What’s next after a correct answer

References

1. Anderson, D. C.
   (1979) The formal basis for a contextually sensitive classroom agenda. Instructional Science, 8(1), 43–65. 10.1007/BF00054981
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054981 [Google Scholar]
2. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
   (2022) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program].
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bolden, G. B.
   (2006) Little words that matter: Discourse markers “so” and “oh” and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 661–688. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00314.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00314.x [Google Scholar]
4. Cekaite, A.
   (2007) Soliciting teacher attention in an L2 classroom: Affect displays, classroom artefacts, and embodied action. Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 26–48. 10.1093/applin/amm057
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm057 [Google Scholar]
5. Cho, E., Park, H. J. L., & Looney, S. D.
   (2024) Multimodality in third turn repetitions: Evaluation, mitigation, and the pursuit of responses in a Korean-as-foreign-language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). 10.1177/13621688241241037
   https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241241037 [Google Scholar]
6. Çopur, N., Atar, C., & Walsh, S.
   (2021) Humour as a pedagogical tool in teacher-initiated repair sequences: The case of extreme case formulations and candidate hearing. Classroom Discourse, 12(3), 280–294. 10.1080/19463014.2021.1910051
   https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1910051 [Google Scholar]
7. Couper-Kuhlen, E.
   (2009) A sequential approach to affect: The case of “disappointment.” InM. Haakana, M. Laakso, & J. Lindström (Eds.), Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensions (pp.94–123). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura (Finnish Literature Society).
   [Google Scholar]
8. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
   (2018) Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ccsvpELAN
   ccsvpELAN (2024) (Version 6.8) Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ellis, R.
    (2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Endo, T.
    (2010) Expressing stance in Mandarin conversation: Epistemic and non-epistemic uses of wo juede (Publication No. 3441464) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
12. Feng, S.
    (2018) Prosodic morphology in Mandarin Chinese (1st ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H.
    (2004) School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. 10.3102/00346543074001059
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 [Google Scholar]
14. Freese, J., & Maynard, D. W.
    (1998) Prosodic features of bad news and good news in conversation. Language in Society, 27(2), 195–219. 10.1017/S0047404500019850
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019850 [Google Scholar]
15. Gardner, R.
    (2019) Classroom interaction research: The state of the art. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 212–226. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1631037
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631037 [Google Scholar]
16. Goffman, E.
    (1981) Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goodwin, C.
    (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, 371, 97–121.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Goodwin, C.
    (2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
19. Goodwin, C.
    (2013) The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
20. Haydon, T., Conroy, M. A., Scott, T. M., Sindelar, P. T., Barber, B. R., & Orlando, A. M.
    (2010) A comparison of three types of opportunities to respond on student academic and social behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18(1), 27–40. 10.1177/1063426609333448
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426609333448 [Google Scholar]
21. Hellermann, J.
    (2008) Social Actions for Classroom Language Learning. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hellermann, J., & Cole, E.
    (2009) Practices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom: Disengagements from dyadic task interaction. Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 186–215. 10.1093/applin/amn032
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn032 [Google Scholar]
23. Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B.
    (2012) The conversation analytic approach to transcription. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.57–76). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch4 [Google Scholar]
24. Heritage, J.
    (2012) The Epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
25. Kääntä, L.
    (2012) Teachers’ embodied allocations in instructional interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(2), 166–186. 10.1080/19463014.2012.716624
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2012.716624 [Google Scholar]
26. Kendon, A.
    (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
27. Kikuchi, K.
    (2009) Listening to our learners’ voices: What demotivates Japanese high school students?Language Teaching Research, 131, 453–471. 10.1177/1362168809341520
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809341520 [Google Scholar]
28. Koshik, I.
    (2002) Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277–309. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2 [Google Scholar]
29. Lambert, Craig, Philp, Jenefer & Nakamura, Sachiko
    (2017) Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research. 211. 665–680. 10.1177/1362168816683559
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683559 [Google Scholar]
30. Lauzon, V. F., & Berger, E.
    (2015) The multimodal organization of speaker selection in classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 311, 14–29. 10.1016/j.linged.2015.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.05.001 [Google Scholar]
31. Lee, Y. A.
    (2007) Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(6), 1204–1230. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.003 [Google Scholar]
32. Lee, J. W., Tao, H., & Lu, P.
    (2017) Transcribing Mandarin Chinese conversation: Linguistic and prosodic issues. Asia-Pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 7(5), 787–799. 10.14257/AJMAHS.2017.05.70
    https://doi.org/10.14257/AJMAHS.2017.05.70 [Google Scholar]
33. Li, X.
    (2019) Researching multimodality in Chinese interaction: A methodological account. InX. Li & T. Ono (Eds.), Multimodality in Chinese interaction (pp.24–62). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110462395‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110462395-003 [Google Scholar]
34. Lim, N. E.
    (2011) From subjectivity to intersubjectivity: Epistemic marker wo juede in Chinese. InX. Yun, T. Liang, & H. L. Soh (Eds.), Current issues in Chinese linguistics (pp.265–300). Cambridge Scholars Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Local, J.
    (1996) Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation. InE. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp.177–230). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.007 [Google Scholar]
36. Local, J., & Walker, G.
    (2008) Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources. Text & Talk, 28(6), 723–747. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.037 [Google Scholar]
37. Margutti, P.
    (2006) “Are you human beings?” Order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 17(4), 313–346. 10.1016/j.linged.2006.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.12.002 [Google Scholar]
38. Margutti, P., & Drew, P.
    (2014) Positive evaluation of student answers in classroom instruction. Language and Education, 28(5), 436–458. 10.1080/09500782.2014.898650
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.898650 [Google Scholar]
39. Markee, N.
    (2005) The Organization of Off-task Talk in Second Language Classrooms. In: Richards, K., Seedhouse, P. (eds) Applying Conversation Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. 10.1057/9780230287853_12
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287853_12 [Google Scholar]
40. Markee, N.
    (Ed.) (2015) The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction. Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118531242
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118531242 [Google Scholar]
41. Markee, N., & Kasper, G.
    (2004) Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 491–500. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑14‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x [Google Scholar]
42. Matsumoto, Y., Lee, J. J., & Kim, E.
    (2022) “Laughing moments”: The complex negotiation of laughing acts among students and teachers in an English as a second language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 13(1), 32–63. 10.1080/19463014.2020.1808494
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2020.1808494 [Google Scholar]
43. McGaugh, J. L.
    (2013) Making lasting memories: Remembering the significant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(supplement_2), 10402–10407. 10.1073/pnas.1301209110
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301209110 [Google Scholar]
44. McHoul, A. W., & Watson, D. R.
    (1984) Two axes for the analysis of ‘commonsense’ and ‘formal’ geographical knowledge in classroom talk. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 5(3), 281–302. 10.1080/0142569840050305
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569840050305 [Google Scholar]
45. McNeill, D.
    (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Mehan, H.
    (1979) ‘What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory Into Practice, 18(4), 285–294. 10.1080/00405847909542846
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846 [Google Scholar]
47. Mondada, L.
    (2016) Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. 10.1111/josl.1_12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177 [Google Scholar]
48. Morek, M., Heller, V., & Kinalzik, N.
    (2023) Engaging ‘silent’ students in classroom discussions: A micro-analytic view on teachers’ embodied enactments of cold-calling practices. Language and Education, 37(6), 731–749. 10.1080/09500782.2022.2155474
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2155474 [Google Scholar]
49. Mortensen, K.
    (2009) Establishing recipiency in pre-beginning position in the second language classroom. Discourse Processes, 46(5), 491–515. 10.1080/01638530902959463
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959463 [Google Scholar]
50. Netz, H.
    (2016) Designedly incomplete utterances and student participation. Linguistics and Education, 331, 56–73. 10.1016/j.linged.2016.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.01.001 [Google Scholar]
51. Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., & Fryer, L. K.
    (2018) Schools can improve motivational quality: Profile transitions across early foreign language learning experiences. Motivation and Emotion, 42(4), 527–545. 10.1007/s11031‑018‑9681‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9681-7 [Google Scholar]
52. Park, I.
    (2021) Moving out of the here and now: An examination of frame shifts during microteaching. Linguistics and Education, 661, 100979. 10.1016/j.linged.2021.100979
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100979 [Google Scholar]
53. Parkinson, J., & Whitty, L.
    (2022) The role of tag questions in classroom discourse in promoting student engagement. Classroom Discourse, 13(1), 83–105. 10.1080/19463014.2021.1954959
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1954959 [Google Scholar]
54. Payne, G., & Hustler, D.
    (1980) Teaching the class: The practical management of a cohort. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1(1), 49–66. 10.1080/0142569800010104
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569800010104 [Google Scholar]
55. Philp, J., & Duchesne, S.
    (2016) Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 50–72. 10.1017/S0267190515000094
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094 [Google Scholar]
56. Pi, Z., Zhu, F., Zhang, Y., & Yang, J.
    (2024) An instructor’s beat gestures facilitate second language vocabulary learning from instructional videos: Behavioral and neural evidence. Language Teaching Research, 28(5), 1997–2025. 10.1177/13621688211039023
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211039023 [Google Scholar]
57. Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P.
    (2012) Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. InS. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.365–386). Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑2018‑7_17
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17 [Google Scholar]
58. Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J.
    (2012) Preference. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.210–228). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch11
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch11 [Google Scholar]
59. Raymond, G.
    (2000) The structure of responding: Type-conforming and nonconforming responses to yes/no-type interrogatives. (Publication No. 9981719) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
60. Reber, E.
    (2012) Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.215
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.215 [Google Scholar]
61. Reeve, J.
    (2012) A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. InS. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.149–172). Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑2018‑7_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7 [Google Scholar]
62. Rossano, F., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
    (2009) Gaze, questioning and culture. InJ. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp.187–249). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511635670.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670.008 [Google Scholar]
63. Rossano, F.
    (2012) Gaze in conversation. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.308–329). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch15
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch15 [Google Scholar]
64. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) The simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
65. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
66. Schwab, G.
    (2011) From dialogue to multilogue: A different view on participation in the English foreign-language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 2(1), 3–19. 10.1080/19463014.2011.562654
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2011.562654 [Google Scholar]
67. Seedhouse, P.
    (1996) Classroom interaction: Possibilities and impossibilities. ELT Journal, 50(1), 16–24. 10.1093/elt/50.1.16
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.1.16 [Google Scholar]
68. Seedhouse, P.
    (2004) The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J. R., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Ouasthoff, U., Schutte, W., Stukenbrock, A., & Uhmann, S.
    (2009) Gesprächsanalytisches transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion, 101, 353–402
    [Google Scholar]
70. Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D.
    (2015) The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. 10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924 [Google Scholar]
71. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M.
    (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J.
    (2009) A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. 10.1177/0013164408323233
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233 [Google Scholar]
73. Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R.
    (2012) Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. InS. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.21–44). Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑2018‑7_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2 [Google Scholar]
74. Stivers, T.
    (2012) Sequence organization. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Ed.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.191–209). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch10 [Google Scholar]
75. Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J.
    (2012) Introduction. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.1–8). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch1
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch1 [Google Scholar]
76. Storch, N.
    (2008) Metatalk in a Pair Work Activity: Level of Engagement and Implications for Language Development. Language Awareness, 17(2), 95–114. 10.1080/09658410802146644
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802146644 [Google Scholar]
77. Sulis, G.
    (2022) Engagement in the foreign language classroom: Micro and macro perspectives. System, 1101, 102902. 10.1016/j.system.2022.102902
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102902 [Google Scholar]
78. Walker, G.
    (2010) The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice. InM. Selting, D. Barth-Weingarten, & E. Reber (Eds.), Prosody in interaction (pp.51–72). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.23.08wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.08wal [Google Scholar]
79. Walker, K. A., & Koralesky, K. E.
    (2021) Student and instructor perceptions of engagement after the rapid online transition of teaching due to COVID-19. Natural Sciences Education, 50(1), e20038. 10.1002/nse2.20038
    https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20038 [Google Scholar]
80. Walsh, S.
    (2002) Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3–23. 10.1191/1362168802lr095oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168802lr095oa [Google Scholar]
81. Walsh, S.
    (2011) Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203827826
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826 [Google Scholar]
82. Walsh, S.
    (2013) Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748645190
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748645190 [Google Scholar]
83. Wang, X.
    (2020) Managing a suspended course of action: A multimodal study of suoyi ‘so’-prefaced utterances in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse, 11(2), 306–334. 10.1075/cld.20011.wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.20011.wan [Google Scholar]
84. Wang, X., & Li, X.
    (2024) Teachers’ eyebrow and head movements and repeats as other-initiations of repair in second-language classrooms. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 6(3). 10.7146/si.v6i3.142895
    https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v6i3.142895 [Google Scholar]
85. Wang, X., Li, X., & Li, S.
    (2024) Pursuing student response through incomplete syntax, prosody, bodily- and visuo-orthographical resources in Chinese-as-a-second-language classrooms. Classroom Discourse, 0(0), 1–27. 10.1080/19463014.2024.2335945
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2335945 [Google Scholar]
86. Waring, H.
    (2008) Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 577. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00788.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00788.x [Google Scholar]
87. Waring, H. Z.
    (2009) Moving out of IRF (initiation-response-feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00526.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00526.x [Google Scholar]
88. Waring, H. Z.
    (2013) Managing Stacy: A case study of turn-taking in the language classroom. System, 41(3), 841–851. 10.1016/j.system.2013.08.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.007 [Google Scholar]
89. Waring, H. Z., & Carpenter, L. B.
    (2019) Gaze shifts as a resource for managing attention and recipiency. InJ. K. Hall, & S. Looney (Eds.), The embodied work of teaching (pp.122–141). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788925501‑010
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788925501-010 [Google Scholar]
90. Wong, J., & Waring, H.
    (2009) “Very good” as a teacher response. ELT Journal, 63(3), 195–203. 10.1093/elt/ccn042
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn042 [Google Scholar]
91. Yao, S.
    (2009) “口语中“所以”的语义弱化与功能拓展 [Semantic reduction and function expansion of “suoyi（所以）”in spoken Chinese]. 汉语学报 [Chinese Linguistics], (3), 16–23.
    [Google Scholar]