A corpus-based investigation of semantic and syntactic differences between the two major future tense constructions

References

1. Agirre, Ainara Imaz
   2015 The acquisition of the dative alternation in English by Spanish learners. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics12:63–90.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alotaibi, Abdullah M. , and Hashan Al-ajmi
   2015 The acquisition of the passive alternation by Kuwaiti EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics5.1:44–52. 10.5539/ijel.v5n1p44
   https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v5n1p44 [Google Scholar]
3. Ariamanesh, Ali A. , and Zohreh Shojai
   2018 Markedness hypothesis: Study of English dative and benefactive alternation. Applied Linguistics Research Journal2.3:17–33.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berglund, Ylva
   1997 Future in present-day English: Corpus-based evidence on the rivalry of expressions. ICAME Journal21:7–20.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berglund, Ylva
   2005 Expressions of Future in Present-Day English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   [Google Scholar]
6. British National Corpus (BNC)
   British National Corpus (BNC). Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services, fromwww.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/
7. Bybee, Joan L. , Revere D. Perkins , and William Pagliuca
   1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bybee, Joan L. , and William Pagliuca
   1987 The evolution of future meaning. Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Anna Giacalone-Ramat , Onofrio Carruba and Giuliano Bernini , 109–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.48.09byb
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.48.09byb [Google Scholar]
9. Close, Reginald Arthur
   1977 Some observations on the meaning and function of verb phrases having future references. Studies in English Usage: The Resources of a Present-Day English Corpus for Linguistic Analysis, ed. by Wolf-Dietrich Bald and Robert Ilson , 125–156. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
    2007 Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Givón, Talmy
    1979 From discourse to syntax: Grammar as a processing strategy. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givón , 81–112. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Goldberg, Adele. E.
    1999 The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. The Emergence of Language, ed. by Brian MacWhinney , 197–212. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gries, Stefan Th. , and Anatol Stefanowitsch
    2004 Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics9.1:97–129. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri [Google Scholar]
14. Grimshaw, Jane , and Alan Prince
    1986 A prosodic account of the to-dative alternation. Unpublished manuscript. Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Haegeman, Liliane
    1983  Be going to, gaan, and aller: Some observations on the expression of future time. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching21.2:155–157.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haegeman, Liliane
    1989  Be going to and will: A pragmatic account. Journal of Linguistics25.2:291–317. 10.1017/S0022226700014110
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014110 [Google Scholar]
17. Harris, Brandon. A.
    2013 Expressing Future Time in Spoken Conversational English: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Sitcom Friends. MA thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hawkins, Roger
    1981 Towards an account of the possessive constructions: NP’s N and the N of NP. Journal of Linguistics17.2:247–269. 10.1017/S002222670000699X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670000699X [Google Scholar]
19. Hirakawa, Makiko
    2013 Alternations and argument structure in second language English: Knowledge of two types of intransitive verbs. Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom, ed. by Melinda Whong , Kook-Hee Gil , and Heather Marsden , 117–137. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑6362‑3_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3_7 [Google Scholar]
20. Hopper, Paul J. , and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Joos, Martin
    1968 The English Verbs: Form and Meanings. Madison & London: The University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lee, Dong-Han
    1997 Acquisition of Dative Alternation in English by Second Language Learners. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Leech, Geoffrey
    1970 This bread I break: Language and interpretation. Linguistics and Literary Style, ed. by Donald C. Freeman , 120–128. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Oh, Eunjeong
    2010 Recovery from first-language transfer: The second language acquisition of English double objects by Korean speakers. Second Language Research26.3:407–439. 10.1177/0267658310365786
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310365786 [Google Scholar]
25. Palmer, Frank R.
    1988 The English Verb (2nd edition). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech , and Jan Svartvik
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Schmitt, Norbert
    1998 Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning48.2:281–317. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00042
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00042 [Google Scholar]
28. Schmitt, Norbert
    2008 Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research12.3:329–363. 10.1177/1362168808089921
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921 [Google Scholar]
29. Song, Eu-Jong , and Min-Chang Sung
    2017 A corpus-based study of contextual factors influencing Korean EFL learners’ dative alternation: Lexical verbs, syntactic weights, and information structures. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics40.1:19–39. 10.1075/aral.40.1.03son
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.40.1.03son [Google Scholar]
30. Stefanowitsch, Anatol , and Stefan Th. Gries
    2003 Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8.2:209–243. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
31. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
    2003  Be going to versus will/shall: Does syntax matter?Journal of English Linguistics31.4:295–323. 10.1177/0075424203257830
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424203257830 [Google Scholar]
32. Ultan, Russell
    1978 The nature of future tenses. Universals of Human Language, vol. 3: Word Structure, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg , 83–123. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Wekker, Herman C.
    1976 The Expression of Future Time in Contemporary British English: An Investigation into the Syntax and Semantics of Five Verbal Constructions Expressing Futurity. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Yook, Cheongmin
    2012 L1 influence on ESL learners’ acquisition of English ditransitive constructions. English Teaching67.2:27–50. 10.15858/engtea.67.2.201207.27
    https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.67.2.201207.27 [Google Scholar]
35. Yook, Cheongmin
    2013 The role of frequency in Korean learners’ acquisition of English dative construction. English Teaching68.1:179–200. 10.15858/engtea.68.1.201303.179
    https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.68.1.201303.179 [Google Scholar]