1887
image of Multimodal resources for managing student participation after unsuccessful designedly incomplete utterances
in CSL classrooms

Abstract

Abstract

L2 teachers employ various multimodal resources, including designedly incomplete utterances (DIUs), to elicit student response in classroom interaction. Building on the work of Wang et al. (2024), this study further investigates how Chinese-as-a-second-language (CSL) teachers use multimodal resources to elicit student responses when DIUs fail to prompt a response. A two-step pattern has been observed in the data. First, the teachers routinely employ scanning gaze and body holds to enhance student participation while they wait for a student response. After that, interrogatives, repetition, and pedagogical artifacts (such as PowerPoint slides) are used as hints to increase the transparency of answers. By providing a micro-level analysis of real classroom interaction and case distribution numbers, this paper demonstrates how teachers orient to and address the issue of a lack of response. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of classroom interactional competence and provides insights for enhancing language teaching practices.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/csl.00059.wan
2025-04-01
2025-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/csl.00059.wan/csl.00059.wan.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/csl.00059.wan&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aldrup, M.
    (2019) ‘Well let me put it uhm the other way around maybe’: Managing students’ trouble displays in the CLIL classroom. Classroom Discourse, (), –. 10.1080/19463014.2019.1567360
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1567360 [Google Scholar]
  2. Balaman, U.
    (2019) Sequential organization of hinting in online task-oriented L2 interaction. Text & Talk, (), –. 10.1515/text‑2019‑2038
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2038 [Google Scholar]
  3. Can Daşkın, N. & Hatipoğlu, C.
    (2019) Reference to a past learning event in teacher turns in an L2 instructional setting. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.023 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chazal, K.
    (2015) Pedagogical artifacts in teacher-initiated response pursuits: A conversation analytic study of interaction in the French foreign language classroom. [Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, USA].
  5. (2020) Multimodal mechanisms for mobilizing students to give pre-structured responses in French L2 classroom interaction. InC. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, P. Golato (Eds.), Mobilizing others: Grammar and lexis within larger activities (pp.–). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/slsi.33.07cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33.07cha [Google Scholar]
  6. De Vos, C., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S. C.
    (2015) Turn-timing in signed conversations: Coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology, , Article 268. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268 [Google Scholar]
  7. Duran, D., & Jacknick, C. M.
    (2020) Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions. Linguistics and Education, , . 10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808 [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards, D. & Mercer, N.
    (1987) Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Etehadieh, E., & Rendle-Short, J.
    (2016) Intersubjectivity or preference: interpreting student pauses in supervisory meetings. Australian Journal of Linguistics, (), –. 10.1080/07268602.2015.1121529
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.1121529 [Google Scholar]
  10. Floyd, S., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Torreira, F.
    (2016) The timing of visual bodily behavior in repair sequences: evidence from three languages. Discourse Process, , –. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.992680
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.992680 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A.
    (2010) Responses to wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351811003751680
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351811003751680 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gardner, R.
    (2019) Classroom interaction research: The state of the art. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1631037
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631037 [Google Scholar]
  13. Girard-Groeber, S.
    (2015) The management of turn transition in signed interaction through the lens of overlaps. Frontiers in Psychology, , Article 741. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00741
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00741 [Google Scholar]
  14. Goodwin, C.
    (2018) Co-operative action. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Groeber, S., & Pochon-Berger, E.
    (2014) Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.012 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hosoda, Y.
    (2014) Missing response after teacher question in primary school English as a foreign language classes. Linguistics and Education, , –. 10.1016/j.linged.2014.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jacknick, C. M.
    (2021) Multimodal participation and engagement: Social interaction in the classroom. Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Käänta, L.
    (2010) Teacher turn-allocation and repair practices in classroom interaction: A multisemiotic perspective. [Ph.D. dissertation, University of Jyväskylä], Jyväskylä.
  19. Koshik, I.
    (2002) Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lam Hoang, T. G., & Filipi, A.
    (2019) In pursuit of understanding and response: A micro-analysis of language alternation practices in an EFL university context in Vietnam. The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2016.1221439
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1221439 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee, J.
    (2016) Teacher entries into second turn positions: IRFs in collaborative teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lerner, G. H.
    (1995) Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01638539109544907
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544907 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2003) Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, (), –. 10.1017/S004740450332202X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, X.
    (2014) Multimodality, interaction and turn-taking in Mandarin conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scld.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.3 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2019) Researching multimodality in Chinese interaction: A methodological account. InX. Li and T. Ono (Eds.), Multimodality in Chinese interaction (pp.–). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110462395‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110462395-003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin, F.
    (2014) A conversation-analytic study of word searches in EFL classrooms. [Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Newcastle University].
  27. Lü, S.
    (1980) 《现代汉语八百词》[Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci: 800 Words in Modern Chinese]. 商务印书馆 [Shangwu yinshuguan: Commercial press].
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Manrique, E.
    (2016) Other-initiated repair in Argentine Sign Language. Open Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/opli‑2016‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Margutti, P.
    (2006) “Are you human beings?” order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, (), –. 10.1016/j.linged.2006.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2010) On designedly incomplete utterances: What counts as learning for teachers and students in primary classroom interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2010.497629
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2010.497629 [Google Scholar]
  31. Matsumoto, Y.
    (2019) Material moments: Teacher and student use of materials in multilingual writing classroom interactions. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12547
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12547 [Google Scholar]
  32. McHoul, A. W.
    (1978) The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, (), –. 10.1017/S0047404500005522
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005522 [Google Scholar]
  33. (1990) The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, (), –. 10.1017/S004740450001455X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001455X [Google Scholar]
  34. Mehan, H.
    (1979a) Learning lessons: The social organization of classroom behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674420106
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 [Google Scholar]
  35. (1979b) ‘What time is it, Denise?’: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, (), –. 10.1080/00405847909542846
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mondada, L.
    (2007) Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1461445607075346
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2016) Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mortensen, K.
    (2008) Selecting next speaker in the second language classroom: How to find a willing next speaker in planned activities. Applied Linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2009) Establishing recipiency in pre-beginning position in the second language classroom, Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01638530902959463
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959463 [Google Scholar]
  40. Netz, H.
    (2016) Designedly incomplete utterances and student participation. Linguistics and Education, , –. 10.1016/j.linged.2016.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2021) L2 interactional competence and L2 education. InS. Kunitz, N. Markee, & O. Sert (Eds.), Classroom-based conversation analytic research: Theoretical and applied perspectives on pedagogy (pp.–). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑52193‑6_21
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52193-6_21 [Google Scholar]
  42. Rossano, F.
    (2012) Gaze in conversation. InJ. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.–), Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch15
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch15 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sacks, H. & Schegloff, E. A.
    (2002) Home position. Gesture, (), –. 10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac [Google Scholar]
  44. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1968) Sequencing in conversational practice. American Anthropologist, , –. 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2000) When others initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/21.2.205
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.2.205 [Google Scholar]
  46. Seedhouse, P.
    (2004) The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J. R., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Ouasthoff, U., Schutte, W., Stukenbrock, A., & Uhmann, S.
    (2009) Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung — Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sert, O.
    (2019) The interplay between collaborative turn sequences and active listenership: Implications for the development of L2 interactional competence. InR. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice (pp.–). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-6 [Google Scholar]
  49. Sert, O. & Walsh, S.
    (2013) The interactional management of claims of insufficient knowledge in English language classrooms. Language and Education, (), –. 10.1080/09500782.2012.739174
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.739174 [Google Scholar]
  50. Sidnell, J.
    (2005) Gesture in the pursuit and display of recognition: A Caribbean case study. Semiotica, , –. 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.55
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.55 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stivers, T., & Rossano, F.
    (2010) Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351810903471258
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tao, H.
    (1996) Units in Mandarin conversation: Prosody, discourse, and grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.5 [Google Scholar]
  53. ten Have, P.
    (2007) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781849208895
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895 [Google Scholar]
  54. Walsh, S.
    (2002) Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1191/1362168802lr095oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168802lr095oa [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang, X., Li, X., & Li, S.
    (2024) Pursuing student response through incomplete syntax, prosody, bodily- and visuo-orthographical resources in Chinese-as-a-second-language classrooms. Classroom Discourse, –. 10.1080/19463014.2024.2335945
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2335945 [Google Scholar]
  56. Waring, H. Z.
    (2015) Promoting self-discovery in the language classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2015‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0003 [Google Scholar]
  57. (2019) The what and how of English language teaching: Conversation analytic perspectives. InX. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp.–). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑02899‑2_54
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_54 [Google Scholar]
  58. Waring, H. Z. & Carpenter, L. B.
    (2019) Gaze shifts as a resource for managing attention and participation. InJ. K. Hall and S. D. Looney (Eds.), The embodied work of teaching (pp.–). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788925501‑010
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788925501-010 [Google Scholar]
  59. Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z.
    (2010) Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy. A guide for ES/EL teachers. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203852347
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852347 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/csl.00059.wan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/csl.00059.wan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error