com/nestala-deklaracija-o-opstanku-srpskog-naroda
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Vukosavljević, V.
    (2017) Definisati kulturno jezgro i prostor [To define the cultural core and space]. Politika. Retrieved fromwww.politika.rs/sr/clanak/379004/Definisati-kulturno-jezgro-i-prostor
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Watts, R. J.
    (2011) Language myths and the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327601.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327601.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Živančević, N.
    (2018) Negujmo srpski, poštujmo francuski [Let’s respect French, but take care of Serbian]. Politika. Retrieved fromwww.politika.rs/sr/clanak/412493/Negujmo-srpski-postujmo-francuski
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.22003.cic
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.22003.cic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): (pseudo-)metaphor; language ideology; Serbian; VIOLENCE/WAR figurations
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error