Aligning curriculum design with proficiency levels in a Chinese language program

References

1. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages
   American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (2024) ACTFL proficiency guidelines. https://www.actfl.org/uploads/files/general/Resources-Publications/ACTFL_Proficiency_Guidelines_2024.pdf
2. Center for Language Education and Cooperation, Ministry of Education
   Center for Language Education and Cooperation, Ministry of Education (2021) Guoji Zhongwen Jiaoyu Zhongwen Shuiping Dengji Biaozhun国际中文教育中文水平等级标准 [Chinese proficiency grading standards for international Chinese language education]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Clark, J. L., & Clifford, R. T.
   (1988) The FSI/ILR/ACTFL proficiency scales and testing techniques: Development, current status, and needed research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(2), 129–147. 10.1017/S0272263100007270
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007270 [Google Scholar]
4. Council of Europe
   Council of Europe (2020) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment — Companion volume, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, available atwww.coe.int/lang-cefr
   [Google Scholar]
5. Isbell, D. R., Winke, P., & Gass, S. M.
   (2019) Using the ACTFL OPIc to assess proficiency and monitor progress in a tertiary foreign languages program. Language Testing, 36(3), 439–465. 10.1177/0265532218798139
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218798139 [Google Scholar]
6. Jiang, W. Y.
   (2020) Benchmarking Students’ Attainment in Australian Tertiary Chinese Programs Using the New HSK Tests. Creative Education, 111, 624–638. 10.4236/ce.2020.115047
   https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.115047 [Google Scholar]
7. Liao, T., Lan, P., Liang, C., & Chen, P.
   (2022) CEFR yu ACTFL dagang kouyu zhibiao duiying yanjiu CEFR與 ACTFL大綱口語指標對應研究：以「華語文口語測驗 」為媒介 [Aligning the CEFR Oral Descriptors with the ACTFL Speaking Proficiency Guidelines Based on the TOCFL Speaking Test]. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching華語文教學研究, 19.21: 1–32.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Martyniuk, W.
   (Ed.) (2010) Aligning tests with the CEFR: Reflections on using the Council of Europe’s draft manual. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Miaochun Wei
   (2017) Chinese Placement Procedures at U.S. Postsecondary Institutions, Doctorate dissertation, The George Washington University, https://scholarspace.library.gwu.edu/etd/t722h8885
10. National Academy for Educational Research
    National Academy for Educational Research (2023) Huayuwen nengli jizhun yingyong cankao zhiyin華語文能力基準應用參考指引 [Reference Guidelines for TBCL Application]. https://coct.naer.edu.tw/download/tech_report華語文能力基準應用參考指引.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
11. Surface, E. A., & Dierdorff, E. C.
    (2003) Reliability and the ACTFL oral proficiency interview: Reporting indices of interrater consistency and agreement for 19 languages. Foreign Language Annals, 36(4), 507–519. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2003.tb02140.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02140.x [Google Scholar]
12. Tedick, D. J.
    (Ed.) (2002) Proficiency-oriented language instruction and assessment: A curriculum handbook for teachers. CARLA Working Paper Series. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, The Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisitionhttps://archive.carla.umn.edu/articulation/polia/polia_intro.pdf
13. Tschirner, E., Bärenfänger, O., & Wanner, I.
    (2012) Assessing evidence of validity of assigning CEFR ratings to the ACTFL oral proficiency interview (OPI) and the oral proficiency interview by computer (OPIc). https://www.languagetesting.com/pub/media/wysiwyg/research/OPIc-CEFR-Study-Final-Report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
14. Villar, S. M. and Meuser-Blincow, F.
    (1993) Proficiency requirement-based and nonproficiency requirement-based second language programs: How do students rate?. Foreign Language Annals, 261: 49–62. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1993.tb01150.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1993.tb01150.x [Google Scholar]
15. Vyn, R., Wesely, P. M., & Neubauer, D.
    (2019) Exploring the effects of foreign language instructional practices on student proficiency development. Foreign Language Annals, 52(1), 45–65. 10.1111/flan.12382
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12382 [Google Scholar]
16. Winke, P., & Ma, W. M.
    (2019) The assessment of Chinese L2 proficiency. InThe Routledge handbook of Chinese language teaching (pp.405–422). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315104652‑26
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315104652-26 [Google Scholar]
17. Winke, P., Zhang, X., Rubio, F., Gass, S., Soneson, D., & Hacking, J.
    (2020) The proficiency profile of language students: Implications for programs. Second Language Research & Practice, 1(1), 25–64. hdl.handle.net/10125/69840
    [Google Scholar]