oa Encoding complex speech acts via sentence final particles

References

1. Austin, John L.
   1962 How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bao, Houxin, Zhenhua Cui, Ruoyun Shen, and Yunji Wu
   (eds.) 1998 Changsha Fangyan Cidian [Dictionary of Changsha Dialect]. Nanjing, China: Jiangsu Education Publishing House.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Beyssade, Claire, and Jean-Marie Marandin
   2006 The speech act assignment problem revisited: Disentangling speaker’s commitment from speaker’s call on addressee. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics61:37–68.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bussmann, Hadumod
   1999 Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cinque, Guglielmo
   1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
6. Gazdar, Gerald
   1981 Speech act assignment. Elements of Discourse Understanding, ed. byAravind Joshi, Bonnie Webber and Ivan A. Sag, 64–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ginzburg, Jonathan, and Ivan A. Sag
   2000 Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Haegeman, Liliane
   2000 Remnant movement and OV order. The Derivation of VO and OV, ed. byPeter Svenonius, 69–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/la.31.04hae
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.31.04hae [Google Scholar]
9. Haegeman, Liliane
   2001 Antisymmetry and verb-final order in West Flemish. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics3.31:207–232. 10.1023/A:1011912402857
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011912402857 [Google Scholar]
10. Haegeman, Lililane, and Virginia Hill
    2013 The syntacticization of discourse. Syntax and its Limits, ed. byRaffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali and Robert Truswell, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018 [Google Scholar]
11. Heim, Johannes, Hermann Keupdjio, Zoe Wai-Man Lam, Adriana Osa-Gómez, and Martina Wiltschko
    2014 How to do things with particles. Proceedings of the 2014 Annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. byLaura Teddiman, 1–15. St. Catharines, Canada: Canadian Linguistic Association.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Heim, Johannes, Hermann Keupdjio, Zoe Wai-Man Lam, Adriana Osa-Gómez, Sonja Thoma, and Martina Wiltschko
    2016 Intonation and particles as speech act modifiers: A syntactic analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics37.21:109–129. 10.1515/scl‑2016‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/scl-2016-0005 [Google Scholar]
13. Heim, Johannes, and Martina Wiltschko
    2020 Deconstructing questions: Reanalyzing a heterogenous class of speech acts via commitment and engagement. Scandinavian Studies in Language11.11:56–82. 10.7146/sss.v11i1.121361
    https://doi.org/10.7146/sss.v11i1.121361 [Google Scholar]
14. Hinterhölzl, Roland
    2000 Licensing movement and stranding in the West Germanic OV languages. The Derivation of VO and OV, ed. byPeter Svenonius, 293–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/la.31.11hin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.31.11hin [Google Scholar]
15. Ho, Dah-an
    1987 Shengyunxui Zhong de Guannian he Fangfa [The Concept and Methods of Phonology]. Taipei: Dahan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hu, Ping
    2002 Changsha fangyan yuqici yanjiu [A study on modal words in the Changsha dialect]. Hunan Jingji Guanli Ganbu Xueyuan Xuebao13.41:108–110.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Huang, Yan
    2007 Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jung, Verena, and Angela Schrott
    2003 A question of time? Question types and speech act shifts from a historical-contrastive perspective. Meaning Through Language Contrast, vol. 21, ed. byM. Jaszczolt and Ken Turner, 345–371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.100.21jun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.100.21jun [Google Scholar]
19. Kayne, Richard Stanley
    1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Koopman, Hilda Judith, and Anna Szabolcsi
    2000 Verbal Complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7090.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7090.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
21. Lam, Zoe Wai-Man
    2014 A complex ForceP for speaker- and addressee-oriented discourse particles in Cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics35.21:61–80.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
23. Miró, Elena Castroviejo
    2008 Deconstructing exclamations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics71:41–90. 10.5565/rev/catjl.132
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.132 [Google Scholar]
24. Munaro, Nicola, and Cecilia Poletto
    2002 Ways of clausal typing. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa271:87–105.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Norman, Jerry
    1988 Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pearson, Matthew
    2000 Two types of VO languages. The Derivation of VO and OV, ed. byPeter Svenonius, 327–363. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/la.31.12pea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.31.12pea [Google Scholar]
27. Portner, Paul
    2004 The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. Proceedings from the 14th Semantics and Linguistic Theory, ed. byRobert B. Young, 235–252. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 10.3765/salt.v14i0.2907
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v14i0.2907 [Google Scholar]
28. Richards, Jack Croft, and Richard W. Schmidt
    2010 Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sadock, Jerrold M.
    1974 Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Searle, John Rogers
    1979 Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
31. Speas, Peggy, and Carol Tenny
    2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. Asymmetry in Grammar, ed. byAnna Maria di Sciullo, 315–345. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/la.57.15spe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.57.15spe [Google Scholar]
32. Tang, Sze-Wing
    2010 Xingshi Hanyu Jufaxue [Formal Chinese Syntax]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Tang, Sze-Wing
    2015 Yueyu Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on Cantonese Grammar]. Hong Kong: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Tang, Sze-Wing
    2020 Cartographic syntax of performative projections: Evidence from Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics29.11:1–30. 10.1007/s10831‑019‑09202‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-019-09202-7 [Google Scholar]
35. Wiltschko, Martina
    2014 The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139833899
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139833899 [Google Scholar]
36. Wiltschko, Martina
    2021 The Grammar of Interactional Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108693707
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108693707 [Google Scholar]
37. Wiltschko, Martina, and Johannes Heim
    2016 The syntax of confirmationals: A neo-performative analysis. Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituent, ed. byGunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann, 303–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/slcs.178.11wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.178.11wil [Google Scholar]
38. Wu, Yunji
    2005 A Synchronic and Diachronic Study of the Grammar of the Chinese Xiang Dialects. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110927481
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110927481 [Google Scholar]
39. Yang, Xiaodong, and Martina Wiltschko
    2016 The confirmational marker ha in Northern Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics1041:67–82. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.004 [Google Scholar]
40. Zhang, Ling, and Tang Sze Wing
    2016 Xianggang yueyu jumo zhuci shengdiao yu judiao guanxi de chutan [Preliminary studies on tones of sentence-final particles and intonation in Cantonese]. Yunlü Yanjiu [Prosodic Studies], vol.11, ed. byShengli Feng, 113–127. Beijing: Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Zheng, Tingting, and Haoping Yue
    2014 Hunan fangyan jumo yuqici yanjiu zongshu [An overview on studies of sentence final modal particles in Hunan dialects]. Hubei Guangbo Dianshi Daxue Xuebao34.81:77–78.
    [Google Scholar]