1887
Volume 49, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1810-7478
  • E-ISSN: 2589-5230

Abstract

Abstract

Numeral classifiers are one of the most common types of nominal classification systems. Their geographical distribution worldwide is concentrated in Asia, which infers a scheme of diffusion from a linguistic innovation. This study investigates the origin of classifier systems in the Mongolic, Tungusic, and Turkic languages in the Altaic region with a phylogenetic analysis based on data from 55 languages. The Single Origin Hypothesis suggests that Sinitic is the most probable original source of classifier systems found in Asia (Her & Li 2023). Under this hypothesis, classifiers are unlikely to be an indigenous feature of the Altaic region, and indeed their phylogenetic signal turns out to be weak. We also conduct a qualitative analysis on the classifier inventory of the studied languages to assess the robustness of phylogenetic methods. The results also indicate that classifiers are most likely a borrowed feature in the Mongolic, Tungusic, and Turkic languages.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00031.her
2023-11-02
2025-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/consl.00031.her.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00031.her&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    2003 Mechanisms of change in areal diffusion: New morphology and language contact. Journal of Linguistics391:1–29. 10.1017/S0022226702001937
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226702001937 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan, Keith
    1977 Classifiers. Language53.2:285–311. 10.1353/lan.1977.0043
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0043 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allassonnière-Tang, Marc, and Michael Dunn
    2020 The evolutionary trends of grammatical gender in Indo-Aryan languages. Language Dynamics and Change11.2:211–240. 10.1163/22105832‑bja10011
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-bja10011 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alonso de la Fuente, José Andrés
    2017 From converb to classifier? On the etymology of Literary Manchu nofi. Essays in the History of Languages and Linguistics. Dedicated to Marek Stachowski on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, ed. byMichał Németh, Barbara Podolak and Mateusz Urban, 57–80. Cracow: Księgarnia Akademicka. 10.12797/9788376388618.03
    https://doi.org/10.12797/9788376388618.03 [Google Scholar]
  5. Audring, Jenny
    2016 Gender. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, ed. byM. Aronoff. Oxford: Oxford University Press. RetrievedAugust 1, 2022, from10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.43
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.43 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Shen-An, Marc Allassonnière-Tang, and One-Soon Her
    . (to appear). On the distribution and origin of sortal classifiers in Altaic languages. Journal of Chinese Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Clahsen, Harald
    2016 Contributions of linguistic typology to psycholinguistics. Linguistic Typology20.3:599–614. 10.1515/lingty‑2016‑0031
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0031 [Google Scholar]
  8. Corbett, Greville
    1991Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166119
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166119 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2013 Number of genders. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. byMatthew Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. RetrievedAugust 15, 2022, fromwals.info/chapter/30
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dryer, Matthew, and Martin Haspelmath
    (eds.) 2013The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Duojie, Dongzhi
    2005 Zangyu Anduo fangyan zhong de liangci [The classifiers in Amdo Tibetan]. Hanzangyuxi Liangci Yanjiu [Studies of classifiers in Sino-Tibetan], ed. byJinfang Li and Suhua Hu, 47–54. Beijing: Central University for Nationalities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Field, Kenneth
    1997 A Grammatical Overview of Santa Mongolian. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
  13. Fried, Robert
    2010 A Grammar of Bao’an Tu, a Mongolic Language of Northwest China. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, NY.
  14. Fritz, Susanne, and Andy Purvis
    2010 Selectivity in Mammalian extinction risk and threat types: A new measure of phylogenetic signal strength in binary traits. Conservation Biology24.4:1042–1051. 10.1111/j.1523‑1739.2010.01455.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01455.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Gil, David
    2013 Numeral classifiers. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. byMatthew Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. RetrievedAugust 15, 2022, fromwals.info/chapter/55
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Grinevald, Colette
    2000 A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. Systems of Nominal Classification, ed. byGunter Senft, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2015 Linguistics of classifiers. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. byJames Wright, 811–818. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.53003‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53003-7 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, and Martin Haspelmath
    2019Glottolog 4.1. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. RetrievedAugust 15, 2022, fromhttps://glottolog.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Her, One-Soon, Harald Hammarström, and Marc Allassonnière-Tang
    2022 Defining numeral classifiers and identifying classifier languages of the world. Linguistics Vanguard8.1:151–164. 10.1515/lingvan‑2022‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0006 [Google Scholar]
  20. Her, One-Soon, and Chen-Tien Hsieh
    2010 On the semantic distinction between classifiers and measure words in Chinese. Language and Linguistics11.3:527–550.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Her, One-Soon, and Bing-Tsiong Li
    2023 A single origin of numeral classifiers in Asia and Pacific: A hypothesis. Nominal Classification in Asia: Functional and Diachronic Perspectives, ed. byMarc Allassonnière-Tang and Marcin Kilarski, 113–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hölzl, Andreas, and Chundra Cathcart
    2019 Sortal numeral classifiers in Central Asia. Paper presented at the13th Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology, University of Pavia, Pavia. RetrievedAugust 1, 2022, fromhttps://www.academia.edu/40273362/Sortal_numeral_classifiers_in_Central_Asia
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu, Zhen-Hua
    1986Keerkeziyu Jianzhi [A Grammar Sketch of Kirghiz]. Beijing: Publishing House of Minority Nationalities.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Huelsenbeck, John, and Fredrik Ronquist
    2001 MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics171:754–755. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 [Google Scholar]
  25. Junastu
    Junastu 1981Tuzuyu Jianzhi [A Grammar Sketch of Tuzu]. Beijing: Publishing House of Minority Nationalities.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kilarski, Marcin, and Marc Allassonnière-Tang
    2021 Classifiers in morphology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, ed. byMark Aronoff, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.546
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.546 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kornfilt, Jaklin
    1997Turkish Descriptive Grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    2003Metaphors We Live by. London: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, Shulan, and Qian Zhong
    1986Xiboyu Jianzhi [A Brief Description of Xibe]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mace, Ruth, and Clare Holden
    2005 A phylogenetic approach to cultural evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution20.3:116–121. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  31. Metropolis, Nicholas, Arianna Rosenbluth, Marshall Rosenbluth, and Augusta Teller
    1953 Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics211:1087–1091. 10.1063/1.1699114
    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114 [Google Scholar]
  32. Popescu, Andrei, Katharina Huber, and Emmanuel Paradis
    2012 Ape 3.0: New tools for distance based phylogenetics and evolutionary analysis in R. Bioinformatics281:1536–1537. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts184
    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts184 [Google Scholar]
  33. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2021R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 4.1.2) [Computer Software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. RetrievedMarch 18, 2022, fromhttps://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rambaut, Andrew, Alexei Drummond, Dong Xie, Guy Baele, and Marc Suchard
    2018 Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology67.5:901–904. 10.1093/sysbio/syy032
    https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032 [Google Scholar]
  35. Revell, Liam
    2012 Phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology and Evolution3.2:217–223. 10.1111/j.2041‑210X.2011.00169.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Robbeets, Martine
    2015Diachrony and verb morphology: Japanese and the Transeurasian languages. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110399943
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110399943 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2017 The Turkic languages. The Turkic Languages21.1:3–35. 10.13173/TL/2017/1/3
    https://doi.org/10.13173/TL/2017/1/3 [Google Scholar]
  38. Robbeets, Martine & Alexander Savelyev
    2020The Oxford guide to the Transeurasian languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198804628.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Robbeets, Martine, and Remco Bouckaert
    2018 Bayesian phylolinguistics reveals the internal structure of the Transeurasian family. Journal of Language Evolution3.2:145–162. 10.1093/jole/lzy007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzy007 [Google Scholar]
  40. Robbeets, M., Bouckaert, R., Conte, M.
    2021 Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages. Nature5991, 616–621. 10.1038/s41586‑021‑04108‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04108-8 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ronquist, Fredrik, and John Huelsenbeck
    2003 MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)19.12:1572–1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schliep, Klaus
    2011 Phangorn: Phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics27.4:592–593. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706
    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706 [Google Scholar]
  43. Seifart, Frank
    2010 Nominal classification. Language and Linguistics Compass4.8:719–736. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00194.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00194.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Slater, Keith
    2003A Grammar of Mangghuer. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Soper, John
    1987 Loan Syntax in Turkic and Iranian: The Verb Systems of Tajik, Uzbek, and Qashqai. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
  46. Underhill, Robert
    1980Turkish Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. van Schaaik, Gervan
    1996Studies in Turkish Grammar Turcologica. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang, Qingfeng
    2005Manyu Yanjiu [A Study of Manchu]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00031.her
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.00031.her
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error