Metaphor variation in Englishes around the world

References

1. Davies, M. , & Fuchs, R.
   (2015) Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide, 36(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav
   https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav [Google Scholar]
2. Geeraerts, D.
   (2016) The sociosemiotic commitment. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 527–542. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0058
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0058 [Google Scholar]
3. Geeraerts, D. , Kristiansen, G. , & Peirsman, Y.
   (Eds.) (2010) Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110226461
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226461 [Google Scholar]
4. Kövecses, Z.
   (2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feelings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kövecses, Z.
   (2005) Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
6. Kristiansen, G. , & Dirven, R.
   (Eds.) (2008) Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199154
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199154 [Google Scholar]
7. Polzenhagen, F. , & Wolf, H. -G.
   (2010) Investigating culture from a linguistic perspective: An exemplification with Hong Kong English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 58(3), 281–303. doi: 10.1515/zaa.2010.58.3.281
   https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa.2010.58.3.281 [Google Scholar]
8. Pütz, M. , Robinson, J. , & Reif, M.
   (Eds.) (2014) Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Social and cultural variation in cognition and language use. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.59
   https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.59 [Google Scholar]
9. Sharifian, F.
   (2008) Cultural model of Home in Aboriginal children’s English. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics (pp.333–352). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199154.3.333
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199154.3.333 [Google Scholar]
10. Sharifian, F.
    (2015) Cultural Linguistics and world Englishes. World Englishes, 34(4), 515–532. doi: 10.1111/weng.12156
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12156 [Google Scholar]
11. Sharifian, F. , Yu, N. , Dirven, R. , & Niemeier, S.
    (Eds.) (2008) Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199109 [Google Scholar]
12. Wolf, H. -G. , & Chan, T.
    (2016) Understanding Asia by means of cognitive sociolinguistics and cultural linguistics. The example of GHOSTS in Hong Kong English. In G. Leitner , A. Hashim , & H. -G. Wolf (Eds.), Communicating with Asia: The future of English as a global language (pp.249–266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107477186.017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107477186.017 [Google Scholar]
13. Wolf, H. -G. , & Polzenhagen, F.
    (2007) Fixed expressions as manifestations of cultural conceptualizations: Examples from African varieties of English. In P. Skandera (Ed.), Phraseology and culture in English (pp.399–435). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197860.399
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197860.399 [Google Scholar]
14. Wolf, H. -G. , & Polzenhagen, F.
    (2009) World Englishes. A cognitive sociolinguistic approach. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199222
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199222 [Google Scholar]