1887
Volume 47, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1810-7478
  • E-ISSN: 2589-5230

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to examine the subtypes of directives and their realization patterns in Taiwanese Southern Min (TSM). The data were drawn from a play script corpus published in the 20th century. Nine directive subtypes were identified: , and . The realization patterns were analyzed in terms of the main components in the directives: alerter, discourse marker, politeness marker, subject, modal expression, verb phrase, and utterance final particle. The analysis reveals a number of features: (1) Alerters mainly take the form of an address term; (2) Utterance-initial discourse markers are mainly realized by ‘now’; (3) The subject is either hearer-dominated or speaker- and hearer-dominated, with the latter expressing solidarity in casual situations; (4) the politeness marker tends to take an overt subject; (5) The modal verb accounts for the majority of subtypes; (6) The dominant verb types include dynamic, stative, uttering, and ingesting verbs; (7) Complex verb constructions mainly include directional verbs, disposal markers, and benefactive verbs; (8) Directional verbs are pervasive across all directives. A metaphorical transfer is operative in the use of directional verbs. Those marking an action toward the speaker (e.g., ‘come’) are strongly associated with a positive attitude, while those expressing movement away from the speaker (e.g., ‘go’) are highly connected to an adversative mood. The omnipresence of [ V] suggests that it has been conventionalized as a default bundle to express politeness.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00030.cha
2021-11-17
2021-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/consl.00030.cha.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00030.cha&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Austin, John L.
    1962How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
    1989Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan L.
    1995 An introductory essay. Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. byJoan L. Bybee and Suzanne Fleischman, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang, Miao-Hsia
    2015 Two counter-expectation markers in Chinese. Metaphor and Metonymy across Time and Cultures: Perspectives on the Sociohistorical Linguistics of Figurative Language. Cognitive Linguistics Research Series, ed. byJavier E. Díaz-Vera, 141–170. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110335453.141
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335453.141 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang, Miao-Hsia, and Shu-kai Hsieh
    2017 A corpus-based study of the recurrent lexical bundle ka li kong ‘let (me) tell you’ in Taiwanese Southern Min conversations. Chinese Language and Discourse8.2:174–211. 10.1075/cld.17004.cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.17004.cha [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Mei-Ying, and Chia-Ti Tseng
    2015 A comparative study on the request strategies of college students and the semantic formulas of Mandarin textbooks in Taiwan. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching12.3:125–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Xiu
    (ed.) 1991Taiwanhua Dacidian [A Dictionary of Taiwanese]. Taipei: Yuan-Liou Publishing Co., Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Yupin
    2010 Mandarin-Speaking Children’s Politeness in Requests. Doctoral dissertation, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
  11. Geng, Chunling
    2015 Comparison between Chinese address terms and English address terms. Higher Education of Social Science9.4:1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics14.2:237–257. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang, Han-Chun
    2015 Causative and interpersonal constructions: Manifestations of kang7 in Modern Taiwanese Southern Min. Journal of Taiwanese Languages and Literature10.2:47–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jang, Hee Jin
    2014 The analysis of Chinese request strategies and pedagogical applications in Chinese TV dramas. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kärkkainen, Elise
    2003Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.115
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.115 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kohnen, Thomas
    2008 Tracing directives through text and time: Towards a methodology of a corpus-based diachronic speech-act analysis. Speech Acts in the History of English, ed. byAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 295–310. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.16koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.16koh [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee, Hui-Chi
    2009Ka…hoo constructions in Taiwanese Southern Min. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics7.2:25–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, Kai-fat
    1976 Polysyllabicity in the modern Chinese verb: An attempt to quantify a linguistic drift. Journal of Chinese Linguistics4.1:24–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee Chen, Lily
    1997 Metaphorical extension: The phenonmenon of lâi來/khì去 ‘come/go’ in Taiwanese. Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica: Chinese Languages and Linguistics, vol. III, ed. byFeng-fu Tao and H. Samuel Wang, 103–137. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee-Wong, Song Mei
    1994 Imperatives in requests: Direct or impolite–Observations from Chinese. Pragmatics4.4:491–515. 10.1075/prag.4.4.01lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.4.4.01lee [Google Scholar]
  21. Levin, Beth
    1993English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago, IL & London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, Ing Cherry
    1999Utterance-Final Particles in Taiwanese: A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin, Yuh-Huey
    2009 Query preparatory modals: Cross-linguistic and cross-situational variations in request modification. Journal of Pragmatics41.8:1636–1656. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  24. McCarthy, Michael
    1991Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ni, D. Fu-yeh
    1996 Discourse functions of Taiwanese adverbs ma, a, and koh. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nuyts, Jan, Pieter Byloo, and Janneke Diepeveen
    2010 On deontic modality, directivity, and mood: The case of Dutch mogen and moeten. Journal of Pragmatics42.1:16–34. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  27. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Linda L. Thornburg
    1998 A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics30.6:755–769. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00028‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00028-9 [Google Scholar]
  28. 1999 The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian. Metonymy in Language and Thought, ed. byKlaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden, 333–357. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.19pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.19pan [Google Scholar]
  29. (ed.) 2003 Introduction: On the nature of conceptual metonymy. Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, 1–20. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Jonh Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.113.03pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.03pan [Google Scholar]
  30. Pérez Hernández, Lorena, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza
    2002 Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics34.3:259–284. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)80002‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)80002-9 [Google Scholar]
  31. Rue, Yong-Ju, and Grace Qiao Zhang
    2008Request Strategies: A Comparative Study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.177
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.177 [Google Scholar]
  32. Schourup, Lawrence
    2011 The discourse marker now: A relevance-theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics43.8:2110–2129. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  33. Searle, John R.
    1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  34. 1979Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
  35. Shei, Chris
    2014Understanding the Chinese Language: A Comprehensive Linguistic Introduction. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315767222
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767222 [Google Scholar]
  36. Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries
    2003 Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8.2:209–243. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  37. Su, Xiu-mei
    1988 The Acquisition of Directives in Pre-School Children in Pragmatic and Syntactic Perspectives. MA thesis, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Takahashi, Hidemitsu
    2012A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of the English Imperative: With Special Reference to Japanese Imperatives. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.35 [Google Scholar]
  39. Taylor, John R.
    1989Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Teng, Kuan-ming
    2017 On Negative Imperatives in Taiwanese Southern Min. Doctoral dissertation, National Tsinghua University, Hsinchu.
  41. Teng, Shou-hsin
    1982 Disposal structures in Amoy. Bulletin of the Institute of the History and Philology, Academia Sinica53.2:331–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Thornburg, Linda L., and Klaus Panther
    1997 Speech act metonymies. Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. byWolf-Andreas Liebert, Gisela Redeker and Linda Waugh, 205–222. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.151.14tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.151.14tho [Google Scholar]
  43. Toolan, Michael J.
    1994 Narrative: Linguistic and structural theories. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 5, ed. byR. E. Asher and J. M. Y. Simpson, 2679–2696. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1991 English speech act verbs: A historical perspective. New Vistas in Grammar: Invariance and Variation, ed. byLinda R. Waugh and Stephen Rudy, 387–406. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.49.24clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.49.24clo [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsao, Feng-fu
    1987 A topic-comment approach to the ba construction. Journal of Chinese Linguistics54.1:1–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 1988 The function of Mandarin gei and Taiwanese hou in the double object and the passive constructions. The Structure of Taiwanese: A Modern Synthesis, ed. byRobert Liang-wei Cheng and Shuanfan Huang, 165–208. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wardhaugh, Ronald
    2006An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (5th edition). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1987English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. Marrickville, Australia: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 1991Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783112329764
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112329764 [Google Scholar]
  50. Yu, Ming-chung
    1999 Universalistic and culture-specific perspectives on variation in the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language. Pragmatics9.2:281–312. 10.1075/prag.9.2.04yu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.2.04yu [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, Yanyin
    1995 Strategies in Chinese requesting. Pragmatics of Chinese as Native and Target Language, ed. byGabriele Kasper, 23–68. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00030.cha
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error