Word stress patterns in Dharamshala Tibetan

References

1. Alabeeky, Reem
   2021 Word stress in Qassimi Arabic: A constraint-based analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics12.11:98–119. 10.5539/ijel.v12n1p98
   https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v12n1p98 [Google Scholar]
2. Altshuler, Daniel
   2009 Quantity-insensitive iambs in Osage. International Journal of American Linguistics75.31:365–398. 10.1086/605417
   https://doi.org/10.1086/605417 [Google Scholar]
3. Baković, Eric
   2004 Unbounded stress and factorial typology. Optimality Theory in Phonology, ed. byJohn J. McCarthy, 202–214. Malden, Oxford & Carlton: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 10.1002/9780470756171.ch10
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756171.ch10 [Google Scholar]
4. Beyer, Stephan V.
   1992 The Classical Tibetan Language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink
   2010 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. RetrievedMay 29, 2022, fromhttps://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
   [Google Scholar]
6. Broselow, Ellen
   1992 Parametric variation in Arabic dialect phonology. Perspectives on Arabic linguistics IV, ed. byEllen Broselow, Mushira Eid and John J. McCarthy, 7–45. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/cilt.85.04bro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.85.04bro [Google Scholar]
7. Caplow, Nancy J.
   2017 Reconstructing stress in Proto-Tibetan: Evidence from Balti and Rebkong Amdo. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area39.21:180–221.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle
   1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dawson, Willa
   1980 Tibetan Phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Washington, D.C.
10. de Lacy, Paul
    2002 The interaction of tone and stress in Optimality Theory. Phonology19.11:1–32. 10.1017/S0952675702004220
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675702004220 [Google Scholar]
11. DeLancey, Scott
    2006a Classical Tibetan. The Sino-Tibetan Languages, ed. byGraham Thurgood and Randy John LaPolla, vol.31, 255–269. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. DeLancey, Scott
    2006b Lhasa Tibetan. The Sino-Tibetan Languages, ed. byGraham Thurgood and Randy John LaPolla, vol.31, 270–288. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Denwood, Philip
    1999 Tibetan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/loall.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.3 [Google Scholar]
14. Dodsworth, Robin
    2017 Migration and dialect contact. Annual Review of Linguistics3.11:331–346. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011516‑034108
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034108 [Google Scholar]
15. Féry, Caroline
    1998 German word stress in Optimality Theory. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics2.21:101–142. 10.1023/A:1009883701003
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009883701003 [Google Scholar]
16. Goedemans, Rob
    2010 A typology of stress patterns. A Survey of Word Accentual Patterns in the Languages of the World, ed. byHarry van der Hulst, Rob Goedemans and Ellen van Zanten, 647–668. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110198966.1.647
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198966.1.647 [Google Scholar]
17. Goedemans, Rob, and Harry van der Hulst
    2014 The separation of accent and rhythm: Evidence from StressTyp. Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues, ed. byHarry van der Hulst, 119–146. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139600408.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600408.006 [Google Scholar]
18. Gong, Xun
    2021 How many vowels are there in Lhasa Tibetan?Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area43.21:225–254.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gordon, Matthew
    2006 Syllable Weight: Phonetics, Phonology, Typology. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gordon, Matthew
    2011 Stress systems. The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. byJohn Goldsmith, Jason Riggle and Alan C. L. Yu, 141–163. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 10.1002/9781444343069.ch5
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch5 [Google Scholar]
21. Green, Jeffrey R.
    2012 The phonology of voicing and aspiration in Amdo Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area35.21:1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gussenhoven, Carlos
    2004 The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511616983
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616983 [Google Scholar]
23. Halle, Morris, and William Idsardi
    1995 General properties of stress and metrical structure. A Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. byJohn Goldsmith, 403–443. Cambridge & Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hammond, Michael
    2000 There is no lexicon!Coyote Papers101:55–77.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hartley, Lauran R.
    1996 The role of regional factors in the standardization of spoken Tibetan. The Tibet Journal21.41:30–57.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hayes, Bruce
    1995 Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Huang, Yaqian
    2019 Revisiting non-idempotency in Tibetan vowel harmony. San Diego Linguistic Papers71:2–16.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hyman, Larry M.
    1985 A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris Publications. 10.1515/9783110854794
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854794 [Google Scholar]
29. Inkelas, Sharon
    1999 Exceptional stress-attracting suffixes in Turkish: Representations versus the grammar. The Prosody-Morphology Interface, ed. byHarry van der Hulst, René Kager and Wim Zonneveld, 134–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627729.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627729.006 [Google Scholar]
30. Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester
    1995 The core-periphery structure in the lexicon and constraints on re-ranking. Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. byJill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey and Suzanne Urbanczyk, 181–209. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kager, René
    1993 Alternatives to the iambic-trochaic law. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory11.31:381–432. 10.1007/BF00993165
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993165 [Google Scholar]
32. Kager, René
    1999 Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812408 [Google Scholar]
33. Kisseberth, Charles W.
    1970 On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry1.31:291–306.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kondo, Riena
    2001 Guahibo stress: Both trochaic and iambic. International Journal of American Linguistics67.21:136–166. 10.1086/466453
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466453 [Google Scholar]
35. Ladd, Dwight Robert
    2008 Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511808814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808814 [Google Scholar]
36. Liberman, Mark, and Alan Prince
    1977 On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry8.21:249–336.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lim, Jonathan
    2018 Tonal and Intonational Phonology of Lhasa Tibetan. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
38. McCarthy, John J.
    1995 Faithfulness in prosodic morphology and phonology: Rotuman revisited. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
39. McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince
    1993 Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993, ed. byGeert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 79–153. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3712‑8_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3712-8_4 [Google Scholar]
40. McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince
    1996 Prosodic morphology 1986. Linguistics Department Faculty Publication Series, vol.131, ed. byDepartment of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 1–100. Amherst, MA: Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
41. McConnell, Fiona
    2016 Rehearsing the State: The Political Practices of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile. Chichester, UK & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118661192
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661192 [Google Scholar]
42. Meredith, Scott
    1990 Issues in the Phonology of Prominence. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
43. Milroy, Lesley
    2002 Introduction: Mobility, contact and language change—Working with contemporary speech communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics6.11:3–15. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00174
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00174 [Google Scholar]
44. Monich, Irina
    2011 Interaction of tone and intonation in Lhasa Tibetan: A working hypothesis. Paper presented at the34th Generative Linguistics in the Old World (GLOW34), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Munshi, Sadaf, and Megan J. Crowhurst
    2012 Weight sensitivity and syllable codas in Srinagar Koshur. Journal of Linguistics48.21:427–472. 10.1017/S0022226712000096
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000096 [Google Scholar]
46. Nespor, Marina, and Irene Vogel
    1986 Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht, Netherlands & Riverton, NJ: Foris Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Norbu, Dawa
    2001 Refugees from Tibet: Structural causes of successful settlements. The Tibet Journal26.21:3–25.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Pandey, Pramod
    2021 An optimality theoretic account of word stress in Hindi. Lingua2501:1–19. 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102994
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102994 [Google Scholar]
49. Pater, Joe
    1994 Against the underlying specification of an ‘exceptional’ English stress pattern. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics131:95–121.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky
    1993 Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Samuels, Jonathan
    2014 Colloquial Tibetan: The Complete Course for Beginners. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
    1980 The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry11.31:563–605.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
    1986 Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Staubs, Robert
    2014 Learning and the position of primary stress. Proceedings of the 31th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL31), ed. byRobert E. Santana-LaBarge, 428–437. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    1986 Aspects of the Phonology of Amdo Tibetan: Ndzorge Śæme Xg̳ra Dialect. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2003 Phonological profile of Zhongu: A new Tibetan dialect of Northern Sichuan. Language and Linguistics4.41:769–836.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2006 Special linguistic features of gSerpa Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area29.11:107–126.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Suzuki, Hiroyuki
    2011 Phonetic analysis of dGudzong Tibetan: The vernacular of Khams Tibetan spoken in the rGyalrong area. Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology35.41:617–653.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Suzuki, Hiroyuki
    2022 Geolinguistics in the Eastern Tibetosphere: An Introduction. Tokyo: Geolinguistic Society of Japan.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Suzuki, Hiroyuki, and Sonam Wangmo
    2017 Vocabulary of Shingnyag Tibetan: A dialect of Amdo Tibetan spoken in Lhagang, Khams Minyag. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics111:101–127.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Tournadre, Nicolas, and Sangda Dorje
    2003 Manual of Standard Tibetan: Language and Civilization. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Watters, David E.
    2002 A Grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486883
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486883 [Google Scholar]