Can frame-semantic congruence enhance incidental memory for food labels?

References

1. Ackermann, L. K.
   (2023) Bagger or bär? The influence of individual interests on early word learning. Doctoral dissertation. Gottingen: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. https://ediss.uni-goettingen.de/handle/11858/14438
2. Alejandro, R. J., Packard, P. A., Steiger, T. K., Fuentemilla, L., & Bunzeck, N.
   (2021) Semantic congruence drives long-term memory and similarly affects neural retrieval dynamics in young and older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 131, Article 683908. 10.3389/fnagi.2021.683908
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.683908 [Google Scholar]
3. Alkasasbeh, A. A., Spyridonis, F., & Ghinea, G.
   (2021) When scents help me remember my password. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 18(3), Article 16. 10.1145/3469889
   https://doi.org/10.1145/3469889 [Google Scholar]
4. Allen, M.
   (2016) The influence of phonetic symbolism on memory for advertisements. Master’s thesis. Cambridge: Harvard College. https://scholarship.tricolib.brynmawr.edu/handle/10066/18748
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barton, J. J. S., Hanif, H. M., Björnström, L. E., & Hills, C.
   (2014) The word-length effect in reading: A review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(5–6), 378–412. 10.1080/02643294.2014.895314
   https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.895314 [Google Scholar]
6. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
   (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
7. Bian, L., & Markman, E. M.
   (2020) Why do we eat cereal but not lamb chops at breakfast? Investigating Americans’ beliefs about breakfast foods. Appetite, 1441, Article 104458. 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104458
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104458 [Google Scholar]
8. Boas, H. C., Dux, R., & Ziem, A.
   (2016) Frames and constructions in an online learner’s dictionary of German. InS. De Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied construction grammar (pp.303–326). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110458268‑012
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268-012 [Google Scholar]
9. Bodoh-Creed, A. L.
   (2020) Mood, memory, and the evaluation of asset prices. Review of Finance, 24(1), 227–262. 10.1093/rof/rfz001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfz001 [Google Scholar]
10. Boltz, M. G., Mangigian, G. M., & Allen, M. B.
    (2016) Phonetic symbolism and memory for advertisements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 1088–1092. 10.1002/acp.3284
    https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3284 [Google Scholar]
11. Burns, M. K.
    (1999) Test-retest reliability of individual student acquisition and retention rates as measured by instructional assessment. Doctoral dissertation. Berrien Springs: Andrews University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304560113?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
12. Campo, R., Reinoso-Carvalho, F., & Rosato, P.
    (2021) Wine experiences: A review from a multisensory perspective. Applied Sciences, 11(10), Article 4488. 10.3390/app11104488
    https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104488 [Google Scholar]
13. Cancino, M.
    (2021) Incidental vocabulary learning and retention of EFL learners: To what extent is topic interest a factor?. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 31–52. 10.1075/resla.19049.can
    https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.19049.can [Google Scholar]
14. Cancino, M.
    (2023) Topic interest increases L2 incidental vocabulary learning and effective dictionary look-up behaviour. Learning and Motivation, 831, Article 101920. 10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101920
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101920 [Google Scholar]
15. Childers, T. L., & Jass, J.
    (2002) All dressed up with something to say: Effects of typeface semantic associations on brand perceptions and consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 93–106. 10.1207/S15327663JCP1202_03
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1202_03 [Google Scholar]
16. Coltheart, V., Mondy, S., Dux, P. E., & Stephenson, L.
    (2004) Effects of orthographic and phonological word length on memory for lists shown at RSVP and STM rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(4), 815–826. 10.1037/0278‑7393.30.4.815
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.815 [Google Scholar]
17. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)
    Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). (n.d.). The CEFR levels. Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/level-descriptions
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cortese, M. J., Khanna, M. M., & Von Nordheim, D.
    (2019) Incidental memory for colour word associates processed in colour naming and reading aloud tasks: Is a blue ocean more memorable than a yellow one?. Memory, 27(7), 924–930. 10.1080/09658211.2019.1607877
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1607877 [Google Scholar]
19. Diederich, C.
    (2015) Sensory adjectives in the discourse of food: A frame-semantic approach to language and perception. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.16
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.16 [Google Scholar]
20. Endo, Y. A.
    (2010) The effects of topic interest on the vocabulary retention in third grade students with and without learning disabilities. Doctoral dissertation. New York: Columbia University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/753915719?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses
21. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1994) Lexicography and ethnographic semantics. Supplement to the Proceedings of the 6th EURALEX International Congress, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. https://www.hjverkuyl.nl/personal/pdf/euralex.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fillmore, C. J.
    (2006) Frame semantics. InD. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp.373–400). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199901.373
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.373 [Google Scholar]
23. Fritz, T. H., Schütte, F., Steixner, A., Contier, O., Obrig, H., & Villringer, A.
    (2019) Musical meaning modulates word acquisition. Brain and Language, 1901, 10–15. 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.12.001 [Google Scholar]
24. Ganushchak, L. Y., Krott, A., Frisson, S., & Meyer, A. S.
    (2013) Processing words and Short Message Service shortcuts in sentential contexts: An eye movement study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(1), 163–179. 10.1017/S0142716411000658
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000658 [Google Scholar]
25. Gearhardt, A. N., Davis, C., Kuschner, R., & Brownell, K. D.
    (2011) The addiction potential of hyperpalatable foods. Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 4(3), 140–145. 10.2174/1874473711104030140
    https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473711104030140 [Google Scholar]
26. Goldberg, L. S.
    (2017) Understanding self-control, motivation, and attention in the context of eating behavior. Master’s thesis. Williamsburg: College of William and Mary. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1499450056/
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gong, S.-P., & Ahrens, K.
    (2007) Processing conceptual metaphors in on-going discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(4), 313–330. 10.1080/10926480701528121
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701528121 [Google Scholar]
28. Hall, K. D.
    (2018) Did the food environment cause the obesity epidemic?. Obesity, 26(1), 11–13. 10.1002/oby.22073
    https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22073 [Google Scholar]
29. Heiltjes, S.
    (2014) Touching brands: The effects of multisensory packaging design on brand and product perception and evaluation. Master’s thesis. Enschede: University of Twente. https://essay.utwente.nl/66051/
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hervet, G., Guérard, K., Tremblay, S., & Chtourou, M. S.
    (2010) Is banner blindness genuine? Eye tracking internet text advertising. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 708–716. 10.1002/acp.1742
    https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1742 [Google Scholar]
31. Höltje, G., Lubahn, B., & Mecklinger, A.
    (2019) The congruent, the incongruent, and the unexpected: Event-related potentials unveil the processes involved in schematic encoding. Neuropsychologia, 1311, 285–293. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.013 [Google Scholar]
32. Hussain, S.
    (2018) Brand image and customer loyalty through sensory marketing strategies — A study on international fast food chain restaurants. International Journal of Management Studies, V[2(7)], 32. 10.18843/ijms/v5i2(7)/05
    https://doi.org/10.18843/ijms/v5i2(7)/05 [Google Scholar]
33. Johnson, T. M.
    (2025) The effects of frame-semantically (in)congruent food labels on taste in non-native English speakers. Lingua, 3151, Article 103875. 10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103875
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103875 [Google Scholar]
34. Johnson, T. M., & Pfenninger, S. E.
    (2021) Tasty words: Using frame semantics to enhance consumer liking of potato chips and apples. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 79–94. 10.1111/ijal.12323
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12323 [Google Scholar]
35. Joshi, S., Domb, M., Chanda, B., & Bais, A.
    (2022) Evaluating the impact of storytelling ads on consumer purchase intention. Journal of Service Science and Management, 15(1), 10–22. 10.4236/jssm.2022.151002
    https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2022.151002 [Google Scholar]
36. Jun, Y., & Lee, H.
    (2022) A sound brand identity design: The interplay between sound symbolism and typography on brand attitude and memory. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 641, Article 102724. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102724
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102724 [Google Scholar]
37. Kaan, J., van Kleef, E., & van Trijp, H. C. M.
    (2023) Desire dynamics over repeated intake of a hyper-palatable food. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.4311232
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4311232 [Google Scholar]
38. Kachoub, B., & Hilgendorf, S. K.
    (2020) Quinlingualism in the Maghreb? English use in Moroccan outdoor advertising. English Today, 36(2), 3–16. 10.1017/S0266078419000221
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078419000221 [Google Scholar]
39. Khurram, M., Qadeer, F., & Sheeraz, M.
    (2018) The role of brand recall, brand recognition and price consciousness in understanding actual purchase. Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(2), 219–241. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3215875
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kontaxopoulou, D., Beratis, I. N., Fragkiadaki, S., Pavlou, D., Andronas, N., Yannis, G., Economou, A., Papanicolaou, A. C., & Papageorgiou, S. G.
    (2018) Exploring the profile of incidental memory in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 65(2), 617–627. 10.3233/JAD‑180328
    https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180328 [Google Scholar]
41. Körner, A., & Rummer, R.
    (2022) Valence sound symbolism across language families: A comparison between Japanese and German. Language and Cognition, 15(2), 337–354. 10.1017/langcog.2022.39
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2022.39 [Google Scholar]
42. Krishna, A., Lwin, M. O., & Morrin, M.
    (2010) Product scent and memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 57–67. 10.1086/649909
    https://doi.org/10.1086/649909 [Google Scholar]
43. Lee, S., & Baack, D. W.
    (2014) Meaning or sound? The effects of brand name fluency on brand recall and willingness to buy. Journal of Promotion Management, 20(5), 521–536. 10.1080/10496491.2014.946203
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2014.946203 [Google Scholar]
44. Lee, S. Y., & Shen, F.
    (2009) Joint advertising and brand congruity: Effects on memory and attitudes. Journal of Promotion Management, 15(4), 484–498. 10.1080/10496490903276874
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10496490903276874 [Google Scholar]
45. Li, H., & Lo, H.-Y.
    (2015) Do you recognize its brand? The effectiveness of online in-stream video advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 44(3), 208–218. 10.1080/00913367.2014.956376
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.956376 [Google Scholar]
46. Lim, Y. M., Yap, C. S., & Lau, T.-C.
    (2011) The effectiveness of online advertising in purchase decision: Liking, recall and click. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(9), 1517–1524.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Lochbuehler, K., Mercincavage, M., Tang, K. Z., Dana Tomlin, C., Cappella, J. N., & Strasser, A. A.
    (2017) Effect of message congruency on attention and recall in pictorial health warning labels. Tobacco Control, 27(3), 266–271. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol‑2016‑053615
    https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053615 [Google Scholar]
48. Lupyan, G., & Casasanto, D.
    (2015) Meaningless words promote meaningful categorization. Language and Cognition, 7(2), 167–193. 10.1017/langcog.2014.21
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.21 [Google Scholar]
49. Mackay, L. M.
    (2017) Image memory for hyperpalatable foods in university aged females. Master’s thesis. Owensboro: Brescia University. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/brescia_psych_uht/3/
    [Google Scholar]
50. Micu, C. C., & Coulter, R. A.
    (2010) Advertising in English in nonnative English-speaking markets: The effect of language and self-referencing in advertising in Romania on ad attitudes. Journal of East-West Business, 16(1), 67–84. 10.1080/10669860903558433
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10669860903558433 [Google Scholar]
51. Mike, J. N.
    (2007) Fast food: One small bite for man, one giant problem for mankind. Professionalization of Exercise Physiology, 10(5).
    [Google Scholar]
52. Monteiro, C., Cannon, G., Lawrence, M., da Costa Louzada, M. L., & Machado, P. P.
    (2019) Ultra-processed foods, diet quality and human health. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Moorman, M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G.
    (2002) The effects of magazine-induced psychological responses and thematic congruence on memory and attitude toward the ad in a real-life setting. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 27–40. 10.1080/00913367.2002.10673683
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673683 [Google Scholar]
54. Nederstigt, U., & Hilberink-Schulpen, B.
    (2018) Advertising in a foreign language or the consumers’ native language?. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 30(1), 2–13. 10.1080/08961530.2017.1363008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2017.1363008 [Google Scholar]
55. North, A. C., Sheridan, L. P., & Areni, C. S.
    (2016) Music congruity effects on product memory, perception, and choice. Journal of Retailing, 92(1), 83–95. 10.1016/j.jretai.2015.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.06.001 [Google Scholar]
56. Packard, P. A., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Bunzeck, N., Nicolás, B., de Diego-Balaguer, R., & Fuentemilla, L.
    (2017) Semantic congruence accelerates the onset of the neural signals of successful memory encoding. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(2), 291–301. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1622‑16.2016
    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1622-16.2016 [Google Scholar]
57. Popkin, B. M., & Ng, S. W.
    (2022) The nutrition transition to a stage of high obesity and noncommunicable disease prevalence dominated by ultra-processed foods is not inevitable. Obesity Reviews, 23(1), Article e13366. 10.1111/obr.13366
    https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13366 [Google Scholar]
58. Preziosi, M. A., & Coane, J. H.
    (2017) Remembering that big things sound big: Sound symbolism and associative memory. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 21, Article 10. 10.1186/s41235‑016‑0047‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0047-y [Google Scholar]
59. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
60. Rit, M. P., Croijmans, I., & Speed, L. J.
    (2019) High-tempo and stinky: High arousal sound-odor congruence affects product memory. Multisensory Research, 32(4–5), 347–366. 10.1163/22134808‑20191410
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-20191410 [Google Scholar]
61. Saint-Aubin, J., Beaudry, O., Guitard, D., Pâquet, M., & Guérard, K.
    (2020) The word length effect in backward recall: The role of response modality. Memory, 28(5), 692–700. 10.1080/09658211.2020.1762896
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1762896 [Google Scholar]
62. Schwarz, N., & Jalbert, M.
    (2020) When (fake) news feels true: Intuitions of truth and the acceptance and correction of misinformation. InR. Greifeneder, M. Jaffe, E. Newman & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp.73–89). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429295379‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295379-7 [Google Scholar]
63. Sheinin, D. A., Varki, S., & Ashley, C.
    (2011) The differential effect of ad novelty and message usefulness on brand judgments. Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 5–17. 10.2753/JOA0091‑3367400301
    https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400301 [Google Scholar]
64. Simola, J., Kivikangas, M., Kuisma, J., & Krause, C. M.
    (2013) Attention and memory for newspaper advertisements: Effects of ad-editorial congruency and location. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(4), 429–442. 10.1002/acp.2918
    https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2918 [Google Scholar]
65. Sonbul, S.
    (2015) Fatal mistake, awful mistake, or extreme mistake? Frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocational processing*. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 419–437. 10.1017/S1366728914000674
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000674 [Google Scholar]
66. Sonier, R.-P., Poirier, M., Guitard, D., & Saint-Aubin, J.
    (2020) A round Bouba is easier to remember than a curved Kiki: Sound-symbolism can support associative memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 271, 776–782. 10.3758/s13423‑020‑01733‑8
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01733-8 [Google Scholar]
67. Speed, L. J., & Majid, A.
    (2019) Linguistic features of fragrances: The role of grammatical gender and gender associations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 811, 2063–2077. 10.3758/s13414‑019‑01729‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01729-0 [Google Scholar]
68. Stice, E., Burger, K., & Yokum, S.
    (2013) Caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable foods. Neuroimage, 671, 322–330. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.028
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.028 [Google Scholar]
69. Tehan, G., & Tolan, G. A.
    (2007) Word length effects in long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(1), 35–48. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.015 [Google Scholar]
70. Winter, B.
    (2019) Sensory linguistics: Language, perception, and metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.20
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.20 [Google Scholar]
71. Wirag, A., Li, Y., & Zhang, B.
    (2022) Applying cognitive linguistics to foreign language teaching and learning: Addressing current research challenges. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 9(2), 185–201. 10.1075/cogls.21010.wir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.21010.wir [Google Scholar]
72. Wulff, S., Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T.
    (2007) Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. InG. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp.265–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.136.17wul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.17wul [Google Scholar]
73. Yorkston, E., & De Mello, G. E.
    (2005) Linguistic gender marking and categorization. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 224–234. 10.1086/432232
    https://doi.org/10.1086/432232 [Google Scholar]
74. Young, J.
    (2021) A return to tradition: The significance of baking during COVID-19. Digest: A Journal of Foodways and Culture, 8(1/2), 27–42.
    [Google Scholar]