1887
Volume 45, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1810-7478
  • E-ISSN: 2589-5230

Abstract

Abstract

The possessive construction in Mandarin is similar to English prenominal possessives except that maximality is presupposed only for cases involving inherently relational nouns. In this paper, I adopt the hypothesized split of argument and modifier genitives proposed by Partee & Borschev (20012003) and argue that modifier-genitives can occur NP-internally in Mandarin possessives, whose appearance is restricted to cases with non-relational nouns. The discrepancy of the maximality presupposition observed in Mandarin can thus be captured since non-relational nouns can have a split of interpretations between argument and modifier genitives, resulting in a non-maximality reading.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00002.wan
2019-05-31
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/consl.00002.wan.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00002.wan&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abbott, Barbara
    2004 Definiteness and indefiniteness. Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byLaurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 122–149. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker, Chris
    1995Possessive Descriptions. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1998 Partitives, double genitives, and anti-uniqueness. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory16.4:679–717. 10.1023/A:1005917421076
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005917421076 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2011 Possessives and relational nouns. Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, vol.2, ed. byClaudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger and Paul Portner, 1109–1130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shan, and Rint Sybesma
    1999 Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry30.4:509–542. 10.1162/002438999554192
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, and Rint Sybesma
    2009 De as an underspecified classifier: First explorations. Yŭyánxué Lùncóng39:123–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang, Shi-Zhe
    2006 Property theory, adjectives, and modification in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics15.4:343–369. 10.1007/s10831‑006‑9002‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-006-9002-0 [Google Scholar]
  8. Jensen, Per Anker, and Carl Vikner
    1994 Lexical knowledge and the semantic analysis of Danish genitive constructions. Topics in Knowledge-based NLP Systems, ed. byS. L. Hansen and H. Wegener, 37–55. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lyons, Christopher
    1999Definiteness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
  10. Partee, Barbara Hall
    1997 Genitives: A case study. Appendix to Theo M. V. Janssen, ‘Compositionality’. Handbook of Logic and Language, ed. byJohan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, 464–470. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2006 A note on Mandarin possessives, demonstratives and definiteness. Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, ed. byBerry J. Birner and Gregory Ward, 263–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.80.15par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.80.15par [Google Scholar]
  12. Partee, Barbara Hall, and Vladimir Borschev
    2001 Some puzzles of predicate possessives. Perspectives on Semantic, Pragmatic and Discourse. A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, ed. byIstván Kenesei and Robert M. Harnish, 91–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.90.11par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.90.11par [Google Scholar]
  13. 2003 Genitives, relational nouns, and argument-modifier ambiguity. Modifying Adjuncts, ed. byEwald Lang, Claudia Maienborn and Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, 67–112. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110894646.67
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894646.67 [Google Scholar]
  14. Rooth, Mats
    1985 Association with Focus. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Simpson, Andrew
    2002 On the status of “modifying” DE and the structure of the Chinese DP. On the Formal Way to Chinese Languages, ed. bySze-Wing Tang and Chen-Sheng Luther Liu, 74–101. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sproat, Richard, and Chinlin Shih
    1988 Prenominal adjectival ordering in English and Mandarin. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. byJames Blevins and Juli Carter, 465–489. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Stockwell, Robert P., Paul Schachter, and Barbara Hall Partee
    1973The Major Syntactic Structures of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tang, Chih-Chen Jane
    1990 A note on the DP analysis of the Chinese noun phrase. Linguistics28.2:337–354. 10.1515/ling.1990.28.2.337
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1990.28.2.337 [Google Scholar]
  19. Vikner, Carl, and Per Anker Jensen
    2002 A semantic analysis of the English genitive. Interaction of lexical and formal semantics. Studia Linguistica56.2:191–226. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00092
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00092 [Google Scholar]
  20. Woisetschlaeger, Erich
    1983 On the question of definiteness in “An Old Man’s Book”. Linguistic Inquiry14.1:137–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Zamparelli, Roberto
    2005 The structure of (in)definiteness. Lingua115.6:915–936. 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.01.004 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00002.wan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00002.wan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error