oa On the general classifiers ge and zàg in Hakka

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2003 Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chao, Yuen Ren
   1968 A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chiu, Hsiang-Yun
   2007 Minnanyu he kejiahua de liangci: Yu guoyu bijiao [Measure words of Southern Min and Hakka: A comparison with Mandarin]. Hsuan Chuang Humanities Journal71:175–206.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor
   1988 Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language64.3:501–538. 10.2307/414531
   https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
5. Frankowsky, Maximilian, and Dan Ke
   2016 Humanness and classifiers in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study of anthropocentric classification. Language and Cognitive Science2.1:55–67. 10.17923/LCS201601003
   https://doi.org/10.17923/LCS201601003 [Google Scholar]
6. Goldberg, Adele E.
   1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Goldberg, Adele E.
   2003 Construction at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gries, Stefan Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch
   2004a Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics9.1:97–129. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri [Google Scholar]
9. Gries, Stefan Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch
   2004b Covarying collexemes in the into-causative. Language, Culture, and Mind, ed. byMichel Achard and Suzanne Kemmer, 225–236. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe, and Doris Schönefeld
    2005 Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics16.4:635–676. 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.635
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.635 [Google Scholar]
11. Hakka Affairs Council
    Hakka Affairs Council 2022 Taiwan Hakka Corpus. RetrievedNovember 26, 2022, fromhttps://corpus.hakka.gov.tw/
    [Google Scholar]
12. Her, One-Soon, and Chen-Tien Hsieh
    2010 On the semantic distinction between classifiers and measure words in Chinese. Language and Linguistics11.3:527–551.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Huang, Han-Chun
    2021 Yi dapei jiegou fenxi kan keyu zhong si ge biaoshi “ren” de fenleici [On four human-denoting classifiers in Hakka: A collostructional analysis]. Proceedings for the 30th Anniversary of Taiwan Languages and Literature Society, ed. byShu-chuan Chen and Min-hua Chiang, 177–193. Taipei: Taiwanese Languages and Literature Society.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jackendoff, Ray
    1997 Twistin’ the night away. Language731:534–559. 10.2307/415883
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415883 [Google Scholar]
15. Kay, Paul, and Charles J. Fillmore
    1999 Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s X doing Y? construction. Language75.1:1–33. 10.2307/417472
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417472 [Google Scholar]
16. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Manning, Christopher D., and Hinrich Schütze
    1999 Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Myers, James
    2000 Rules vs. analogy in Mandarin classifier selection. Language and Linguistics1.2:187–209.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries
    2003 Collocations: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8.2:209–243. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
20. Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries
    2005 Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory1.1:1–43. 10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
21. Tai, James Hao-Yi
    1994 Chinese classifier systems and human categorization. InHonor of Professor William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change, ed. byMatthew Y. Chen and Ovid Jyh-Lang Tzeng, 479–494. Taipei: Pyramid Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Tai, James Hao-Yi
    2006 Fenleici “wei” zai taiwan minnanyu yu keyu zhong de fanchou jiegou zhi bijiao [A comparison of categorial structures of classifier bue53/mi24 in Taiwan Southern Min and Hakka]. ON AND OFF WORK: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Chin-Chuan Cheng on his 70th Birthday, ed. byRaung-Fu Chung, Hsien-Chin Liou, Jia-Ling Hsu and Dah-an Ho, 57–73. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Tai, James Hao-Yi, and Lianqing Wang
    1990 A semantic study of the classifier tiao. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association251:35–56.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Tai, James Hao-Yi, and Li-wen Wu
    2006 Taiwan sixian keyu liangci “wei” de fanchou jiegou [Categorical structure of the classifier mi24 ‘tail’ in Sixian Hakka]. Language and Linguistics7.2:501–521.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Zhang, Niina Ning
    2013 Classifier Structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110304992
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110304992 [Google Scholar]
26. Zubin, David A., and Mitsuaki Shimojo
    1993 How ‘general’ are general classifiers? With special reference to ko and tsu in Japanese. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Semantic Typology and Semantic Universals, ed. byJ. Guenter, B. Kaiser and C. Zoll, 490–502. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v19i1.1508
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v19i1.1508 [Google Scholar]