1887
Volume 51, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1810-7478
  • E-ISSN: 2589-5230
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate an array of morphosyntactic properties that constrain the formation of externally-headed relative clauses (EHRCs) in Siwkolan Amis, an Austronesian language in Taiwan. Additionally, it seeks to address two key issues related to the syntax of relative clauses: connectivity and modification. First, I adopt the head raising analysis, also known as the Ā-extraction analysis, in light of island effects and idiomatic discontinuity. This analysis is very much in line with the subject-only restriction (Keenan & Comrie 1977) and the Austronesian Extraction Restriction hypothesis (Erlewine, Levin & van Urk 2017). Second, I argue that the head noun is structurally integrated into the EHRC through complementation. This structural relation is formed by the linker , which behaves similarly to a complementizer selecting TP as its complement, suggesting that the EHRC has a full-fledged CP structure. A structural analysis of Amis EHRCs is proposed to account for these associated properties and has implications for the syntax of modification in Amis. First, Amis modifier phrases consisting of -inflected verbs can be analyzed on a par with Amis EHRCs. Second, the subject-only restriction can be recast as saying that the head noun at [Spec, P] is structurally privileged.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/consl.24003.jhe
2025-05-22
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aldridge, Edith
    2003 Remnant movement in Tagalog relative clause formation. Linguistic Inquiry34.41:631–640. 10.1162/002438903322520179
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438903322520179 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2004a Internally headed relative clauses in Austronesian languages. Language and Linguistics5.11:99–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2004b Ergativity and Verb-Initial Word Order in Austronesian Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  4. Benţea, Anamaria
    2010 On restrictive relatives in Romanian: Towards a head raising analysis. Generative Grammar in Geneva61:165–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhatt, Rajesh
    2002 The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification. Natural Language Semantics10.11:43–90. 10.1023/A:1015536226396
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015536226396 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bianchi, Valentina
    1999Consequences of Asymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110803372
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803372 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2000 The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry31.11:123–140. 10.1162/002438900554316
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554316 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2002 Headed relative clauses in generative syntax — Part I. Glot International6.71: 197–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Borsley, Robert D.
    1997 Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure. Linguistic Inquiry28.41:629–647.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bril, Isabelle
    2017 Roots and stems: Lexical and functional flexibility in Amis and Nêlêmwa. Studies in Language41.21:358–407. 10.1075/sl.41.2.04bri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.2.04bri [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang, Henry Yungli
    2017 The AV-only restriction and locality in Formosan Languages. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies47.21:231–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, Sihwei
    2014 The syntactic categories of adverbials in Atayal. UBC Working Papers in Linguistics, vol.381, ed. byZoe Lam and Natalie Weber, 1–26. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, Ting-chun
    2018 Multiple Case Assignment: An Amis Case Study. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
  14. Chen, Yi-ting
    2010 The Amis left periphery. Oceanic Linguistics49.21:339–358. 10.1353/ol.2010.a411416
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2010.a411416 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2016 Raising out of CP in Mod-Asp adverbial verb constructions in Amis. Oceanic Linguistics55.11:116–133. 10.1353/ol.2016.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2016.0013 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, and Laura J. Downing
    2007 The prosody and syntax of Zulu relative clauses. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics151:51–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chomsky, Noam
    1977 On wh-movement. Formal Syntax, ed. byPeter Cullicover, Thomas Wasow and Adrian Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1986Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2000 Minimalist inquiries. Step by Step: Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. byRoger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka and Samuel Jay Keyser, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2008 On phases. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, ed. byRobert Freidin, Carlos Peregrin Otero and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Corver, Norbert
    2006 Freezing effects. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax (2nd edition), ed. byMartin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 383–406. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch28
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch28 [Google Scholar]
  23. de Vries, Mark
    2002 The Syntax of Relativization. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
  24. 2018Relative Clauses in Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. RetrievedDecember 12, 2023. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.56
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.56 [Google Scholar]
  25. den Dikken, Marcel
    2006The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion and Copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. den Dikken, Marcel, and Pornsiri Singhapreecha
    2004 Complex noun phrases and linkers. Syntax7.11:1–54. 10.1111/j.1368‑0005.2004.00064.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-0005.2004.00064.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka
    2019 Patterns of relativization in Austronesian and Tibetan. Paper presented at theWorkshop on Comparative Syntax in East and Southeast Asia, Sogang University, Seoul.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka, Theodore Levin, and Coppe van Urk
    2017 Ergativity and Austronesian-type voice systems. Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, ed. byJessica Coon, Diane Massam and Lisa deMena Travis, 373–396. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.16
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.16 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fox, Danny, and David Pesetsky
    2005 Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics31.1–21:1–45. 10.1515/thli.2005.31.1‑2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2005.31.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Giusti, Giuliana
    1993La Sintassi dei Determinant [The Syntax of the Determiner]. Padua, Italy: Unipress.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Guilfoyle, Eithne, Henrietta Hung, and Lisa Travis
    1992 Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory10.31:375–424. 10.1007/BF00133368
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133368 [Google Scholar]
  32. Haegeman, Liliane
    2012 The syntax of MCP: Deriving the truncation account. Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons, ed. byAelbrecht Lobke, Liliane Haegeman and Rachel Nye, 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/la.190.05hae
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.05hae [Google Scholar]
  33. Harley, Heidi
    2009 The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization, ed. byMonika Rathert and Anastasia Giannadikou, 320–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil Achuthan
    2014 Coordination, relativization and finiteness in Dravidian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory32.11:191–211. 10.1007/s11049‑013‑9222‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9222-8 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jheng, Wei-Cherng Sam
    2022 The syntax of nominal modification and complex noun phrases in Siwkolan Amis. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics48.11:70–113. 10.1075/consl.21014.jhe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.21014.jhe [Google Scholar]
  36. Kayne, Richard
    1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Keenan, Edward Louis, and Bernard Comrie
    1977 Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry8.11:63–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Law, Paul
    2015 The syntax of Tagalog relative clauses. Proceedings of the 21st Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA-21), ed. byAmber Camp, Yuko Otsuka, Claire Stabile and Nozomi Tanaka, 167–184. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, Ting-Wu Terry
    2010 On Relative Clause Constructions in Saysiyat. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, Adlay Kun-long
    2005 The structure of relative clauses in Jianshi Squlia Atayal. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics31.21:89–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, Dorinda Tsai-hsiu
    1999 Cleft Constructions in Amis. MA thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, Emma En-hsin
    2003 Conjunction and Modification in Amis. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. McKee, Cecile, and Dana McDaniel
    2001 Resumptive pronouns in English relative clauses. Language Acquisition9.21:113–156. 10.1207/S15327817LA0902_01
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327817LA0902_01 [Google Scholar]
  44. Rackowski, Andrea
    2002 The Structure of Tagalog: Specificity, Voice, and the Distribution of Arguments. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
  45. Rackowski, Andrea, and Norvin Richards
    2005 Phase edge and extraction: A Tagalog case study. Linguistic Inquiry36.41:565–599. 10.1162/002438905774464368
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464368 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, ed. byLiliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ross, Malcolm, and Stacy Fang-ching Teng
    2005 Formosan languages and linguistic typology. Language and Linguistics6.41:739–781.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Schachter, Paul
    1973 Focus and relativization. Language49.11:19–46. 10.2307/412101
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412101 [Google Scholar]
  49. Shi, Chaokai
    2009 The Linker tu in Isbukun Bunun. MA thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Shih, Chaokai, and Tzong-Hong Jonah Lin
    2011 A probe-based account of voice agreement in Formosan languages. Proceedings of the 18th Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA-18), ed. byLauren Clemens, Gregory Scontras, Gregory Scontras and Maria Polinsky, 156–167Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sung, Li-May
    2000 Nominalization in Rukai and Amis. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA-7), ed. byMarian Klamer, 245–258. Amsterdam: Vrije University Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Teng, Stacy Fang-ching
    2008A Grammar of Puyuma, an Austronesian Language of Taiwan. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan
    2007 Conjunctive reduction and its Origin: A comparative study of Tsou, Amis, and Squliq Atayal. Oceanic Linguistics46.21:585–602. 10.1353/ol.2008.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2008.0009 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris
    2013 Restructuring and clause structure in Isbukun Bunun. Oceanic Linguistics52.11:69–85. 10.1353/ol.2013.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2013.0000 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2014 Complex noun phrases and formal licensing in Isbukun Bunun. Oceanic Linguistics53.21:207–224. 10.1353/ol.2014.0016
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2014.0016 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wu, Jing-lan Joy
    1995 Complex Sentences in Amis. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 1997 Relative clauses in some Formosan languages. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, ed. byElizabeth Zeitoun and Paul Jen-kuei Li, 159–184. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 2003 Clausal modifiers in Amis. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics29.21:59–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 2006 Verb Classification, Case Marking, and Grammatical Relations in Amis. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo.
  60. 2007 “Voice” markers in Amis: A role and reference grammar analysis. Language and Linguistics8.11:95–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 2018Ameiyu Yufa Gailun [An Introduction to Amis Grammar] (2nd edition). New Taipei City: Council of Indigenous Peoples.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Wurmbrand, Susi
    2001Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Zeng, Siqi, and Zong-han Tsai
    1997Grammatical analysis of Amis. Taipei: Taiwan Aborigines Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.24003.jhe
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.24003.jhe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error