1887
image of On the putative classifier languages in Europe
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In Eurasia, the hotbed of classifier languages as an areal feature is in East Asia, Southeast Asia, part of eastern India, and a less concentrated cluster in the Middle East and Central Asia. In Europe, only a few languages have been claimed to employ numeral classifiers. Russian, located in Eastern Europe, has a tripartite numeral construction [Num X N], where X’s are considered sortal classifiers by some researchers, e.g., Sussex (1976) and Goto (2012), and is listed as a classifier language in the World Atlas of Classifier Languages (WACL). However, the status of Russian as a classifier language is controversial. In this paper, we first adopt the definition of classifier languages proposed by Her, Hammarström & Allassonnière-Tang (2022). We then apply explicit syntactic criteria to evaluate Russian numeral constructions and examine the tripartite [Num X N] structure. Ultimately, our analysis demonstrates that the elements previously identified as sortal classifiers in Russian are in fact measure nouns, and we reject their classification after examining the reasons behind this misidentification. The findings suggest that it would be prudent to reexamine all putative classifier languages in Europe.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/consl.24018.hsu
2026-04-21
2026-05-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2000Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198238867.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238867.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., and David Green
    2011 Palikur and the typology of classifiers. Language at Large: Essays on Syntax and Semantics, ed. byAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004206076.i‑606.89
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004206076.i-606.89 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allassonnière-Tang, Marc, Zhong-liang Gao, Shen-An Chen, and One-Soon Her
    2023 Phylogenetic analyses for the origin of numeral classifiers in Mongolic, Tungusic, and Turkic languages. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics:–.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Allassonnière-Tang, Marc, Olof Lundgren, Maja Robbers, Sandra Cronhamn, Filip Larsson, One-Soon Her, Harald Hammarström, and Gerd Carling
    2021 Expansion by migration and diffusion by contact is a source to the global diversity of linguistic nominal categorization systems. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications:. 10.1057/s41599‑021‑01003‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-01003-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Andersen, Henning
    2006 Some thoughts on the history of Russian numeral syntax. Harvard Ukrainian Studies.–:–.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barz, Richard K., and Anthony V. N. Diller
    1985 Classifiers and standardization: Some South and South-East Asian comparisons. Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics No.9: Language Policy, Language Planning and Sociolinguistics in South-East Asia, ed. byDavid Bradley, –. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blench, Roger
    2012 The role of agriculture in explaining the diversity of Amerindian languages. The Past Ahead: Language, Culture and Identity in the Neotropics, ed. byChristian Isendahl, –. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Shen-An, Marc Allassonnière-Tang, Yung-Ping Liang, and One-Soon Her
    2024 On the distribution and origin of sortal classifiers in Altaic languages. Journal of Chinese Linguistics.:–. 10.1353/jcl.2017.a923479
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2017.a923479 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chierchia, Gennaro
    1998 Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics:–. 10.1023/A:1008324218506
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cinque, Guglielmo, and Iliyana Krapova
    2007 A note on Bulgarian numeral classifiers. Pitar Moş: A Building with a View. Papers in Honour of Alexandra Cornilescu, ed. byGabriela Alboiu, Andrei A. Avram, Larisa Avram and Daniela Isac, –. Bucharest, Romania: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Comtet, Roger
    1993 L’emploi de čelovek comme proforme en russe contemporain [The employment of čelovek as pro-form in contemporary Russian]. Revue des Études Slaves Année:–. 10.3406/slave.1993.6103
    https://doi.org/10.3406/slave.1993.6103 [Google Scholar]
  12. Corbett, Greville G.
    1978 Numerous squishes and squishy numerals in Slavonic. International Review of Slavic Linguistics:–.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dayal, Veneeta
    2004 Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy:–. 10.1023/B:LING.0000024420.80324.67
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LING.0000024420.80324.67 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dékány, Éva, and Veronika Hegedűs
    2021 Postpositions: Formal and semantic classification. Syntax of Hungarian: Postpositions and Postpositional Phrases, ed. byKatalin É. Kiss and Veronika Hegedűs, –. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv1kmj874.5
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kmj874.5 [Google Scholar]
  15. Emeneau, Murray Barson
    1956 India as a linguistic area. Language:–. 10.2307/410649
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410649 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gil, David
    2013 Numeral classifiers. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. byMatthew S. Dryer and Martin Maspelmath. Leipzig, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. RetrievedApril 7, 2025, fromhttps://wals.info/feature/55A#2/28.0/149.9.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goto, Ksenia
    2012 On Russian numeral classifiers. Collection of Essay of Modern Language and Culture:–.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Greenberg, Joseph Harold
    1990 Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. On Language: Selected Writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, ed. byKeith Denning and Suzanne Kemmer, –. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Haspelmath, Martin
    2001 The European linguistic area: Standard average European. Language Typology and Language Universals, ed. byMartin Haspelmath, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110171549.2.14.1492
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110171549.2.14.1492 [Google Scholar]
  20. Her, One-Soon
    2012a Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua:–. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2012b Structure of classifiers and measure words: A lexical functional account. Language and Linguistics:–.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Her, One-Soon, Harald Hammarström, and Marc Allassonnière-Tang
    2022 Defining numeral classifiers and identifying classifier languages of the world. Linguistics Vanguard:–. 10.1515/lingvan‑2022‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Her, One-Soon, and Bing-Tsiong Li
    2023 A single origin of numeral classifiers in Asia and the Pacific: A hypothesis. Nominal Classification in Asia and Oceania: Functional and Diachronic Perspectives, ed. byMarc Allassonnière-Tang and Marcin Kilarski, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/cilt.362.05her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.362.05her [Google Scholar]
  24. Hikita, Go
    2018Eyu Wenfa Daquan [Complete Russian Grammar]. New Taipei City: Taiwan Mansion International Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hölzl, Andreas, and Chundra Cathcart
    2019 Sortal numeral classifiers in Central Asia. Paper presented at the13th Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hurford, Jim R.
    2003 The interaction between numerals and nouns. Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe, ed. byFrans Plank, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Khrizman, Keren
    2016 Functional unit classifiers in (non)-classifier Russian. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication:–. 10.4148/1944‑3676.1115
    https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-3676.1115 [Google Scholar]
  28. Letuchiy, Alexander B.
    2020 Russian constructions with numerals and quantifiers: Their non-standard use in the subject and object position. Rhema:–. 10.31862/2500‑2953‑2020‑1‑70‑89
    https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-2953-2020-1-70-89 [Google Scholar]
  29. Mel’čuk, Igor A.
    1985Поверхностный синтаксис русских числовых выражений [Surface Syntax of Russian Numeral Expressions]. Vienna, Austria: Institut für Slawistik der Universität Wien.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nesset, Tore
    2020 A long birth: The development of gender-specific paucal constructions in Russian. Diachronica.–:–. 10.1075/dia.18057.nes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18057.nes [Google Scholar]
  31. Paperno, Denis
    2012 Quantification in Standard Russian. Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language, ed. byEdward L. Keenan and Denis Paperno, –. Dortrecht, Netherlands: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑2681‑9_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2681-9_14 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rijkhoff, Jan
    1998 Order in the noun phrase of the languages of Europe. Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe, ed. byAnna Siewierska, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110812206.321
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110812206.321 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ross, John Robert
    1972 The category squish: Endstation Hauptwort. Proceedings of the 8th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. byPaul. M. Peranteau, Judith. N. Levi and Gloria. C. Phares, –. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rothstein, Susan
    2010 Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics:–. 10.1093/jos/ffq007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq007 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sera, Maria D., Hooi Ling Soh, Drew Brinker, Jenny Yi-Chun Kuo, Judith W. Fuller, Christopher Hammerly, James Stevens, Ruxue Shao, Chris Batteen, Dingcheng Li, Nobuko Davis, and Wenting Cai
    2023 A cross-cultural study of language and cognition: Numeral classifiers and solid object categorization. Memory & Cognition:–. 10.3758/s13421‑022‑01376‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01376-1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Stepanov, Arthur, and Penka Stateva
    2018 Countability, agreement and the loss of the dual in Russian. Journal of Linguistics:–. 10.1017/S0022226718000130
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226718000130 [Google Scholar]
  37. Stilo, Don
    2018 Numeral classifier systems in the Araxes-Iran linguistic area. The Diachrony of Classification Systems, ed. byWilliam B. McGregor and Søren Wichmann, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/cilt.342.06sti
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.342.06sti [Google Scholar]
  38. Sussex, Roland
    1976 The numeral classifiers of Russian. Russian Linguistics:–. 10.1007/BF03545839
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03545839 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sussex, Roland, and Paul Cubberley
    2006The Slavic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486807
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486807 [Google Scholar]
  40. Timberlake, Alan
    2004A Reference Grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Zimmermann, Malte
    2011 On the functional architecture of DP and the feature content of pronominal quantifiers in Low German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics:–. 10.1007/s10828‑011‑9046‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-011-9046-z [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.24018.hsu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.24018.hsu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error