1887
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper is about gradation of meaning in English, the situation in which the degree of the quality of a word increases or decreases, caused conceptually by communicative demands and expressed lexically by other words called degree adverbs. The choice of a degree adverb reflects the speaker's viewpoint and influences the listener’s reception of the message. With reference to this phenomenon, the paper explores three fundamental tenets of Cognitive Grammar. The first is that a linguistic item forms a category of interrelated senses. On this basis, degree adverbs are argued to acquire new senses relative to context of use. The second is that the meaning of a linguistic item is best understood in terms of the domain to which it belongs. On this basis, degree adverbs are argued to form sets in which they highlight different facets. The third is that the use of a linguistic item is motivated by the particular construal imposed on a scene. On this basis, the use of a degree adverb is argued to result from the particular construal the speaker chooses to describe a situation. Degree adverbs are found to be linguistic devices used to fine-tune a stance. A change in a stance requires a change in a degree adverb.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.3.2.02ham
2017-02-13
2019-11-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biber, Douglas , Johansson, Stig , Leech, Geoffrey , Conrad, Susan , Finegan, Edward , & Quirk, Randolph
    (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written english. Essex: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolinger, Dwight
    (1972) Degree words. Paris: Mouten. doi: 10.1515/9783110877786
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877786 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary (2003) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamawand, Zeki
    (2011) Morphology in English: Word formation in cognitive grammar. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2016) Semantics: A cognitive account of linguistic meaning. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Huddleston, Rodney , & Geoffrey Pullum
    (2005) A student’s introduction to English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815515
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815515 [Google Scholar]
  7. Langacker, Ronald
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1988) A view of linguistic semantics. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 49–90). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.50.04lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.50.04lan [Google Scholar]
  9. (1991a) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 2. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1991b) Concept, image and symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1999) Grammar and conceptualisation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110800524
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Leech, Geoffrey , et al.
    (2001) An A-Z of english grammar and usage. Essex: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Longman dictionary of contemporary English (2009) Harlow: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Merriam Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English (2005) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Peters, Pam
    (2004) The Cambridge guide to English usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511487040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487040 [Google Scholar]
  18. Quirk, Randolph , Greenbaum, Sidney , Leech, Geoffrey , Svartvik, Jan , & Crystal, David
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Swan, Michael
    (2005) Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Teschner, Richard V. , & Eston E. Evans
    (2007) Analyzing the grammar of English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.3.2.02ham
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): category , construal , domain , gradation and scale.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error