1887
Volume 51, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1810-7478
  • E-ISSN: 2589-5230

Abstract

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of non-canonical -questions from a cross-linguistic perspective. This study claims that they are encoded through the interaction of various functional elements, prosodic constraints and pragmatic construals. Our investigation reveals that they combine a -expression with a modal element that can be either lexical or silent. Prosodically, they are characterized by distinct pitch and stress patterns. In terms of semantics, these constructions involve negation over modal quantification in conjunction with various not-at-issue contents such as expectations and presuppositions. Pragmatically, they change information-seeking into a denial/disapproval act, typically raising objections to the at-issue content within the scope of sentential -adverbs. Finally, we suggest that the origin of non-canonical -questions may well trace back to the hierarchical arrangement of causal and source questions: Namely, they are disrupted when the speaker is no longer interested in the cause-effect relationship, holding instead a negative attitude towards the interlocutor’s remarks or behavior. Our approach thus sheds new light on the complex nature of non-canonical -questions in relation to their interrogative counterparts.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/consl.25002.tsa
2025-11-06
2025-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/consl.25002.tsa.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/consl.25002.tsa&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aboh, Enoch Oladé
    2004The Morphosyntax of Complement-Head Sequences: Clause Structure and Word Order Patterns in Kwa. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159905.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159905.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler, Jonny
    2003 A minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua113.101:967–996. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(02)00146‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00146-8 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng, Lisa L.-S.
    2007 Verb copying in Mandarin Chinese. The Copy Theory of Movement, ed. byNorbert Corver and Jairo Nunes, 151–174. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/la.107.07che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.107.07che [Google Scholar]
  4. 2021What-as-why sentences in Cantonese. Why is Why Unique? Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties, ed. byGabriela Soare, 219–246. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110675160‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110675160-008 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheung, Lawrence Y.-L.
    2008 The Negative Wh-construction. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  6. Chomsky, Noam
    1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamblin, Charles L.
    1973 Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language10.11:41–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Han, Chung-Hye
    2002 Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua112.31:201–229. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(01)00044‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00044-4 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hornstein, Norbert, and Jairo Nunes
    2002 On asymmetries between parasitic gap and across-the-board constructions. Syntax5.11:26–54. 10.1111/1467‑9612.00046
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00046 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu, Jianhua
    2023 “He you yu wo zai” de jufa yuyi ji qita [On the syntax and semantics of “he you yu wo zai” and related issues]. Paper presented at the29th Annual Conference of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-29), Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang, Cheng-Teh James
    1994 Verb movement and some syntax-semantics mismatches in Chinese. Chinese Languages and Linguistics21:587–613.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1997 On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Languages and Linguistics3.11:45–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Iatridou, Sabine, and Hedde Zeijlstra
    2013 Negation, Polarity, and Deontic Modals. Linguistic Inquiry44.41:529–568. 10.1162/LING_a_00138
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00138 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ishida, Tomohiro, Feng-fan Hsieh, and Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai
    2024 On prosody of non-canonical wh-expressions: A comparative study of Mandarin Chinese and Japanese. Paper presented in theInterdisciplinary Workshop on Linguistics, National Tsing Hua University. Hsinchu.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Karttunen, Lauri
    1977 Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy1.11:3–44. 10.1007/BF00351935
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351935 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kayne, Richard
    1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kwok, Bit-Chee
    2003 Xianggang yueyu yiwen daici “dian [tim35]” de laiyuan [The origin of the Hong Kong Cantonese interrogative pronoun “dian [tim 35]”]. Yuyanxue Luncong271:69–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Landau, Idan
    2007 Constraints on partial VP-fronting. Syntax10.21:127–164. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2007.00099.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00099.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Lau, Seng-Hian, and Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai
    2020 A comparative study of how and why in Taiwan Southern Min and Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics21.21:254–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lohnstein, Horst
    2018 Verum focus, sentence Mood, and contrast. The Grammatical Realization of Polarity: Theoretical and Experimental Approaches, ed. byChristine Dimroth and Stefan Sudhoff, 55–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/la.249.02loh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.249.02loh [Google Scholar]
  21. Lü, Shuxiang
    1985Jindai Hanyu Zhidaici [Pronouns in Modern Chinese] Shanghai: Xuelin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mei, Guang
    2015Shanggu Hanyu Yufa Ganyao [Outline of Archaic Chinese Grammar]. Taipei: San Min Book.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meisterernst, Barbara
    2020 Possibility and necessity and the scope of negation in Early Middle Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics7.11:1–44. 10.1075/ijchl.19013.mei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.19013.mei [Google Scholar]
  24. 2025The Diachronic Development of Modal Expressions in Chinese. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nunes, Jairo
    2004Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4241.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4241.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pan, Victor Junnan
    2015 Mandarin peripheral construals at the syntax-discourse interface. The Linguistic Review32.41:819–868. 10.1515/tlr‑2015‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2015-0005 [Google Scholar]
  27. Phan, Trần, and Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai
    2022 Surprise-denial/disapproval what-questions in Vietnamese: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society Special Publication91:168–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2025 Traversing the “where” landscape: Vietnamese đâu and the clausal architecture of Vietnamese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics341:59–96. 10.1007/s10831‑024‑09288‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-024-09288-8 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ramchand, Gillian
    2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486319
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319 [Google Scholar]
  30. Rett, Jessica
    2012 Miratives across constructions and languages. Paper presented at the5th California Universities Semantics and Pragmatics (CUSP-5), University of California, San Diego, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Rett, Jessica, and Beth Sturman
    2021 Prosodically marked mirativity. Proceedings of the 37th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics Conference (WCCFL-37), ed. byDaniel K. E. Reisinger and Marianne Huijsmans, 1–20. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. Elements of Grammar, ed. byLiliane Haegeman, 281–338. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  33. Shao, Jingmin
    1995 “Zenme” yiwenju de yufa yiyi ji gongneng leixing [The syntactic meaning and functional types of “zenme” interrogative sentences]. Yufa Yanjiu he Tansuo [Research and Exploration in Grammar], vol.71, ed. bythe Editorial Department of Zhongguo Yuwen Zazhishe [Studies of The Chinese Language], 185–199. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 1996Xiandai Hanyu Yiwenju Yanjiu [Interrogative Sentences in Modern Chinese]. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Shlonsky, Ur, and Gabriela Soare
    2011 Where’s ‘Why’?Linguistic Inquiry42.41:651–669. 10.1162/LING_a_00064
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00064 [Google Scholar]
  36. Stepanov, Arthur, and Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai
    2008 Cartography and licensing of wh-adjuncts: A cross-linguistic perspective. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory26.31:589–638. 10.1007/s11049‑008‑9047‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9047-z [Google Scholar]
  37. Tang, Sze-Wing
    2009 Zenme yong shenme wen weishenme — Lishi han gongshi de yanjiu [How to ask why by using what — A diachronic and synchronic perspective]. Yuyanxue Luncong401:233–250.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2011 Wen yuanyin de zenme [On causal How in Chinese]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies32.21:43–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
    2008 Left Periphery and How-Why Alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics17.21:83–115. 10.1007/s10831‑008‑9021‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9021-0 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2011 Cong “Zhe hua cong he shuo qi” [Speaking from “where does this come from?”], Yuyanxue Luncong431:194–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2015a A tale of two peripheries: Evidence from Chinese adverbials, light verbs, applicatives and object fronting. The Cartography of Chinese Syntax, ed. byWei-Tien Dylan Tsai, 1–32. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2015b On the topography of Chinese modals. Beyond Functional Sequence, ed. byUr Shlonsky, 275–294. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2019 Hanyu yuqi de xianzhuxing han yinxing motai fanchou [Mood prominence and silent modals of Chinese]. Language Science18.11:1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2021 On applicative why-questions in Chinese. Why is ‘Why’ Unique? Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties, ed. byGabriela Soare, 197–218. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110675160‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110675160-007 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2024 On projecting causality. Nordlyd48.11:25–37. 10.7557/12.7970
    https://doi.org/10.7557/12.7970 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan, and Ching-Yu Helen Yang
    2022 On the syntax of mirativity: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in Honor of Yen-Hui Audrey Li, ed. byAndrew Simpson, 431–444. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/la.272.15tsa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.15tsa [Google Scholar]
  47. Vanrell, Maria del Mar
    2013 Pitch accent types and the perception of focus in Majorcan Catalan wh-questions. Prosody and Iconicity, ed. bySylvie Hancil and Daniel Hirst, 127–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/ill.13.07van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.13.07van [Google Scholar]
  48. Yang, Barry Chung-Yu
    2021 Two types of peripheral adjunct WHATs. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics47.11:61–92. 10.1075/consl.00023.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.00023.yan [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang, Yang, and Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai
    2019 Nianli yizhuan de yunlüyufa ji shiyanyanjiu [An experimental study on the prosodic syntax of force shift]. Chinese Teaching in the World33.11:36–46.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.25002.tsa
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/consl.25002.tsa
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error