1887
Volume 46, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1810-7478
  • E-ISSN: 2589-5230

Abstract

Abstract

This research examined sensorimotor adaptation and aftereffect in trained vocalists and non-vocalists whose native language is Mandarin. The adaptive frequency-altered feedback paradigm involving a baseline of normal auditory feedback, a training phase of incrementally or decrementally changed feedback, and a test phase of normal auditory feedback was administered. The participants were asked to produce the sustained vowel /a/, Mandarin /ma1/ (“mother”), and Mandarin /ma2/ (“hemp”). The results show that the vocalists compensated less than the non-vocalists, suggesting that the vocalists’ audio-motor representations for pitch could be more entrenched than the non-vocalists’. All the participants displayed sensorimotor adaptation, indicating that online recalibration is an innate and automatic process. The presence of the aftereffect, however, depended on the stimulus type and vocal training experience. It appeared in all speakers’ responses to downward shift of /ma1/ and /ma2/, but only in the non-vocalists’ responses to /a/.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00015.nin
2020-10-28
2020-11-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/consl.00015.nin.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00015.nin&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Behroozmand, Roozbeh, Nadine Ibrahim, Oleg Korzyukov, Donald A. Robin, and Charles R. Larson
    2013 Left-hemisphere activation is associated with enhanced vocal pitch error detection in musicians with absolute pitch. Brain and Cognition84.1:97–108. 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  2. Burnett, Theresa A., Marcia B. Freeland, Charles R. Larson, and Timothy C. Hain
    1998 Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America103.6:3153–3161. 10.1121/1.423073
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.423073 [Google Scholar]
  3. Camacho, Arturo, and John G. Harris
    2008 A sawtooth waveform inspired pitch estimator for speech and music. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America124.3:1638–1652. 10.1121/1.2951592
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2951592 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Stephanie H., Hanjun Liu, Yi Xu, and Charles R. Larson
    2007 Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America121.2:1157–1163. 10.1121/1.2404624
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2404624 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chon, Hee Cheong, Shelly Jo Kraft, Jingfei Zhang, Torrey Loucks, and Nicoline G. Ambrose
    2013 Individual variability in delayed auditory feedback effects on speech fluency and rate in normally fluent adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research56.2:489–504. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2012/11‑0303)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0303) [Google Scholar]
  6. Cowie, Roddy, and Ellen Douglas-Cowie
    1992Postlingually Acquired Deafness. New York & Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110869125
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110869125 [Google Scholar]
  7. Feng, Yongqiang, Yan Xiao, Yonghong Yan, and Ludo Max
    2017 Adaptation in Mandarin tone production with pitch-shifted auditory feedback: Influence of tonal contrast requirements. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience33.6:734–749. 10.1080/23273798.2017.1421317
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1421317 [Google Scholar]
  8. Hain, Timothy C., Theresa A. Burnett, Swathi Kiran, Charles R. Larson, Shajila Singh, and Mary K. Kenney
    2000 Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex. Experimental Brain Research130.2:133–141. 10.1007/s002219900237
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s002219900237 [Google Scholar]
  9. Houde, John F., and Michael I. Jordan
    1998 Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science279.5354:1213–1216. 10.1126/science.279.5354.1213
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5354.1213 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2002 Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research45.2:295–310. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2002/023)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/023) [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones, Jeffery A., and Dwayne Keough
    2008 Auditory-motor mapping for pitch control in singers and nonsingers. Experimental Brain Research190.3:279–287. 10.1007/s00221‑008‑1473‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1473-y [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones, Jeffery A., and Kevin G. Munhall
    2002 The role of auditory feedback during phonation: Studies of Mandarin tone production. Journal of Phonetics30.3:303–320. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0160
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0160 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2005 Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production. Current Biology15.19:1768–1772. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.063
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.063 [Google Scholar]
  14. Keough, Dwayne, Colin Hawco, and Jeffery A. Jones
    2013 Auditory-motor adaptation to frequency-altered auditory feedback occurs when participants ignore feedback. BMC Neuroscience14, article no. 25. 10.1186/1471‑2202‑14‑25
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-25 [Google Scholar]
  15. Keough, Dwayne, and Jeffery A. Jones
    2009 The sensitivity of auditory-motor representations to subtle changes in auditory feedback while singing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America126.2:837–846. 10.1121/1.3158600
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3158600 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lane, Harlan, and Bernard Tranel
    1971 The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research14.4:677–709. 10.1044/jshr.1404.677
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1404.677 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lane, Harlan, and Jane Wozniak Webster
    1991 Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America89.2:859–866. 10.1121/1.1894647
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894647 [Google Scholar]
  18. Larson, Charles R., Theresa A. Burnett, Jay J. Bauer, Swathi Kiran, and Timothy C. Hain
    2001 Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America110.6:2845–2848. 10.1121/1.1417527
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1417527 [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, Hanjun, Emily Q. Wang, Zhaocong Chen, Peng Liu, Charles R. Larson, and Dongfeng Huang
    2010 Effects of tonal native language on voice fundamental frequency responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalizations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America128.6:3739–3746. 10.1121/1.3500675
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3500675 [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, Hanjun, Michelle Meshman, Roozbeh Behroozmand, and Charles. R. Larson
    2011 Differential effects of perturbation direction and magnitude on the neural processing of voice pitch feedback. Clinical Neurophysiology122.5:951–957. 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.010 [Google Scholar]
  21. Max, Ludo, Marie E. Wallace, and Irena Vincent
    2003 Sensorimotor adaptation to auditory perturbations during speech: Acoustic and kinematic experiments. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. byM. J. Solé, D. Recasens and J. Romero, 1053–1056. Barcelona, Spain: ICPhS Archive.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mollaei, Fatemeh, Douglas M. Shiller, Shari R. Baum, and Vincent L. Gracco
    2016 Sensorimotor control of vocal pitch and formant frequencies in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Research1646:269–277. 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.06.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.06.013 [Google Scholar]
  23. Natke, Ulrich, Thomas M. Donath, and Karl Th. Kalveram
    2003 Control of voice fundamental frequency in speaking versus singing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America113.3:1587–1593. 10.1121/1.1543928
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1543928 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ning, Li-Hsin
    2018 Vocal adaptation in perturbed auditory feedback for L2 learners of Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching15.3:1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ning, Li-Hsin, Chilin Shih, and Torrey M. Loucks
    2014 Mandarin tone learning in L2 adults: A test of perceptual and sensorimotor contributions. Speech Communication63–64:55–69. 10.1016/j.specom.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ning, Li-Hsin, Torrey M. Loucks, and Chilin Shih
    2015 The effects of language learning and vocal training on sensorimotor control of lexical tone. Journal of Phonetics51:50–69. 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Oller, D. Kimbrough, and Rebecca E. Eilers
    1988 The role of audition in infant babbling. Child Development59.2:441–449. 10.2307/1130323
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1130323 [Google Scholar]
  28. Parrella, Benjamin, and John Houde
    2019 Modeling the role of sensory feedback in speech motor control and learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research62.8S:2963–2985. 10.1044/2019_JSLHR‑S‑CSMC7‑18‑0127
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-CSMC7-18-0127 [Google Scholar]
  29. Purcell, David W., and Kevin G. Munhall
    2006 Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: Evidence from real-time formant manipulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America120.2:966–977. 10.1121/1.2217714
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2217714 [Google Scholar]
  30. Scheerer, Nichole E., and Jeffery A. Jones
    2012 The relationship between vocal accuracy and variability to the level of compensation to altered auditory feedback. Neuroscience Letters529.2:128–132. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.09.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.09.012 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sparks, Garen, Dorothy E. Grant, Kathleen Millay, Delaina Walker-Baston, and Linda S. Hynan
    2002 The effect of fast speech rate on stuttering frequency during delayed auditory feedback. Journal of Fluency Disorders27.3:187–201. 10.1016/S0094‑730X(02)00128‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-730X(02)00128-6 [Google Scholar]
  32. Terband, Hayo, Frits van Brenk, and Anniek van Doornik-van der Zee
    2014 Auditory feedback perturbation in children with developmental speech sound disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders51:64–77. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Borsel, John, Gert Reunes, and Nathalie Van den Bergh
    2003 Delayed auditory feedback in the treatment of stuttering: Clients as consumers. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders38.2:119–129. 10.1080/1368282021000042902
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1368282021000042902 [Google Scholar]
  34. Waldstein, Robin S.
    1990 Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: Implications for the role of auditory feedback. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America88.5:2099–2114. 10.1121/1.400107
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.400107 [Google Scholar]
  35. Zarate, Jean Mary, and Robert J. Zatorre
    2005 Neural substrates governing audiovocal integration for vocal pitch regulation in singing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1060.1:404–408. 10.1196/annals.1360.058
    https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1360.058 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2008 Experience-dependent neural substrates involved in vocal pitch regulation during singing. NeuroImage40.4:1871–1887. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.026 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00015.nin
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00015.nin
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error