On the validity of descriptors in ACTFL Language Proficiency Guidelines

References

1. Abbott, M. G., & Phillips, J. K.
   (2011) A Decade of Foreign Language Standards: Influence, Impact, and Future Directions: Survey Results (Unpublished raw data). ACTFL, Alexandria, VA, USA, & Weber State University, Ogden, UT, USA.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ACTFL
   ACTFL (2012) ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines, Retrieved fromhttps://www.actfl.org/educator-resources/actfl-proficiency-guidelines
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alderson, J. C.
   (2000) Assessing Reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 85–115. 10.1017/CBO9780511732935.004
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732935.004 [Google Scholar]
4. Bachman, L. F., Savignon, S. J.
   (1986) The evaluation of communicative language proficiency: a critique of the ACTFL oral interview, Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 380–390. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1986.tb05294.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05294.x [Google Scholar]
5. Bachman, L. F.
   (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
   (1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clifford, R., & Cox, T. L.
   (2013) Empirical validation of reading proficiency guidelines. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 45–61. 10.1111/flan.12033
   https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12033 [Google Scholar]
8. Council of Europe
   Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Council of Europe
   Council of Europe (2009) Relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR): A manual. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division. Retrieved fromhttps://rm.coe.int/1680667a2d
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cox, T. L., & Clifford, R.
    (2014) Empirical validation of listening proficiency guidelines, Foreign Language Annals, 47 (3), 379–403. 10.1111/flan.12096
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12096 [Google Scholar]
11. Cox, T. L., & Malone, E.
    (2018) A validity argument to support the ACTFL Assessment of Performance Toward Proficiency in Languages (AAPPL), Foreign Language Annals, 51(3), 548–574. 10.1111/flan.12353
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12353 [Google Scholar]
12. Cox, T. L., Malone, M. E., & Winke, P.
    (2018) Future directions in assessment: Influences of standards and for language learning, Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 104–115. 10.1111/flan.12326
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12326 [Google Scholar]
13. Cuieford, J.
    (1965) Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dandonoli, P., & Henning, G.
    (1990) An investigation of the construct validity of the ACTFL proficiency guidelines and oral interview procedure, Foreign Language Annals, 23(1), 11–22. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1990.tb00330.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1990.tb00330.x [Google Scholar]
15. Davis-Becker, S. L., & Buckendahl, C. W.
    (2013) A proposed framework for evaluating alignment studies. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32(1), 23–33. 10.1111/emip.12002
    https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12002 [Google Scholar]
16. Gong, Q.
    (1994) Xiandai Hanyu de Shijian Xitong现代汉语的时间系统 [Time System of Modern Chinese Language]. Chinese Teaching in The World世界汉语教学, 27(1), 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Green, A.
    (2018) Linking Tests of English for Academic Purposes to the CEFR: The Score User’s Perspective, Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(1), 59–74. 10.1080/15434303.2017.1350685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1350685 [Google Scholar]
18. Herzog, M.
    (2012) How did the language proficiency scale get started?Retrieved fromhttps://govtilr.org/Skills/IRL%20Scale%20History.htm
    [Google Scholar]
19. ILR
    ILR (1985) ILR language proficiency skill level descriptions. Retrieved fromhttps://govtilr.org/Skills/ILRscale1.htm
20. Jin, C., & Zhang, X.
    (1998) Xiandai Hanyu Shiti Yanjiu Shuping现代汉语时体研究述评 [A Review of Time and Aspect Research in Modern Chinese]. Chinese Language Learning汉语学习, 19 (4), 32–37.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jin, L.
    (2002) Ciwei Le de Shiti Yiyi Jiqi Jufa Tiaojian词尾“了”的时体意义及其句法条件[The Aspectual Significance of the Suffix Le and Its Syntactic Conditions]. Chinese Teaching in The World世界汉语教学, 15 (1), 34–44.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lantolf, J., & Frawley, W.
    (1985) Oral proficiency testing: a critical analysis, Modern Language Journal, 4, 337–345.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lantolf, J., & Frawley, W.
    (1988) Proficiency, understanding the construct, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(2), 181–196. 10.1017/S0272263100007300
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007300 [Google Scholar]
24. Lantolf, J., & Frawley, W.
    (1992) Rejecting the OPI again: a response to Hagen, ADFL Bulletin, 23(2), 34–37. 10.1632/adfl.23.2.34
    https://doi.org/10.1632/adfl.23.2.34 [Google Scholar]
25. Lee, F. L., & Musumeci, D.
    (1988) On hierarchies of reading skills and text types, Modern Language, 72(2), 173–185. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1988.tb04179.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04179.x [Google Scholar]
26. Li, R.
    (1985) Guanyu Hanyu Fangyan Fenqu de Yijian关于汉语方言分区的意见[The division of Chinese dialects]. Dialect方言, 6(3), 161–162.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Li, R.
    (2014) Hanyu de Tedian Yu Duiwai Hanyu Jiaoxue汉语的特点与对外汉语教学 [Characteristics of Chinese and Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies语言教学与研究, 17(3), 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Liu, Y., Li, P. & Li, Y.
    (2020) Hanyu Guoji Jiaoyu Hanyu Shuiping Dengji Biaozhun Quanqiuhua zhi Lu汉语国际教育汉语水平等级标准全球化之路 [A Path to The Globalization of Chinese Proficiency Standards]. Chinese Teaching in The World世界汉语教学, 34(2), 147–157.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lu, Ji
    (2015) Hanyu Tedian zhi Wojian汉语“特点”之我见 [My Understanding of the Characteristic of Chinese Language]. Journal of Chinese Studies, Xiamen University厦大中文学报, 89(2), 16–26.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Magnan, S. S.
    (1987) Rater reliability of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview. The Canadian ModernLanguage Review, 43(4), 267–279.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China
    Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China (2021) Guoji Zhongwen Jiaoyu Zhongwen Dengji Biaozhun国际中文教育中文水平等级标准[Chinese Proficiency Grading Standards for International Chinese Language Education]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University.
    [Google Scholar]
32. North, B.
    (2000) The development of a common framework scale of language proficiency. New York: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑1‑4539‑1059‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1059-7 [Google Scholar]
33. National Language Work Committee and National Education Commission
    National Language Work Committee and National Education Commission (1988) 国家语言文字工作委员会和国家教育委员会. Guójiā yǔyán wénzì gōngzuò wěiyuán huì héguó jiājyù wěiyuánhuì “List of Commonly Used Characters in Modern Chinese”《现代 汉语常用字表》xiàndàihànyǔ chángyòng zìbiǎo, Retrieved fromhttps://hanzi.unihan.com.cn/downloads/现代汉语常用字表.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
34. Spolsky, B.
    (1986) A multiple choice for language testers. Language Testing, 3(2),147–158. 10.1177/026553228600300204
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228600300204 [Google Scholar]
35. Stockwell, R., & Minkova, D.
    (2001) English Words: History and Structure. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791161
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791161 [Google Scholar]
36. Surface, E., & Dierdorff, E.
    (2003) Reliability and the ACTFL oral proficiency interview: Reporting indices of36(4), 507–519. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2003.tb02140.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02140.x [Google Scholar]
37. Thompson, I.
    (1995) A study of interrater reliability of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Iinterview in five European languages: Data from English, French, German, Russian, and Spanish. Foreign Language Annals, 28(3), 407–422. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1995.tb00808.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1995.tb00808.x [Google Scholar]
38. Yan, Y.
    (2013) Pinyin Wenzi Beijing Chuji Xuexizhe Xide Hanzi de Renzhi Fangshi he Jiagong Danyuan Diaocha拼音文字背景初级学习者习得汉字的认知方式和加工单元调查 [An Investigation in Chinese Character Cognitive Mode and Processing Units of Elementary Learners with Alphabetic-writing Background]. Chinese Language Learning汉语学习, (33)31, 77–88.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Zhang, J., & Sheng, H.
    (1999) Zhengti Yu Bufen de Guanxi Dui Hanzi de Zhijue Fenli Yingxiang de Yanjiu整体与部分的关系对汉字的直觉分离影响的研究 [Study on the Influence of the Relationship of the Wholes and Their Parts in the Perceptual Separation of Chinese Characters]. Acta Psychologica Sinica心理学报, 31(4), 369–376.
    [Google Scholar]