Vietnamese transitive cognate objects revisited

References

1. Aarts, Bas
   2013 English Syntax and Argumentation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑06335‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06335-9 [Google Scholar]
2. Adger, David
   2012 Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Yurievna
   2000 Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bowers, John
   2002 Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry33.21:183–224. 10.1162/002438902317406696
   https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902317406696 [Google Scholar]
5. Burzio, Luigi
   1986 Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑4522‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7 [Google Scholar]
6. Carnie, Andrew
   2013 Syntax: A Generative Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Casilda, Garcia de la
   2016 The argument-structure configuration of English middle and related structures. Atypical Predicate-argument Relations, ed. byThierry Ruchot and Pascale Van Praet, 115–130. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chomsky, Noam
   1993 Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110884166
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884166 [Google Scholar]
9. Clark, Marybeth
   1992 Conjunction as topicalizer in Vietnamese. Mon-Khmer Studies201:91–110.
   [Google Scholar]
10. de Swart, Peter
    2007 Cross-linguistic Variation in Object Marking. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
11. Deng, Dun
    2013 The Syntax and Semantics of Event Quantifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
12. Duffield, Nigel
    1999 Final modals, adverbs and antisymmetry in Vietnamese. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique27.21:91–129. 10.7202/603177ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/603177ar [Google Scholar]
13. Jones, Michael Allan
    1988 Cognate objects and the case filter. Journal of Linguistics24.11:89–110. 10.1017/S0022226700011579
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011579 [Google Scholar]
14. Kearns, Kate
    2011 Semantics. New York: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑35609‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35609-2 [Google Scholar]
15. Kuno, Susumu, and Ken-ichi Takami
    2004 Functional Constraints in Grammar: On the Unergative-unaccusative Distinction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/cal.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.1 [Google Scholar]
16. Larson, Richard
    1988 On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry19.31:335–391.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Larson, Richard
    2010 Grammar as Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Levin, Beth
    1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Levin, Beth
    2015 Verb classes within and across languages. Case Studies from Austronesia, the Pacific, the Americas, and Theoretical Outlook, ed. byBernard Comrie and Andrej Malchukov, 1627–1670. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110429343‑019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429343-019 [Google Scholar]
20. Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav
    1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav
    2005 Argument Realization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479 [Google Scholar]
22. Löbner, Sebastian
    2013 Understanding Semantics. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203528334
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203528334 [Google Scholar]
23. Macfarland, Talke
    1995 Cognate Objects and the Argument/Adjunct Distinction in English. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
24. Massam, Diane
    1990 Cognate objects as thematic objects. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics35.21:161–190. 10.1017/S0008413100013566
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100013566 [Google Scholar]
25. Mittwoch, Anita, Rodney Huddleston, and Peter Collins
    2002 The clause: Adjuncts. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, ed. byRodney Huddleston and Geoffrey Pullum, 663–784. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530.009 [Google Scholar]
26. Miyamoto, Tadao
    1999 The Light Verb Construction in Japanese: The Role of the Verbal Noun. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Moltmann, Fredericke
    1989 Nominal and clausal event predicates. Proceedings from the 25th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. byBradley Music, Caroline Wiltshire and Randolph Graczyk, 300–314. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Nakajima, Heizo
    2006 Adverbial cognate objects. Linguistic Inquiry37.41:674–684. 10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.674
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.674 [Google Scholar]
29. Næss, Åshild
    2007 Prototypical Transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/tsl.72
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.72 [Google Scholar]
30. Nguyen, Dinh Hoa
    1957 Classifiers in Vietnamese. Word: Journal of the International Linguistic Association13.11:124–152.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Nguyen, Dinh Hoa
    1997 Vietnamese: Tieng Viet Khong Son Phan [Vietnamese without Veneer]. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/loall.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.9 [Google Scholar]
32. Nguyen, Hung Tuong
    2013 The Vietnamese noun phrases. Linguistics of Vietnamese — An International Survey, ed. byDaniel Hole and Elisabeth Löbel, 57–87. Berlin & Cologne: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nguyen, Huu Dat
    2000 Tieng Viet Thuc Hanh [Vietnamese Applied Linguistics]. Ha Noi, Vietnam: NXB Vanhoa Thongtin.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Nguyen, Phu Phong
    2004 Verbal classifiers in Vietnamese. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, ed. bySomsonge Burusphat, 575–582. Tempe, AZ: Program for Southeast Asian Studies, Arizona State University.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pereltsvaig, Asya
    1999 Two classes of cognate objects. Proceedings of the 17th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. byKimary Shahin, Susan Blake and Eun-Sook Kim, 537–551. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pham, Hoa
    1999 Cognate objects in Vietnamese transitive verbs. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics171:227–246.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Primus, Beatrice
    2016 Participant roles. The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, ed. byNick Riemer, 403–418. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ramchand, Gillian
    2013 Argument structure and argument structure alternations. The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, ed. byMarcel den Dikken, 265–321. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511804571.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804571.013 [Google Scholar]
39. Sailer, Manfred
    2010 The family of English cognate object constructions. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, ed. byStefan Muller, 191–211. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications. 10.21248/hpsg.2010.11
    https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2010.11 [Google Scholar]
40. Schwarzschild, Roger
    2006 The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax9.11:67–110. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2006.00083.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2006.00083.x [Google Scholar]
41. Simpson, Andrew, and Binh Ngo
    2018 Classifier syntax in Vietnamese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics27.31:211–246. 10.1007/s10831‑018‑9181‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-018-9181-5 [Google Scholar]
42. Tallerman, Maggie
    2011 Understanding Syntax. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Thompson, Laurence Cassius
    1965 A Vietnamese Grammar. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Tran, Jennie
    2011 The Acquisition of Vietnamese Classifiers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI.
45. Tran, Thanh Hai
    2019 A corpus-based study of classifiers in Vietnamese. Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. byNicole Rosen and Anne-José Villeneuve. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Trinh, Tue
    2019 The Edginess of Silence: A Study on Chain Linearization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110637465
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110637465 [Google Scholar]
47. Vittrant, Alice, and Marc Tang
    2021 Classifiers in Southeast Asian languages. The Languages and Linguistics of Mainland Southeast Asia: A Comprehensive Guide, ed. byPaul Sidwell and Mathias Jenny, 733–772. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110558142‑031
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110558142-031 [Google Scholar]
48. Wierzbicka, Anna
    2002 Semantic primes and linguistic typology. Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings, vol.11 & vol.21, ed. byCliff Goddard and Anna Wierzbicka, 257–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/slcs.61.10wie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.61.10wie [Google Scholar]
49. Zhang, Niina Ning
    2013 Classifier Structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110304992
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110304992 [Google Scholar]
50. Zhang, Niina Ning
    2017 The syntax of event internal and event external verbal classifiers. Studia Linguistica71.31:1–35. 10.1111/stul.12073
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12073 [Google Scholar]