Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Binder, J. , & Desai, R.
    (2011) The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brandon, R. , & Hornstein, N.
    (1986) From icons to symbols: Some speculations on the origins of language. Biology and Philosophy, 1, 169–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bunge, M.
    (2014) The mind–body problem: A psychobiological approach. London: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cardona, J. ,
    (2014) How embodied is action language? Neurological evidence from motor diseases. Cognition, 131(2), 311–322. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cevasco, J. , & Marmolejo-Ramos, F.
    (2013) The importance of studying the role of Prosody in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45 (1), 21–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chatterjee, A.
    (2010) Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition, 2(1), 79–116. doi: 10.1515/langcog.2010.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2010.004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chomsky, N.
    (1994) Language and thought. Washington, D.C.: Moyer Bell.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark, A.
    (1998) Embodiment and the philosophy of mind. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 43, 35–51. doi: 10.1017/S135824610000429X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S135824610000429X [Google Scholar]
  9. Dahl, C. , Rasch, M. , Tomonaga, M. , & Adachi, I.
    (2013) The face inversion effect in non-human primates revisited: An investigation in chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes). Scientific Reports, 3. doi: 10.1038/srep02504
    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02504 [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans, N. , & Levinson, S.
    (2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(05), 429–448. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
  11. Fernandino, L. ,
    (2016) Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: A framework for embodied semantics. Cerebral Cortex, 26 (5), 2018–2034. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv020 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fitch, W. & Hauser, M.
    (2004) Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science, 303(5656), 377–380. doi: 10.1126/science.1089401
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089401 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gentner, T. , Fenn, K. , Margoliash, D. , & Nusbaum, H.
    (2006) Recursive syntactic pattern learning by Songbirds. Nature, 440(7088), 1204–1207. doi: 10.1038/nature04675
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04675 [Google Scholar]
  14. Glenberg, A.
    (2015) Few believe the world is flat: How embodiment is changing the scientific understanding of cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 165–171. doi: 10.1037/cep0000056
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000056 [Google Scholar]
  15. Harnad, S.
    (1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346. doi: 10.1016/0167‑2789(90)90087‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M.
    (1980) The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lenneberg, E.
    (1964) A biological perspective of language. In E. Lenneberg (Ed.), New Directions in the Study of Language (pp.65–88). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1962) The relationship of language to the formation of concepts. Synthese, 14(2), 103–109. doi: 10.1007/BF00881988
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881988 [Google Scholar]
  19. Leshinskaya, A. , & Caramazza, A.
    (2016) For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: moving beyond the grounding issue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–11. doi: 10.3758/s13423‑015‑0870‑z
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0870-z [Google Scholar]
  20. Mahon, B.
    (2015) The burden of embodied cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 172–178. doi: 10.1037/cep0000060
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000060 [Google Scholar]
  21. Merritt, D. , Casasanto, D. , & Brannon, E.
    (2010) Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans. Cognition, 117(2), 191–202. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.011 [Google Scholar]
  22. Pinker, S.
    (1995) The language instinct: The new science of language and mind. London. Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Poyatos, F.
    (1984) The multichannel reality of discourse: Language-paralanguage-kinesics and the totality of communicative systems. Language Sciences, 6(2), 307–337. doi: 10.1016/S0388‑0001(84)80022‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(84)80022-4 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pulvermüller, F.
    (2013) How neurons make meaning: Brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(9), 458–470. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith, L. , & Colunga, E.
    (2012) Developing categories and concepts. In M. Spivey , K. McRae , & M. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.283–308). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139029377.019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139029377.019 [Google Scholar]
  26. Toivonen, I. , Csúri, P. , & van der Zee, E.
    (Eds.) (2016) Structures in the mind. Essays on language, music, and cognition in honor of Ray Jackendoff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tomasello, M.
    (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Vannasing, P. ,
    (2016) Distinct hemispheric specializations for native and non-native languages in one-day-old newborns identified by fNIRS. Neuropsychologia, 84, 63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.038
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.038 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error