1887
Volume 46, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1810-7478
  • E-ISSN: 2589-5230
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

A learner corpus, i.e., a principled collection of contextualized texts produced by second language learners, can be of invaluable help in identifying learners’ needs. Previous learner corpus research has indicated that an area for improvement in second language writing is learners’ use of logical connectors as cohesive devices. While most previous studies have been general surveys that examined a wide range of English connectors, the present one is a more focused investigation, probing into Chinese-speaking learners’ use of concessive connectors. The data is taken from a self-constructed corpus of argumentative essays written by Taiwanese freshmen, who were placed into four proficiency levels. Common errors, including orthographical, syntactic, and semantic ones, were identified and categorized. The frequency distribution of the attested concessive connectors reveals Chinese learners’ development in their use of individual connectors. Difficulties may be attributed to the linguistic complexity of concessive connectors in English and L1 transfer. Moreover, previously identified lexico-syntactic characteristics in learners’ use of English connectors were reconfirmed by our corpus data. More importantly, the pragmatic function of concessive connectors in Chinese learners’ argumentative writing is also addressed. The findings have important pedagogical implications. Pragmatics is an area in need of further attention in learner corpus research, and we have gone some way toward enhancing our understanding of that area.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00014.hsu
2020-05-01
2020-09-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altenberg, Bengt, and Marie Tapper
    1998 The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. Learner English on Computer, ed. bySylviane Granger, 80–93. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell, David M.
    2010Nevertheless, still, and yet: Concessive cancellative discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics42.7:1912–1927. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.010 [Google Scholar]
  3. Berk, Lynn M.
    1999English Syntax: From Word to Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, Douglas, and Federica Barbieri
    2007 Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes26.3:263–286. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolton, Kingsley, Gerald Nelson, and Joseph Hung
    2002 A Corpus-based study of connectors in student writing: Research from The International Corpus of English in Hong Kong (ICE-HK). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics7.2:165–182. 10.1075/ijcl.7.2.02bol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.7.2.02bol [Google Scholar]
  7. Carbonell-Olivares, María
    2009 A corpus-based analysis of the meaning and function of although. International Journal of English Studies9.3:191–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Celce-Murcia, Marianne, and Diane Larsen-Freeman
    1999The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd edition). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Cheryl Wei-yu
    2006 The use of conjunctive adverbials in the academic papers of advanced Taiwanese EFL learners. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics11.1:113–130. 10.1075/ijcl.11.1.05che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.1.05che [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Rong
    1993 Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics20.1:49–75. 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90106‑Y
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90106-Y [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheung, Candice Chi-Hang
    2016 Chinese: Parts of speech. The Routledge Encyclopedia of the Chinese Language, ed. byChan Sin-Wai, 242–294. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheung, Hintat, Jessica Wu, Zhao-Ming Gao, and Siaw-Fong Chung
    2011The Construction of the LTTC English Learner Corpus: Progress Report of NTU-LTTC Joint Research Project on Language Teaching and Language Testing. RetrievedMay 17, 2019, fromwww.lttcelc.org.tw/
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chu, Chauncey Cheng-hsi
    1998A Discourse Grammar of Mandarin Chinese. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson
    2005 A linguistic practice for retracting overstatements: ‘Concessive repair’. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction, ed. byAuli Hakulinen and Margret Selting, 257–288. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.17.14cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.14cou [Google Scholar]
  15. Crewe, William J.
    1990 The illogic of logical connectives. ELT Journal44.4:316–325. 10.1093/elt/44.4.316
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/44.4.316 [Google Scholar]
  16. Crewe, William J., Christine L. Wright, and Matthew Wing-Kwong Leung
    1985 Connectives: On the other hand, who needs them though?Working Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching8:61–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Field, Yvette, and Lee Mee Oi Yip
    1992 A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in the English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English. RELC Journal23.1:15–28. 10.1177/003368829202300102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829202300102 [Google Scholar]
  18. Frodesen, Jan, and Janet Eyring
    2000Grammar Dimensions: Form, Meaning, and Use (Book 4) (2nd edition). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gao, Xia
    2016 A cross-disciplinary corpus-based study on English and Chinese native speakers’ use of linking adverbials in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes24:14–28. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Granger, Sylviane, and Stephanie Tyson
    1996 Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes15.1:17–27. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1996.tb00089.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00089.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics14.2:237–257. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  22. Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hirvela, Alan
    2017 Argumentation and second language writing: Are we missing the boat?Journal of Second Language Writing36:69–74. 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang, Chu-Ren, Shu-Kai Hsieh, and Keh-Jiann Chen
    2017Mandarin Chinese Words and Parts of Speech: A Corpus-based Study. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
    2008 Contrast, concessive, and corrective: Toward a comprehensive study of opposition relations. Journal of Pragmatics40.4:646–675. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuhn, Deanna
    1991The Skills of Argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571350 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuzborska, Irena, and Bill Soden
    2018 The construction of opposition relations in high-, middle-, and low-rated postgraduate ESL Chinese students’ essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes34:68–85. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.03.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.03.013 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakoff, Robin
    1971 If’s, and’s and but’s about conjunctions. Studies in Linguistic Semantics, ed. byCharles J. Fillmore and D. Terence Langėndoen, 115–150. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lam, Yau Wai, Khe Foon Hew, and Kin Fung Chiu
    2018 Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning & Technology22.1:97–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lei, Lei
    2012 Linking adverbials in academic writing on applied linguistics by Chinese doctoral students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes11.3:267–275. 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1981Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lin, Wen-Pin
    2014 Effects of Explicit Instruction on the Uses of Conjunctions to EFL College Students’ Essay Writing. MA thesis, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi.
  33. Liu, Meihua, and George Braine
    2005 Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System33.4:623–636. 10.1016/j.system.2005.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mahlberg, Michaela
    2009 Lexical cohesion: Corpus linguistic theory and its application in English language teaching. Lexical Cohesion and Corpus Linguistics, ed. byJohn Flowerdew and Michaela Mahlberg, 103–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.17.07mah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.17.07mah [Google Scholar]
  35. Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1988 Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text8.3:243–281. 10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243 [Google Scholar]
  36. Milton, John, and Elza Shuk-Ching Tsang
    1993 A corpus-based study of logical connectors in EFL students’ writing: Directions for future research. Lexis in Studies, ed. byRichard Perbertom and Elza Shuk-Ching Tsang, 215–246. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Musi, Elena
    2018 How did you change my view? A corpus-based study of concessions’ argumentative role. Discourse Studies20.2:270–288. 10.1177/1461445617734955
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734955 [Google Scholar]
  38. Narita, Masumi, Chieko Sato, and Masatoshi Sugiura
    2004 Connector usage in the English essay writing of Japanese EFL learners. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, ed. byMaria Teresa Lino, Maria Francisca Xavier, Fátima Ferreira, Rute Costa and Raquel Silva, 1171–1174. Paris, France: European Language Resources Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nussbaum, E. Michael, and Gregory Schraw
    2007 Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students’ writing. The Journal of Experimental Education76.1:59–92. 10.3200/JEXE.76.1.59‑92
    https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.76.1.59-92 [Google Scholar]
  40. Paquot, Magali, and Luke Plonsky
    2017 Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research3.1:61–94. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.03paq
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.03paq [Google Scholar]
  41. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Rayson, Paul
    2008 From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics13.4:519–549. 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray [Google Scholar]
  43. Salkie, Raphael, and Sarah Louise Oates
    1999 Contrast and concession in French and English. Languages in Contrast2.1:27–56. 10.1075/lic.2.1.04sal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.2.1.04sal [Google Scholar]
  44. Shih, Rebecca Hsue-Hueh
    2000 Compiling Taiwanese learner corpus of English. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing5.2:87–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Taboada, Maite, and María de los Ángeles Gómez-González
    2012 Discourse markers and coherence relations: Comparison across markers, languages and modalities. Linguistics and the Human Sciences6.1–3:17–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa, and Johanna Karhukorpi
    2008 Concessive Repair and negotiation of affiliation in e-mail discourse. Journal of Pragmatics40.9:1587–1600. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.018 [Google Scholar]
  47. Thompson, Geoff
    1996Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tono, Yukio
    2012 International Corpus of Crosslinguistic Interlanguage: Project overview and a case study on the acquisition of new verb co-occurrence patterns. Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research, ed. byYukio Tono, Yuji Kawaguchi and Makoto Minegishi, 27–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tufs.4.07ton
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tufs.4.07ton [Google Scholar]
  49. Tsou, Benjamin K., and Olivia Oi Yee Kwong
    2015 Some basic and salient linguistic features across Chinese speech communities from a corpus linguistics perspective. The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ed. byWilliam S-Y. Wang and Chaofen Sun, 601–614. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Rieke, and Allan Janik
    1990An Introduction to Reasoning (2nd edition). London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Vyatkina, Nina, and D. Joseph Cunningham
    2015 Learner corpora and pragmatics. The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, ed. bySylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin and Fanny Meunier, 281–306. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139649414.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.013 [Google Scholar]
  52. Webster, Michael A., Alan Ward, and Kenneth Craig
    1987 Language errors due to the first language inference (Cantonese) produced by Hong Kong students of English. Institute of Language in Education Journal3:63–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Yang, Wenxing, and Ying Sun
    2012 The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education23.1:31–48. 10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  54. Yeung, Lorrita
    2009 Use and misuse of ‘besides’: A corpus study comparing native speakers’ and learners’ English. System37.2:330–342. 10.1016/j.system.2008.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.11.007 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00014.hsu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00014.hsu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error