Word order optionality in question formation in Chinese copula clauses

References

1. Aoun, Joseph, and Yen-Hui Audrey Li
   1993 Wh-elements in-situ: Syntax or LF?Linguistic Inquiry24.21:199–238.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bošković, Željko
   2009 More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica63.21:187–203. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2009.01158.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2009.01158.x [Google Scholar]
3. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
   1991 On the Typology of Wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
4. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
   2021 What-as-why sentences in Cantonese. Why is ‘Why’ Unique?: Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties, ed. byGabriela Soare, 219–246. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110675160‑008
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110675160-008 [Google Scholar]
5. Chien, Wei-Hsuan Cathy
   2025 Deriving V-de Verb Copying Constructions in Mandarin Chinese. MA Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chomsky, Noam
   1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chomsky, Noam
   2001 Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. byMichael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004
   https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
8. Chomsky, Noam
   2013 Problems of projection. Lingua130.61:33–49. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003 [Google Scholar]
9. Chomsky, Noam
   2015 Problems of projection: Extensions. Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, ed. byElisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini, 3–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/la.223.01cho
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.01cho [Google Scholar]
10. Huang, Cheng-Teh James
    1982 Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
11. Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L., and Mercedes Tubino-Blanco
    2023 Inferential interrogatives with qué in Spanish. Languages8.41:1–23. 10.3390/languages8040282
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8040282 [Google Scholar]
12. Lin, Jo-wang
    2010 A tenseless analysis of Mandarin Chinese revisited: A response to Sybesma 2007. Linguistic Inquiry41.21:305–329. 10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.305
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.305 [Google Scholar]
13. Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah
    2015 Tense in Mandarin Chinese sentences. Syntax18.31:320–342. 10.1111/synt.12032
    https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12032 [Google Scholar]
14. Moro, Andrea
    2000 Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Moro, Andrea
    2004 Linear compression as a trigger for movement. Triggers, ed. byAnne Breitbarth and Henk van Riemsdijk, 387–430. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197433.387
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197433.387 [Google Scholar]
16. Moro, Andrea
    2020 The matrix: Merge and the typology of syntactic categories. Syntactic Architecture and its Consequences II: Between Syntax and Morphology, ed. byAndrás Bárány, Theresa Biberauer, Jamie Douglas and Sten Vikner, 81–92. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Moro, Andrea, and Ian Roberts
    2023 The duality of syntax: Unstable structures, labelling and linearisation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory42.21:609–631.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Panagiotidis, Phoevos
    2002 Pronouns, Clitics and Empty Nouns. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/la.46
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.46 [Google Scholar]
19. Postal, Paul
    1969 On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. Modern Studies in English, ed. byDavid A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ritter, Elizabeth
    1995 On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory13.31:405–443. 10.1007/BF00992737
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992737 [Google Scholar]
21. Rizzi, Luigi
    2016 Labeling, maximality and the head-phrase distinction. The Linguistic Review33.11:103–127. 10.1515/tlr‑2015‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2015-0016 [Google Scholar]
22. Sybesma, Rint
    2007 Whether we tense-agree overtly or not. Linguistic Inquiry38.31:580–587. 10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.580
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.580 [Google Scholar]
23. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
    2021 On applicative why-questions in Chinese. Why is ‘Why’ Unique?: Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties, ed. ByGabriela Soare, 197–218. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110675160‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110675160-007 [Google Scholar]
24. Uriagereka, Juan
    1995 Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry26.11:79–123.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Yang, Barry Chung-Yu
    2021 Two types of peripheral adjunct WHATs. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics47.11:61–92. 10.1075/consl.00023.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.00023.yan [Google Scholar]