1887
Volume 48, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1810-7478
  • E-ISSN: 2589-5230
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In modern Chinese, the adverb is regarded as an adjective-adjective compound, with morphemes ‘late’ and ‘early’ as extreme poles in a gradable temporality. The formation of as an antonymous compound has not received much attention from a diachronic construction grammar perspective. This study reports on the historical change of as evidence showing the interplay of antonymous compounds and constructionalization in modern Chinese. Based on corpus analysis, I found that the formation of as a lexical construction inherits from previous changes but emerges instantaneously in Pre-Modern Chinese, where its form has been condensed and its meaning has been bleached to indicate subjectivity. Three arguments shed light on the model of constructionalization: (1) constructionalization at the compound level can be associated with three motivations: subjectivity, frequency, and metaphor; and (2) the operation of constructionalization is at work not only at the sentential and phrasal level but also at the morphological level of compound word formation in Chinese; (3) rhetoric as an output of language use plays a part in the development of constructionalization in relation to antonymous compounds.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/consl.21012.lu
2022-05-02
2022-05-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
    2007 Chinese: A language of compound words. Selected Proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse, ed. byFabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé, Nabil Hathout, 79–90. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow, Michael, and Suzanne Kemmer
    (eds.) 2000Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea
    (eds.) 2015Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, Laurie
    2003Introducing Linguistic Morphology. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bisang, Walter
    2010 Grammaticalization in Chinese: A construction-based account. Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization, ed. byElizabeth Closs Traugott and Graeme Trousdale, 245–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.90.13bis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.13bis [Google Scholar]
  6. Booij, Geert
    2010a Construction morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass4.7: 543–555.   10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00213.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00213.x [Google Scholar]
  7. 2010bConstruction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brinton, Laurel J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2005Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615962
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615962 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bybee, Joan L.
    2003 Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. byBrian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2006 From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language82.4: 711–733.   10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bybee, Joan L., and James L. McClelland
    2005 Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. The Linguistic Review22.2–4:381–410.   10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2‑4.381
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.381 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bybee, Joan L., and Paul Hopper
    (eds.) 2001Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bybee, Joan L., and Sandra Thompson
    1997 Three frequency effects in syntax. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. byMatthew L. Juge and Jeri L. Moxley, 378–388. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.   10.3765/bls.v23i1.1293
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v23i1.1293 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ceccagno, Antonella, and Bianca Basciano
    2007 Compound headedness in Chinese: An analysis of neologisms. Morphology17.2:207–231.   10.1007/s11525‑008‑9119‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-008-9119-0 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, Ping
    1999Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164375
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164375 [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, Qingrong, Jingjing Zhang, Xiaodong Xu, Christoph Scheepers, Yiming Yang, and Michael K. Tanenhaus
    2016 Prosodic expectations in silent reading: ERP evidence from rhyme scheme and semantic congruence in classic Chinese poems. Cognition154:11–21. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, Weiwu
    1989 Lun xianqin fanyi fuhe ci de chansheng jiqi pianyi xianxiang [On the emergence of Chinese antonymous compounds with the meaning inclined to one word]. Guhanyu Yanjiu1:47–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Coussé, Evie, Peter Andersson, and Joel Olofsson
    2018 Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar: Opportunities, Challenges and Potential Incompatibilities. Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar, ed. byEvie Coussé, Peter Andersson and Joel Olofsson, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.21.c1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c1 [Google Scholar]
  20. Croft, William
    2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. De Haan, Ferdinand
    2001 The relation between modality and evidentiality. Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen (Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 9) [Modality and Modal Verbs in German (Linguistic Reports, Special Issue 9)], ed. byReimar Muller and Marga Reis, 201–216. Hamburg, Germany: Helmut Buske Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dictionary Department, Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
    Dictionary Department, Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences 2005Xiandai Hanyu Cidian [The Contemporary Chinese Dictionary] (5th edition). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Diessel, Holger, and Martin Hilpert
    2016 Frequency effects in grammar. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, ed. byMark Aronoff. RetrievedJuly 15, 2020, from   10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.120
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.120 [Google Scholar]
  24. Downer, Gordon B., and Angus Charles Graham
    1963 Tone patterns in Chinese poetry. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London26.1:145–148.   10.1017/S0041977X00074322
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00074322 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fang, Yixin, and Dan Zeng
    2007 Fanyi fuhe ci haodai de yufahua ji zhuguanhua [The grammaticalization and subjectivization of the antonymous compound haodai]. Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Renwen sheke ban)37.1:64–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fried, Mirjam
    2009 Construction grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames1.2:261–290.   10.1075/cf.1.2.04fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.1.2.04fri [Google Scholar]
  27. Givón, Talmy
    1991 Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in language15.1:85–114. 10.1075/sl.15.1.04giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.15.1.04giv [Google Scholar]
  28. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Goldberg, Adele E., and Ray Jackendoff
    2004 The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language80.3:532–568.   10.1353/lan.2004.0129
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0129 [Google Scholar]
  31. Harris, Alice C., and Lyle Campbell
    1995Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620553
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  32. Haspelmath, Martin
    2007 Coordination. Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Complex Constructions, vol.2, ed. byTimothy Shopen, 1–51. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Heine, Bernd
    2003 Grammaticalization. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. byBrian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 575–601. Malden, MA: Blackwell.   10.1002/9780470756393.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch18 [Google Scholar]
  34. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer
    1991Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hilpert, Martin
    2007 Germanic Future Constructions: A Usage-based Approach to Grammaticalization. Doctoral dissertation, Rice University, Houston.
  36. 2018 Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar, ed. byEvie Coussé, Peter Andersson and Joel Olofsson, 21–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   10.1075/cal.21.c2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c2 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hopper, Paul J.
    1991 On some principles of grammaticization. Approaches to Grammaticalization: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues, vol.1, ed. byElizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  38. Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  39. Huang, Borong, and Xudong Liao
    2007Xiandai Hanyu [Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hüning, Matthias, and Geert Booij
    2014 From compounding to derivation the emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization”. Folia linguistica48.2:579–604.   10.1515/flin.2014.019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.019 [Google Scholar]
  41. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo, and Xinjia Peng
    2015 The emergence of disjunction: A history of constructionalization in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics27.1:101–136.   10.1515/cog‑2015‑0073
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0073 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kay, Paul, and Charles J. Fillmore
    1999 Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s X doing Y construction. Language75:1–33.   10.2307/417472
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417472 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lang, Yong
    2008 Motifs in the formation of antonymous compounds in Chinese. Southwest Journal of Linguistics27.2:43–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2011 Grammaticalization and cognitive grammar. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, ed. byHeiko Narrog and Bernd Heine, 79–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lehmann, Christian
    1985 Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile20.3:303–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1989Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar, Vol.3. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Li, Hong
    1999 Fuci fanzheng de yuyi yuyong fenxi [The semantic and pragmatic analysis of adverb fan-zheng in Chinese]. Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu4:118–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lightfoot, Douglas
    2011 Grammaticalization and lexicalization. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, ed. byHeiko Narrog and Bernd Heine, 438–449. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lin, T.-H. Jonah
    2012 Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics48.1:151–186.   10.1017/S0022226711000272
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000272 [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu, Dawei
    2010 Cong yufa goushi dao xiuci goushi (shang) [From grammatical construction to rhetorical construction (part I)]. Dangdai Xiuci Xue159.3:7–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Matlock, Teenie
    1989 Metaphor and the grammaticalization of evidentials. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. byKira Hall, Micheal Meacham and Richard Shapiro, 215–225. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.   10.3765/bls.v15i0.1751
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v15i0.1751 [Google Scholar]
  53. Narrog, Heiko
    2012Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Noël, Dirk
    2007 Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of language14.2:177–202.   10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe [Google Scholar]
  55. Nuyts, Jan
    2001Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
  56. Ogawa, Yoshiki, Keiyu Niikuni, and Yuichi Wada
    2020 Empty nominalization over antonymous juxtaposition/coordination and the emergence of a new syntactic construction. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung4.2:13–35.   10.3726/zwjw.2020.02.02
    https://doi.org/10.3726/zwjw.2020.02.02 [Google Scholar]
  57. Packard, Jerome L.
    2000The Morphology of Chinese. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486821
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486821 [Google Scholar]
  58. Palmer, Frank R.
    1990Modality and the English Modals (2nd edition). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Paris, Marie-Claude, and Marie-Thérèse Vinet
    2010 Approximative zuo-you ‘around, about’ in Chinese. Language and Linguistics11.4:767–801.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Peng, Dingqiu
    1960Quan Tang Shi [Collected Tang Poems]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Scalise, Sergio, Antonio Fábregas, and Francesca Forza
    2009 Exocentricity in compounding. Gengo kenkyū135:49–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Shimamura, Reiko
    1986 Lexicalization of syntactic phrases. English Linguistics3:20–37.   10.9793/elsj1984.3.20
    https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.3.20 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tan, Daren
    1989 Lue lun fanyi xiangcheng ci [On antonymous compounds in Chinese]. Yuwen Yanjiu1:27–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1995 Subjectification in grammaticalization. Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, ed. byDieter Stein and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003 [Google Scholar]
  65. 2008 Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. Variation, Selection, Development, ed. byRegine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger and Tonjes Veenstra, 219–250. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. 2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. byKristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens, 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  67. 2015 Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. Diachronic Construction Grammar, ed. byJóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea, 51–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   10.1075/cal.18.02tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.02tra [Google Scholar]
  68. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Graeme Trousdale
    2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes (1st edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2014 Contentful constructionalization. Journal of Historical Linguistics4.2:256–283.   10.1075/jhl.4.2.04tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.4.2.04tra [Google Scholar]
  70. Trousdale, Graeme
    2008 Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in the history of English. Constructional Approaches to English Grammar, ed. byGraeme Trousdale and Nikolas Gisborne, 33–70. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.   10.1515/9783110199178.1.33
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199178.1.33 [Google Scholar]
  71. Vickers, Brian
    1989Classical Rhetoric in English Poetry: With a New Preface and Annotated Bibliography. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Wang, Li, Linxiang Cen, and Tao Lin
    2005Gu Hanyu Changyong Zi Zidian [A Dictionary of Common Characters in Classical Chinese] (4th edition). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Xing, Fuyi
    1999 Shuo xiongdi he dixiong [On the difference between xiong-di and di-xiong]. Fangyan4:241–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Yu, Pauline
    1994 The Chinese Poetic Canon and its Boundaries. Boundaries in China, ed. byJohn Hay, 105–123. London: Reaktion Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhan, Fangqiong
    2017 The constructionalization of a set of connectives in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics45.1:104–144. 10.1353/jcl.2017.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2017.0003 [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhang, Jinzhu
    2013 Internal semantic structure and conceptual hierarchy of antonymous compounds in modern Chinese. Chinese Lexical Semantics (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8229), ed. byPengyuan Liu and Qi Su, 181–190. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.   10.1007/978‑3‑642‑45185‑0_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45185-0_20 [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhang, Jinzhu, and Shan Xiao
    2015 The characteristics and the whole conversion analysis of quantitative antonymous compounds. Chinese Lexical Semantics (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9332), ed. byQin Lu and Helena Hong Gao, 380–391. Cham, CH: Springer.   10.1007/978‑3‑319‑27194‑1_38
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27194-1_38 [Google Scholar]
  78. Zhou, Xiaolin, William Marslen-Wilson, Marcus Taft, and Hua Shu
    1999 Morphology, orthography and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14.5–6:525–565.   10.1080/016909699386185
    https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386185 [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhou, Yihan
    2015 A Morphological Study of the Antonymous Compounds in Chinese: How the Word Class Changes and Why. MA thesis, Seton Hall University, New Jersey.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhu, Dexi
    1982Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on Grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/consl.21012.lu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.21012.lu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error