1887
Volume 59, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2451-828x
  • E-ISSN: 2451-8298
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Interactive listening (IL) is understood as the interactional process in which listeners not just listen and comprehend but also actively monitor the ongoing talk, display understanding of it, clarify meaning, and advance conversation. Despite its importance in L2 learning, IL does not have much presence in standardized proficiency tests. This study thus aims to develop a rating scale for assessing IL with data drawn from beginning-level L2 Chinese learners’ unscripted conversations with L1 interlocutor. Using the framework of conversation analysis, this study identifies three aspects of IL in which different groups of learners vary most distinctively, that is, 1) the variety of listener responses used; 2) the ways in which understanding and engagement are demonstrated; and 3) sequential orientation. A rating scale with specific descriptors is then proposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/csl.00051.wan
2025-02-25
2026-03-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barth-Weingarten, D., & Freitag-Hild, B.
    (2023) Assessing interactional competence in secondary schools: Action accomplishment in English as a foreign language. Applied Pragmatics, 5(2), 240–272. 10.1075/ap.00016.bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00016.bar [Google Scholar]
  2. Burch, A. R. & K. Kley
    (2020) Assessing interactional competence: The role of intersubjectivity in a paired-speaking assessment task. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9(1), 25–63. 10.58379/VKYG7791
    https://doi.org/10.58379/VKYG7791 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dai, D. W.
    (2022) Design and validation of an L2-Chinese interactional competence test. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne. https://search.proquest.com/openview/fda5​f389​be02​74fe​555b​4ff6​2752​31dc/1?​pq​-orig​site=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  4. Dings, A.
    (2014) Interactional competence and the development of alignment activity. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 742–756.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ducasse, A. M. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ducasse, A. M., & Brown, A.
    (2009) Assessing paired orals: Raters’ orientation to interaction. Language Testing, 26(3), 423–443. 10.1177/0265532209104669
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104669 [Google Scholar]
  7. Field, J.
    (2019) Rethinking the Second Language Listening Test. Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fulcher, G., Davidson, F., & Kemp, J.
    (2011) Effective rating scale development for speaking tests: Performance decision trees. Language Testing, 28(1), 5–29. 10.1177/0265532209359514
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209359514 [Google Scholar]
  9. Galaczi, E. D.
    (2014) Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests?Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 553–574. 10.1093/applin/amt017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017 [Google Scholar]
  10. Galaczi, E., & Taylor, L.
    (2018) Interactional Competence: Conceptualisations, Operationalisations, and Outstanding Questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 219–236. 10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J.
    (1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19(1), 283–307. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall, J. K. & Doehler, S. P.
    (2011) L2 interactional competence and development. InJ. K. Hall, J. Hellermann & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 Interactional Competence and Development (pp.1–18). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847694072‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694072-003 [Google Scholar]
  13. Heritage, J.
    (2007) Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. InN. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives, (pp.255–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486746.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486746.012 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoshi, S.
    (2022) Effects of classroom instruction on the development of L2 interactional resource for joint stance taking: Use of Japanese interactional particle yo in spontaneous peer conversation. Applied Linguistics, 43(4), 698–724. 10.1093/applin/amab074
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab074 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ikeda, N.
    (2017) Measuring L2 oral pragmatic abilities for use in social contexts: Development and validation of an assessment instrument for L2 pragmatic performance in university settings. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne.
  16. Ishida, M.
    (2009) Development of interactional competence: changes in the use of ne in L2 Japanese during study abroad. InH. Nguyen, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp.351–385). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’I, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, (pp.13–34). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mEI3qWPvJKoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA13&dq=gail+jefferson+transcription&ots=TWJG52DAoS&sig=bJuMezIINSa_RrFZkvDp42SXi5A. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  18. Kley, K.
    (2019) What counts as evidence for interactional competence? Developing rating criteria for a German classroom-based paired speaking test. InR. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: Bridging theory and Practice (pp.291–321). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑12
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-12 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kley, K., Kunitz, S. & Yeh, M.
    (2021) Jiazhou? Is It California? Operationalizing repair in classroom-based assessment. InM. R. Salaberry and A. R. Burch (Eds.), Assessing Speaking in Context: Expanding the Construct and Its Applications (pp.165–191). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788923828‑008
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788923828-008 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lam, D. M. K.
    (2018) What counts as “responding”? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of interactional competence. Language Testing, 35(3), 377–401. 10.1177/0265532218758126
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758126 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lam, D. M.
    (2021) Don’t turn a deaf ear: A case for assessing interactive listening. Applied Linguistics, 42(4), 740–764. 10.1093/applin/amaa064
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa064 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lam, D. M. K., Galaczi, E., Nakatsuhara, F., & May, L.
    (2023) Assessing interactional competence: Exploring ratability challenges. Applied Pragmatics, 5(2), 208–233. 10.1075/ap.00014.lam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00014.lam [Google Scholar]
  23. Lerner, G. H.
    (2004) Collaborative turn sequences. InG. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp.225–56.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.12ler
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.12ler [Google Scholar]
  24. Masuda, K.
    (2011) Acquiring interactional competence in a study abroad context: Japanese language learners’ use of the interactional particle ne. The Modern Language Journal, 95(4), 519–540. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01256.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01256.x [Google Scholar]
  25. May, L.
    (2011) Interactional Competence in a Paired Speaking Test: Features Salient to Raters. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(2), 127–145. 10.1080/15434303.2011.565845
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.565845 [Google Scholar]
  26. May, L., Nakatsuhara, F., Lam, D., & Galaczi, E.
    (2020) Developing tools for learning oriented assessment of interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice. Language Testing, 37(2), 165–188. 10.1177/0265532219879044
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219879044 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ohta, A. S.
    (2001a) Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410604712
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604712 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2001b) A longitudinal study of the development of expression of alignment in Japanese as a foreign language. InK. R. Rose, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp.103–120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524797.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797.010 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E.
    (2018) L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 555–578.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Plough, I., Banerjee, J., & Iwashita, N.
    (2018) Interactional competence: Genie out of the bottle. Language Testing, 35(3), 427–445. 10.1177/0265532218772325
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218772325 [Google Scholar]
  31. Roebuck, R. F., & Wagner, L. C.
    (2004) Teaching repetition as a communicative and cognitive tool: Evidence from a Spanish conversation class. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 70–89. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2004.00054.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00054.x [Google Scholar]
  32. Roever, C. & Dai, D. W.
    (2021) Reconceptualising interactional competence for language testing. InM. R. Salaberry & A. R. Burch (Eds.), Assessing speaking in context: Expanding the construct and its applications (pp.23–49). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Roever, C., & Kasper, G.
    (2018) Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, 35(3), 331–355. 10.1177/0265532218758128
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758128 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ross, S.
    (2018) Listener response as a facet of interactional competence. Language Testing, 35(3), 357–375. 10.1177/0265532218758125
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758125 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  36. Sandlund, E. & Sundqvist, P.
    (2019) Doing versus assessing interactional competence. InM. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice (pp.357–396). Abingdon and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑14
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-14 [Google Scholar]
  37. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. InD. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp.71–93). Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol.11). Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5XbJRFQ4dhsC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=conversation+analysis&ots=MjB3FQSR1t&sig=d-B3rB08WeqkIouma-VYCGFfXDQ
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Shively, R. L.
    (2015) Developing interactional competence during study abroad: Listener responses in L2 Spanish. System, 481, 86–98. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sidnell, J.
    (2011) Conversation analysis: An introduction (Vol.451). John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Tecedor, M.
    (2016) Beginning learners’ development of interactional competence: Alignment activity. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 23–41. 10.1111/flan.12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12177 [Google Scholar]
  42. Utashiro, T., & Kawai, G.
    (2009) Blended learning for Japanese reactive tokens: Effects of computer-led, instructor-led, and peer-based instruction. InN. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence (pp.275–300). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110218558.275
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218558.275 [Google Scholar]
  43. Vandergrift, L.
    (1997) The Cinderella of Communication Strategies: Reception Strategies in Interactive Listening. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 494–505. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05517.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05517.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Walters, F. S.
    (2007) A conversation-analytic hermeneutic rating protocol to assess L2 oral pragmatic competence. Language Testing, 24(2), 155–183. 10.1177/0265532207076362
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207076362 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, W., & Yeh, M.
    (2024) The effect of instruction on the development of L2 interactional competence: Listener responses in Chinese as a second language. System, 1271, 103511. 10.1016/j.system.2024.103511
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103511 [Google Scholar]
  46. Youn, S. J.
    (2015) Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32(2), 199–225. 10.1177/0265532214557113
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214557113 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/csl.00051.wan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/csl.00051.wan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error