Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Cognitive linguistics as a disciplinary school of thought concerns itself with investigating the relationship between human language, the mind and socio-physical experience. It sees language as embedded in the overall cognitive capacities of man, places special emphasis on topics such as the structural characteristics of natural language categorization including, but not limited to, prototypicality, systematic polysemy, cognitive models, mental imagery, and metaphor. This study examined sexual euphemisms and dysphemisms in the Kenyan Dholuo within the framework of Cognitive Linguistics, specifically anchoring itself on Conceptual Integration Theory (Fauconnier and Turner 2002). The study had two objectives: to identify and explain the sex-related dysphemistic words and phrases in Dholuo and to account for the cognitive processes in the creation of sex-related euphemisms. To achieve its objectives, the study used a descriptive design in which the researcher identified the sex-related dysphemisms by asking native Dholuo speakers to name the male and female sexual organs and sex- related physiological processes associated with both males and females. In addition, the respondents were asked to give the alternative terms that were used to refer to the sex-related dysphemistic terms mentioned. The euphemisms collected were analyzed using Conceptual Integration Theory. They were mapped into the different kinds of conceptual mappings (also known as the mental spaces). The study found out that Conceptual Integration Theory adequately and appropriately accounted for the euphemisms in Dholuo in terms of their interpretation. It provides solid tools for understanding, interpreting and accounting for the euphemisms in Dholuo. It is also demonstrated that not only is there a gendered usage of both euphemisms and dysphemisms, but also that their use is socially and culturally constrained. It is concluded that, just like in other languages, Dholuo euphemisms and dysphemisms are analyzable from a cognitive linguistics perspective


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Agyekum, K
    (2002) Menstruation as a verbal taboo among the Akan of Ghana. Journal of Anthropological Research, 58(3), 367–387. doi: 10.1086/jar.58.3.3631182
    https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.58.3.3631182 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan, K. , & Burridge, K
    (2006) Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511617881
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bousfield, D
    (2007) Never a truer word said in jest: A pragmastylistics analysis of impoliteness as banter in Shakespeare’s Henry IV. London: Phoebus Publisher.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, P. , & Levinson, S.C
    (1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena . In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burridge, K
    (2004) Blooming English: Observations on the Roots, Cultivation and Hybrids of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cameron, D
    (1995) Naming of parts: Gender, culture and the terms for the penis among American college students. In Terry Lovel (Ed.), Feminist cultural studies II. Cheltenham.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coates, J
    (1997) One-at-a-time: The organization of men’s talk. In S. Johnson & U.H. Meinhof (Eds.), Language and masculinity (pp. 107–129). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coulson, S. , & Oakley, T
    (2002) Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3), 175–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dare, S.A
    (2005) Sexual discourse in Niyi Osundare’s poetry: A sociolinguistic reading. African Study Monographs, 26(2), 89–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Domínguez, P. , & Benedito, F
    (2000).Lo que nunca se aprendio en clase. Eufemismos y disfemismos en el lenguaje erotico ingles. Granada: Comares.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Duda, B
    (2011) Euphemisms and dysphemisms: In search of a boundary line. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 45, 3–19. doi: 10.5209/rev_CLAC.2011.v45.1
    https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CLAC.2011.v45.1 [Google Scholar]
  12. Esperas, M.V
    (2010) Braving the waters: The ups and downs of metaphorical concepts in language learning. US-China Foreign Language Journal, 8.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Evans, V
    (2006) Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 491–534. doi: 10.1515/COG.2006.016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.016 [Google Scholar]
  14. Evans, V. , & Green, M
    (2006) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Farghal, M
    (1995) Euphemisms in Arabic: A Gricean interpretation. A Journal of Anthropological Linguistics, 37(3), 366–378.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fauconnier, G. , & Turner, M
    (2002).The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fernández, E
    (2008) Sex-related euphemism and dysphemism: An analysis in terms of conceptual metaphor theory. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo American studies, 32 (2), 95–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gathigia, M
    (2010) A cognitive linguistic approach in the study of euphemisms in Gĩkũyũ. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kenyatta University, Nairobi.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Grady, J.E. , Oakley, T. , & Coulson, S
    (1999) Blending and metaphor. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, (pp.101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.175.07gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.07gra [Google Scholar]
  20. Gumperz, J
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hughes, G
    (2000) A history of English words. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jay, T
    (2000) Why we curse: A neuro- psycho-social theory of speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.91
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.91 [Google Scholar]
  23. Katamba, F
    (1994) English words. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203205280
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203205280 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kelinger, F.N
    (1969) Research in Education. In R. Ebel , V. Noll , & R. Bauer (Eds). Encyclopedia of Educational Research (4th ed., pp.1127–1134). New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kövesces, Z
    (2000) Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kramsch, C
    (1998) Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
    (1980/ 2003) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mugenda, O. , & Mugenda, A
    (1999) Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi: African Centre for Technology Studies Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rawson, H
    (1981) A dictionary of euphemisms and other double-talk. New York: Crown Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Risch, B
    (1987) Language in society. Women’s derogatory terms for men: That’s right, dirty words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Santaemilia, J
    (2005) The language of sex: Saying and not saying. Dipòsito Legal: Universitat de València.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Stanley, P.J
    (1977) The prostitute: Paradigmatic woman. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Trudgill, P
    (1974) Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. Harmond Sworth: PeBooks Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1983) Sociolinguistics. London: Penguin Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ullman, S
    (1981) Semantics: An introduction to the science of meaning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Valenzuela, J. , & Soriano, C
    (2005) Conceptual metaphor and empirical methods. Barcelona English Language and Literature Studies, (BELLS)14, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cognitive linguistics; conceptual integration theory.; Dholuo; dysphemisms; euphemisms
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error