1887
Volume 49, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1810-7478
  • E-ISSN: 2589-5230
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This work aims to investigate the morphosyntactic properties of in Siwkolan Amis and to defend a lexical split of , one being a lexical category with argument structure and the other a functional category merging to Voice0. I argue that the functional cannot be analyzed as a quotative verb or a -inflected verb as proposed in the literature, due to novel findings that (a) is permitted in patient, instrumental and locative voice constructions, (b) represses the presence of voice affixes, (c) must stand immediately adjacent to the lexical verb and (d) encodes the non-inferential evidentiality. I follow Cinque’s (2004) functional approach to restructuring predicates by treating as a functional category of Voice0 and Shih & Lin’s (2011) voice Agree system where voice is a reflex of thematic relations. This analysis fares well with Wu’s (20062007) proposed system of undergoer voice in Amis which subsumes patient, instrument and locative voice in general. Moreover, the [θ] feature on Voice0 is spelt out as surfacing as a bound affix attached to the raised lexical verb from 0. Several issues involved in dealing with the Amis voice system and implications for the evidential systems in Formosan languages are also discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/consl.22049.jhe
2023-11-02
2024-06-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Yurievna
    2005Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2007 Information source and evidentiality: What can we conclude?Rivista di Linguistica19.1:209–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2014 The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. The Grammar of Knowledge: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, ed. byAlexandra Yurievna Aikhenvald and Robert Malcolm Ward Dixon, 1–51. New York: Oxford Press University. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aldridge, Edith
    2004 Ergativity and Word Order in Austronesian Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca.
  5. Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, and Henrison Hsieh
    2021 Causes and expectations: On the interpretation of the Tagalog Ability/Involuntary Action form. Journal of Semantics38.3:441–472. 10.1093/jos/ffab008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffab008 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, Mark
    1985 The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry161:373–415.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Botne, Robert
    1995 The pronominal origin of an evidential. Diachronica12.2:201–221. 10.1075/dia.12.2.03bot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.12.2.03bot [Google Scholar]
  8. Bril, Isabelle
    2016 Information structure in Northern Amis: A morphosyntactic analysis. Oceanic Linguistics55.2:449–479. 10.1353/ol.2016.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2016.0021 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, Anna Hsiou-chuan
    2006 A Reference Grammar of Paiwan. Doctoral dissertation, The Australian National University, Canberra.
  10. 2012 Evidentials in Paiwan. Tajen Journal401:115–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang, Henry Yungli
    2006 The guest playing host: Modifiers as matrix verbs in Kavalan. Clause Structure and Adjuncts in Austronesian Languages, ed. byHans-Martin Gärtner, Paul Law and Joachim Sabel, 43–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110922974.43
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110922974.43 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2009 Adverbial verbs and adverbial compounds in Tsou. Oceanic Linguistics48.2:339–376.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, Sihwei
    2014 The syntactic categories of adverbials in Atayal. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics381:1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, Yi-Ting
    2008 A Minimalist Approach to Amis Structure and Complementation. Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.
  15. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2004 “Restructuring” and functional structure. Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol.31, ed. byAdriana Belletti, 132–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. De Haan, Ferdinand
    2005 Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, ed. byZygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges and David S. Rood, 379–397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.72.18haa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.72.18haa [Google Scholar]
  18. Felser, Claudia
    1998 Perception and control: A minimalist analysis of English direct perception complements. Journal of Linguistics341:351–385. 10.1017/S0022226798007075
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226798007075 [Google Scholar]
  19. Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley
    2005 Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian & English. Aspectual Inquiries, ed. byPaula Kempchinsky and Roumyana Slabakova, 95–120. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3033‑9_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3033-9_5 [Google Scholar]
  20. Haegeman, Liliane
    2003 Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language18.4:317–339. 10.1111/1468‑0017.00230
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00230 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2006 Clitic climbing and the dual status of sembrare. Linguistic Inquiry37.3:484–510. 10.1162/ling.2006.37.3.484
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.3.484 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2011 Evidential mood, restructuring, and the distribution of functional sembrare. Mapping the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol.51, ed. byPaola, Benincà and Nicola Munaro, 297–326. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740376.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740376.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Holmer, Arthur
    2010 Seediq adverbial verbs: A review of the evidence. Austronesian and Theoretical Linguistics, ed. byRaphael Mercado, Eric Potsdam and Lisa Travis, 163–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/la.167.11hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.167.11hol [Google Scholar]
  24. 2012 Evidence from Formosan for a unified theory of adverb ordering. Lingua122.8:902–921. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hsiao, Yi-ling
    2004 Adverbials in Squliq Atayal. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hsieh, Fuhui
    2022 On the semantics of SAY verbs in Formosan languages. Journal of Taiwanese Languages and Literature17.1:47–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jheng, Wei-Cherng Sam
    2018 Some notes on the morphosyntax of adverbials in Thao. Presented at the2018 National Conference on Linguistics (2018 NCL), National United University, Miaoli.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2022a The syntax of nominal modification and complex noun phrases in Siwkolan Amis. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics48.1:70–113. 10.1075/consl.21014.jhe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.21014.jhe [Google Scholar]
  29. 2022b The syntax of heavy NP shift in Siwkolan Amis and its implications for A’-extraction. Poster presented at the45th Generative Linguistics in the Old World (GLOW 45), Queen Mary University of London, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kayne, Richard
    1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuo, Cheng-Chuen Jonathan
    2015 The argument structure of Amis experiencer verbs: Another look at the ma- morphology. The Proceedings of the 21st Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, ed. byAmber Camp, Yuko Otsuka, Claire Stabile and Nozomi Tanaka, 127–148. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Chao-Lin
    2007 Adverbial verbs and argument attraction in Puyuma. Nanzan Linguistics: Special Issue3.1:165–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, Lilian Li-ying
    2017 Verb-adjacent clitic climbing and restructuring in Isbukun Bunun. Oceanic Linguistics56.1:1–21. 10.1353/ol.2017.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2017.0000 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2018 A Grammar of Isbukun Bunun. Doctoral dissertation. National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.
  35. Lin, Dong-yi
    2014 A cartographic approach to adverbials in Kavalan: Adverbial verbs and restructuring. Paper presented at2014 Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, University of Oxford, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu, Dorinda Tsai-hsiu
    1999 Cleft Constructions in Amis. MA thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2011 Complementation in Three Formosan Languages – Amis, Mayrinax Atayal and Tsou. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu.
  38. Liu, Emma En-hsin
    2003 Conjunction and Modification in Amis. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Oiwa, Mayumi
    2014 Adverbial verb constructions in Truku Seediq. Working Papers in Linguistics: University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa45.1:1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pan, Chia-Jung
    2015 Reported Evidentials in Saaroa, Kanakanavu, and Tsou. New Advances in Formosan Linguistics (Asia-Pacific Linguistics series studies on Austronesian Languages (SAL 003)), ed. byElizabeth Zeitoun, Stacy F. Teng and Joy J. Wu, 341–362. Australian National University, Canberra.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2018 Evidentiality in Formosan languages. The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, ed. byAlexandra Yurievna Aikhenvald, 657–673. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.31
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.31 [Google Scholar]
  42. Pietrandrea, Pietrandrea
    2005Epistemic Modality: Functional Properties and the Italian System. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.74
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.74 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pylkkännen, Liina
    2008Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Rackowski, Andrea, and Norvin Richards
    2005 Phase edge and extraction: A Tagalog case study. Linguistic Inquiry36.4:565–599. 10.1162/002438905774464368
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464368 [Google Scholar]
  45. Roberts, Ian G., and Anna Roussou
    2003Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rooryck, Johan
    2001a Evidentiality (Part I). Glot International5.4:125–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2001b Evidentiality (Part II). Glot International5.4:161–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Schachter, Paul
    1993 Tagalog. Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, ed. byJacobs Joachim, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann, 1418–1430. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Shih, Chaokai, and T.-H. Jonah Lin
    2011 A probe-based account of voice agreement in Formosan languages. The Proceedings of the Eighteenth Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA), ed. byLauren Clemens, Gregory Scontras and Maria Polinsky, 156–167. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Su, Yi-Fan
    2008 Adverbials in Takituduh Bunun. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Travis, Lisa
    2010Inner Aspect: The Articulation of VP. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑8550‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8550-4 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tsai, Zhong-han, and Si-qi Tseng
    1997The Structural Analysis of Amis Grammar. Taipei: Taiwan Aboriginal Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Vondiziano, Greg
    2018 Morphosemantics of locative focus ‘–an’ in Falangaw Amis. Paper presented at the14th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Antananarivo.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu, Chunming
    2006 Adverbials in Paiwan. Paper presented at the10th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, the Linguistic Society of the Philippines and SIL International, Palawan.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris
    2013 Verb initial order as predicate fronting in Isbukun Bunun. Language and Linguistics14.3:571–598.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2019 The syntactic categories of adverbials in Isbukun Bunun. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics45.1:1–23. 10.1075/consl.00001.wu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.00001.wu [Google Scholar]
  57. Wu, Jing-lan Joy
    1995 Complex Sentences in Amis. MA Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 2003 Clausal modifiers in Amis. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics29.2:59–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 2006 Verb Classification, Case Marking, and Grammatical Relations in Amis. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo.
  60. 2007 Voice markers in Amis: A Role and Reference Grammar analysis. Language and Linguistics8.1:95–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 2016Ameiyu Yufa Gailun [An Introduction to Amis Grammar] (1st edition). New Taipei: Council of Indigenous Peoples.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 2018Ameiyu Yufa Gailun [An Introduction to Amis Grammar] (2nd edition). New Taipei: Council of Indigenous Peoples.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Zeitoun, Elizabeth, Élodie Dupeyroux, and Hong-sui Lim
    2018 Do adverbs exist in Thao?Paper presented atWorkshop on Word Class and Teaching in Formosan Languages, Academia Sinica, Taipei.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/consl.22049.jhe
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.22049.jhe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error