Evaluating the relative effects of cognitive approach with 3D content and non-cognitive approach on the development of EFL learners’ knowledge about the different degrees of sureness

References

1. Anthony, L
   (2014) AntConc 3.4.3. Waseda University.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Armstrong, J
   (2012) Natural learning in higher education. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 2426–2433). Heidelberg: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berendi, M. , Csάbi, S. , & Kövecses, Z
   (2008) Using conceptual metaphors and metonymies in vocabulary teaching. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 101–132). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boers, F
   (2013) Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary: Assessment and integration. Language Teaching, 46(2), 208–224. doi: 10.1017/S0261444811000450
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000450 [Google Scholar]
5. Bybee, J
   (2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
6. Csάbi, S
   (2004) A cognitive linguistic view of polysemy in English and its implication for teaching. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp.233–256). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199857.233
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199857.233 [Google Scholar]
7. Gao, L. , & Meng, G
   (2010) A study on the effect of metaphor awareness raising on Chinese EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and retention. Canadian Social Sciences, 6(2), 110–124.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Grady, J
   (1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.175.06gra
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.06gra [Google Scholar]
9. Hyland, K
   (2000) Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness, 9(4), 179–197. doi: 10.1080/09658410008667145
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667145 [Google Scholar]
10. Hyland, K. , & Milton, J
    (1997) Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of second language writing, 6(2), 183–205. doi: 10.1016/S1060‑3743(97)90033‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3 [Google Scholar]
11. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M
    (2003) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
13. Kömür, S. , & Cimen, S
    (2009) Using conceptual metaphors in teaching idioms in a foreign language context. Soshal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (İLKE), 29, 205–222.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Li, T.F
    (2009) Metaphor, image, and image schemas in second language pedagogy: The acquisition of metaphorical expressions, idioms, and proverbs by Chinese Learners of English. Koln: Lambert Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ohori, T
    (2002) Cognitive linguistics. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ohori, T. , & Sen, B
    (2012) Metaphor as two-way synecdoche: A critical assessment. JELS, 30, 320–326.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Rosch, E
    (1978) Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Skoufaki, S
    (2008) Conceptual metaphoric meaning clues in two idiom presentation methods. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 101–132). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Takimoto, M
    (2015) Assertions and lexical invisibility in EFL learners’ essays. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 85–99. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.009 [Google Scholar]
20. Tyler, A. , Mueller, C. , & Ho, V
    (2010) Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning: The English modals. AILA Review, 23, 30–49. doi: 10.1075/aila.23.03tyl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.03tyl [Google Scholar]
21. Tyler, A. , Mueller, C. , & Ho, V
    (2012) Experiment #2: Comparing the efficacy of a CL-based approach with a traditional approach to teaching to, for and at . In A. Tyler , Cognitive linguistics and second language learning (pp.160–164). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Yasuda, S
    (2010) Learning phrasal verbs through conceptual metaphors: A case of Japanese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 250–273. doi: 10.5054/tq.2010.219945
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.219945 [Google Scholar]
23. Weimer, M
    (2002) Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Wright, G
    (2011) Student-centered learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 92–97.
    [Google Scholar]