Metaphor and metonymy interaction patterns in Modern Greek

References

1. Antonopoulou, E. , & Nikiforidou, K
   (2011) Construction grammar and conventional discourse: A construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2594–2609. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.013 [Google Scholar]
2. Athanasiadou, A
   (2014) Metaphors and metonymies for the (conceptualization and expression of the) state of no emotion in English and Greek. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 27(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1075/resla.27.1.01ath
   https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.1.01ath [Google Scholar]
3. Barcelona, A
   (2007) The role of metonymy in meaning construction at discourse level. In G. Radden , Klaus-Michael Köpcke , T. Berg & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 51–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.136.06bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.06bar [Google Scholar]
4. Barcelona, A
   (2010) Metonymic inferencing and second language acquisition. In J. Littlemore & C. Juchem-Grundmann (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics in second language learning and teaching. AILA Review, 23, 134–154.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Croft, W
   (1993) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(4), 335–370. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.4.335
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.4.335 [Google Scholar]
6. Croft, W. , & Cruse, D.A
   (2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
7. Fried, M. & Östman, J.-O
   (2004) Construction grammar. A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.2.02fri
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.2.02fri [Google Scholar]
8. Geeraerts, D
   (2002) The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 435–465). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Goldberg, A
   (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Goossens, L
    (1995) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in figurative expressions for linguistic action. In L. Goossens , P. Pauwels , B. Rudzka-Ostyn , Anne-Marie. Simon-Vandenbergen & J. Vanparys (Eds.), By word of mouth: Metaphor, metonymy and linguistic action in a cognitive perspective (pp. 159–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.33.06goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.33.06goo [Google Scholar]
11. Grady, J
    (2007) Metaphor. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.188–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jackendoff, R
    (1999) What is a concept, that a person may grasp it?In E. Margolis & St. Laurence (Eds.), Concepts: Core readings (pp.305–333). Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kövecses, Z
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lakoff, G
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
16. Marmaridou, S
    (2010) Cognitive, cultural, and constructional motivations of polysemy and semantic change: The case of the Greek ψυχή. Pragmatics and Cognition, 18(1), 68–110. doi: 10.1075/pc.18.1.04mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18.1.04mar [Google Scholar]
17. Marmaridou, S
    (2013) Towards a constructional account of indefinite uses of proper names in Modern Greek. In N. Lavidas , Th. Alexiou , & A. Sougari (Eds.), Major trends in theoretical and applied linguistics. Selected papers from the 20th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (pp.67–98). London: Versita de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Panther, K.W. , & Thornburg, L
    (2007) Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J
    (2000) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J
    (2002) From semantic underdetermination via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum. An International Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 107–143.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. , & Galera-Masegosa, A
    (2011) Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3(1), 1–29. doi: 10.6035/LanguageV.2011.3.2
    https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2011.3.2 [Google Scholar]
22. Stylianoudaki, E
    (2012) Metaphor and metonymy: Theory and applications. Undergraduate dissertation. Department of Primary Education, University of Crete.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sullivan, K
    2013 Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.14 [Google Scholar]
24. Theodoropoulou, M
    (2012) Metaphor-metonymies of joy and happiness in Greek. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 156–183. doi: 10.1075/rcl.10.1.05the
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.10.1.05the [Google Scholar]