1887
image of Navigating claims of insufficient knowledge in one-on-one Chinese tutoring
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines the occurrence of claims of insufficient knowledge in one-on-one college-level Chinese tutoring sessions, drawing on 12 hours of videotaped data. Using conversation analysis, it examines the progression of these claims, the multimodal resources employed, and tutors’ responses. Two sequential patterns emerge: (1) claims during vocabulary checks and (2) claims following knowledge-sharing questions. In both patterns, tutees occasionally express direct claims. However, they more often engage in reflective processes, accompanied by embodied displays, before articulating a claim of insufficient knowledge. In the second pattern, they sometimes specify inaccessible aspects, leading to partial claims. Tutors act as facilitators, providing timely support to bridge knowledge gaps and maintain engagement. This study enhances understanding of epistemics, multimodal resources, and participation, shedding light on a specialized yet understudied aspect of teacher-student interaction in Chinese as a Second Language learning.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/csl.00065.tsa
2025-05-02
2025-05-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Belhiah, H.
    (2009) Tutoring as an embodied activity: How speech, gaze and body orientation are coordinated to conduct ESL tutorial business. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.027
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.027 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolden, G. B.
    (2009) Beyond answering: Repeat-preface responses in conversation. Communication Monographs, (), –. 10.1080/03637750902828446
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750902828446 [Google Scholar]
  3. Drew, P.
    (1992) Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. InP. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Duran, D., & Jacknick, C. M.
    (2020) Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions. Linguistics and Education, , –. 10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808 [Google Scholar]
  5. Duran, D., & Jakonen, T.
    (2022) Mobilizing ‘context’: Vocabulary checks in ESL tutoring sessions. System, , Article 102816. 10.1016/j.system.2022.102816
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102816 [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodwin, C.
    (1987) Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, –. 10.2307/2786746
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786746 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2002) Time in action. Current Anthropology, (), –. 10.1086/339566
    https://doi.org/10.1086/339566 [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J.
    (1990) Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, , –. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435 [Google Scholar]
  9. He, A. W.
    (2004) CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑19‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-19-.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Heritage, J.
    (2012) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang, S.
    (2013) Chinese grammar at work. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scld.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.1 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hutchby, I.
    (2002) Resisting the incitement to talk in child counselling: aspects of the utterance ‘I don’t know’. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/14614456020040020201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040020201 [Google Scholar]
  13. Jakonen, T., & Morton, T.
    (2015) Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amt031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt031 [Google Scholar]
  14. Jefferson, G.
    (1972) Side Sequences. InD. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp.–). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  16. Keevallik, L.
    (2011) The terms of not knowing. InT. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.009 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, Y.
    (2019) ‘What is Stoyr-steruh type?’: Knowledge asymmetry, intersubjectivity, and learning opportunities in conversation-for-learning. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amx029
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx029 [Google Scholar]
  18. Koshik, I.
    (2002) Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, Y.-A.
    (2007) Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2008) Yes-no questions in the third-turn position: Pedagogical discourse processes. Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01638530701739215
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530701739215 [Google Scholar]
  21. Markee, N., & Kasper, G.
    (2004) Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑14‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Mehan, H.
    (1979) Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674420106
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mortensen, K.
    (2008) Selecing next speaker in the second langauge classroom: How to find a willing next speaker in palnned activities. Journal of Applied Linguistcs, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Okada, Y., & Greer, T.
    (2013) Pursuing a relevant response in oral proficiency interview role plays. InS. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp.–). Springer. 10.1057/9781137003522_11
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003522_11 [Google Scholar]
  25. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1996) Issues of relevance for discourse analysis: Contingency in action, interaction and co-participant context. InE. H. Hovy & D. Scott (Eds.), Computational and conversational discourse: Burning issues— an interdisciplinary account (pp.–). Springer Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑03293‑0_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03293-0_1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Scheibman, J.
    (2000) I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don’t in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00032‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00032-6 [Google Scholar]
  27. Seedhouse, P.
    (2004) The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Seo, M.-S., & Koshik, I.
    (2010) A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sert, O.
    (2013) ‘Epistemic status check’ as an interactional phenomenon in instructed learning settings. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2015) Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748692651
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748692651 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sert, O., & Walsh, S.
    (2013) The interactional management of claims of insufficient knowledge in English language classrooms. Language and Education, (), –. 10.1080/09500782.2012.739174
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.739174 [Google Scholar]
  32. Stivers, T., & Enfield, N. J.
    (2010) A coding scheme for question-response sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  33. Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D.
    (2006) A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, , –. 10.1017/S0047404506060179
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060179 [Google Scholar]
  34. Tao, H.
    (2015) Profiling the Mandarin spoken vocabulary based on corpora. InW. S.-Y. Wang & C. Sun (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics (pp.–). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2016) Disputed memory and the social interactive functions of remembering/forgetting expressions in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Thompson, S. A., Fox, B. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (2015) Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139381154
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381154 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, W.
    (2021) The question-response system in Mandarin conversation. Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/prag.20019.wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20019.wan [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, Y.-F., Tsai, P.-H., Goodman, D., & Lin, M.-Y.
    (2010) Agreement, acknowledgment, and alignment: The discourse-pragmatic functions of hao and dui in Taiwan Mandarin conversation. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1461445609346922
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609346922 [Google Scholar]
  39. Weatherall, A.
    (2011) I don’t know as a prepositioned epistemic hedge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2011.619310
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.619310 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/csl.00065.tsa
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/csl.00065.tsa
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error