Volume 47, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1810-7478
  • E-ISSN: 2589-5230
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study proposes a novel exploration of perceived prosodic highlights in continuous speech, focusing on the alternative function of indexing and projecting information content deployment in the speech context. Given the assumption that prosodic highlight allocation directly reflects the interlocutors’ information content deployment, this study foregrounds perception-based prominences for indexing both the key information (KEY) and the projector (PJR) that projects the deployment of key/focal information. Two information content planning units (PJR plus its respective projection PJN, and KEY) prompted by prosodic highlights were established, based on quantitative analyses and discriminative acoustic features. Additional analyses confirm a general information distribution across both units, showcasing that the relative projection trajectory size in the PJR-PJN unit is positively correlated to its position within discourse-prosodic units. Current results, therefore, directly substantiate the cognitive explanation of prosodic projection in speech, as evidence beyond syntactic relationships are drawn and prosodic projection is shown to involve perceived prosodic highlight allocation and information deployment in a fixed pattern. Explorations of prosody-prompted projection shed light on a more comprehensive account of the mechanism behind information planning, hence facilitating a deeper understanding of the composition of context prosody and the derivation of linguistic invariants from speech.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Auer, Peter
    1996 On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. Prosody and Conversation: Interactional Studies, ed. byElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, 57–100. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.004 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2005 Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text & Talk25.1:7–36. 10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2009 Online syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences31.1:1–13. 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2015 The temporality of language in interaction: Projection and latency. Temporality in Interaction, ed. byArnulf Deppermann and Susanne Günthner, 27–56. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.27.01aue
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.27.01aue [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumann, Stefan, Oliver Niebuhr, and Bastian Schroeter
    2016 Acoustic cues to perceived prominence levels: Evidence from German spontaneous speech. Proceedings of 8th Speech Prosody Conference, ed. byJon Barnes, Alejna Brugos, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel and Nanette Veilleux, 711–715. Baixas, France: ISCA Archive. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016‑146
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-146 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink
    2015Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. RetrievedNovember 20, 2015, fromwww.praat.org
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chafe, Wallace
    1994Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Kai-Yun, Laurent Prévot, Roxane Bertrand, Béatrice Priego-Valverde, and Philippe Blache
    2012 Toward a Mandarin-French corpus of interactional data. Proceedings of the 16th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogues, ed. bySarah Brown-Schmidt, Jonathan Ginzburg and Staffan Larsson, 147–148. Paris, France: SEMDIAL.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Kai-Yun, Wei-Te Fang, and Chiu-Yu Tseng
    2015 Information content, weighting and distribution in continuous speech prosody–A cross-genre comparison. Paper presented at the2015 International Conference Oriental COCOSDA, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chomsky, Noam
    1986Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Clark, Andy
    2013 Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences36.3:181–204. 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477 [Google Scholar]
  12. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    1986An Introduction to English Prosody. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. De Ruiter, Jan-Peter, Holger Mitterer, and Nick J. Enfield
    2006 Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language82.3:515–535. 10.1353/lan.2006.0130
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0130 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dilley, Laura
    2016 Rhythm, context effects, and prediction. Paper presented at the8th Speech Prosody Conference (SP 2016), Boston University, Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Falk, Simone
    2014 On the notion of salience in spoken discourse–Prominence cues shaping discourse structure and comprehension. TIPA: Travaux Interdisciplinaires Sur La Parole et Le Langage30:1–23. 10.4000/tipa.1303
    https://doi.org/10.4000/tipa.1303 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1996 Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. Interaction and Grammar, ed. byElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Sandra A. Thompson, 135–184. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodwin, Charles
    1996 Transparent vision. Interaction and Grammar, ed. byElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Sandra A. Thompson, 370–404. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008 [Google Scholar]
  18. Haegeman, Lillian
    1994Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
    1967 Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 1. Journal of Linguistics3.1:37–81. 10.1017/S0022226700012949
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012949 [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang, Shuanfan
    2013Chinese Grammar at Work. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scld.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.1 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jefferson, Gail
    1973 A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica9.1:47–96. 10.1515/semi.1973.9.1.47
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.9.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kohler, Klaus. J.
    1997 Modelling prosody in spontaneous speech. Computing Prosody: Computational Models for Processing Spontaneous Speech, ed. bySagisaka Yoshinori, Nick Campbell and Norio Higuchi, 187–210. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑2258‑3_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2258-3_13 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lerner, Gene. H.
    1996 On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. Interaction and Grammar, ed. byElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Sandra A. Thompson. 238–271. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lieberman, Philip
    1967Intonation, Perception, and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Julia Bell Hirschberg
    1990 The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. Intentions in Communication, ed. byPhilip R. Cohen, Jerry L. Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack, 271–311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel. A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50.4:696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  28. Silverman, Kim, Mary Beckman, John Pitrelli, Mari Ostendorf, Colin Wightman, Patti Price, Janet Pierrehumbert and Julia Hirschberg
    1992 ToBI: A standard for labeling English prosody. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 92), ed. byJohn J. Ohala, Terrance M. Nearey, Bruce L. Derwing, Megan M. Hodge and Grace Weibe, 867–870. Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Su, Chao-yu, and Chiu-yu Tseng
    2015 Melody of Mandarin L2 English⎯When L1 transfer and L2 planning come together. Paper presented at the2015 International Conference Oriental COCOSDA, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2017 How prosodic cues could lead to information center in speech⎯An alternative to ASR. Paper presented at the2017 International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments (Oriental COCOSDA), Seoul National University, Seoul. 10.1109/ICSDA.2017.8384443
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSDA.2017.8384443 [Google Scholar]
  31. Tseng, Chiu-yu
    2010 An F0 analysis of discourse construction and global information in realized narrative prosody. Language and Linguistics11.2:183–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2013 Output prosody⎯How information highlights are piggybacked by discourse structure. Zhongguo Yuyin Xuebao4:109–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tseng, Chiu-yu, and Chao-yu Su
    2012 Information allocation and prosodic expressiveness in continuous speech: A Mandarin cross genre analysis. Paper presented at the8th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP 2012), Innocentre, Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2014 L2 discourse and information planning and their prosodic implications. Paper presented at the2014 International Conference Oriental COCOSDA. Cape Panwa Hotel, Phuket.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tseng, Chiu-yu, Lin-shan Lee, and Zhao-yu Su
    2008 Spontaneous Mandarin speech prosody-the NTU DSP lecture corpus. Paper presented at the2008 International Conference Oriental COCOSDA. National Institute of Communication Technology, Kyoto.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tseng, Chiu-yu, Shao-huang Pin, Yehlin Lee, Hsin-min Wang, and Yong-cheng Chen
    2005 Fluent speech prosody: Framework and modelling. Speech Communication46.3–4:284–309. 10.1016/j.specom.2005.03.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.03.015 [Google Scholar]
  37. Tseng, Chiu-yu, Yun-Ching Cheng, Wei-Shan Lee, and Feng-Lan Huang
    2003 Collecting Mandarin speech databases for prosody investigation. Paper presented at theOriental-COCOSDA Workshop 2003. Sijori Resort Sentosa, Sentosa.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Tseng, Chiu-yu, and Zhao-yu Su
    2008 Discourse prosody and context–Global F0 and tempo modulations. Paper presented at the9th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2008). Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre (BCEC), Brisbane. 10.21437/Interspeech.2008‑361
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2008-361 [Google Scholar]
  39. Tseng, Chiu-yu, Zhao-yu Su, and Chi-feng Huang
    2011 Prosodic highlights in Mandarin continuous speech⎯Cross-genre attributes and implications. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2011), ed. byPiero Cosi, Renato De Mori, Giuseppe Di Fabbrizio and Roberto Pieraccini, 1381–1384. Baixas, France: ISCA Archive.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error